Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 12:05 PM
mpotter mpotter is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,145
mpotter is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,983
Default LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikari";p=&quot View Post
I feel about inter-racial marriage the same way I feel about same sex marriage. Nothing wrong with it, and it's none of my business. In fact, I could go one further and say that inter-racial dating/marriage is a very good thing as it gets people to experience different cultures and allows them to grow and become more open. Besides, as a white dude I am of the opinion that Asian women are super hot!
Ikari, you are too funny. Anyhow, I agree, inter-racial relationships allow the culture and society as a whole to become more tolerant of one another. Good point. The melting pot is simmering, and it smells good.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 12:11 PM
EuP's Avatar
EuP EuP is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,247
EuP is on a distinguished road
Credits: 11,529
Default ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpotter
Quote:
Originally Posted by EuP
Been there, done that, didn't care for it.
I can never tell if you are being serious or if you are playing devils advocate.
I am completely serious. I married a woman of another race when I was in the military. It was a poor idea.
__________________
What have you done for your people today?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 12:12 PM
myopicmouse's Avatar
myopicmouse myopicmouse is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,388
myopicmouse is on a distinguished road
Credits: 11,458
Send a message via MSN to myopicmouse
Default bj,

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpotter";p=&quot View Post
It is fading away, but for a while there, it was a huge issue. My correlation to gay marriage I feel is quite logical. At one time inter-racial relationships were thought of as taboo, and in most cases people viewed it as morally wrong, many still do. Similarly to the issue of homosexuality. While neither is for everyone, to each his own, it is wrong to make claim that either is wrong. If you love someone of a different race, you can't hide it. You can't keep it to yourself. Same goes for gays. You can't help who you fall in love with. You can't hide your desires. The two issues are indirectly related. While we are moving more toward accepting inter-racial marriages and/or relationships, we are moving away from accepting gay relationships and marriages.
I agree on the gay marriage as well, I think it's prefectly natural, animals (500+) species have been recorded to have gay couples, so it shows it to be a prefectly normal thing. After all a couple is a couple and if they want the same rights as man/woman marriage then why not. However the only thing i would say is that it should be a civil ceremoney - not in a church. (but thats all they're after anyway- isn't it?)

----
Ikari - kudos on asians being super hot.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 12:41 PM
Ikari's Avatar
Ikari Ikari is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 944
Ikari is on a distinguished road
Credits: 6,909
Default ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpotter";p=&quot View Post
It is fading away, but for a while there, it was a huge issue. My correlation to gay marriage I feel is quite logical. At one time inter-racial relationships were thought of as taboo, and in most cases people viewed it as morally wrong, many still do. Similarly to the issue of homosexuality. While neither is for everyone, to each his own, it is wrong to make claim that either is wrong. If you love someone of a different race, you can't hide it. You can't keep it to yourself. Same goes for gays. You can't help who you fall in love with. You can't hide your desires. The two issues are indirectly related. While we are moving more toward accepting inter-racial marriages and/or relationships, we are moving away from accepting gay relationships and marriages.
It is a very logical jump because the same type of "morality" is used in both instances. There are still places where inter-racial relationships are taboo. Take the white trash portion of my family from Missouri (not saying everyone from Missouri is a white trash, but my mom's side of the family sure as heck is), they are rather racist and firmly believe that races should keep to themselves (I don't think they were pleased when I was dating a girl from India). But if falls under this supposed morality issue where people are so convinced in what they think is right that they don't see the other side. To take it further, they are so convinced that their morality is superior that they wish to prevent other people from pursuing their own happiness in some spiteful attempt to prove themselves correct.

I think I have a unique way of upsetting both Democrats and Republicans on issues (it's the Libertarian in me, I can't help it). But mostly these arguments are devoid of intellect and it bothers me to no end that people will refuse to be rational about things at times (then again, it bothers me that there are people in University that can't do algebra). In matters like this, I really don't see what business of other's it is. If some dude loves a dude, then so be it. It's not my place to say that love is wrong, and it's not my place to forbid them from making a life long (though marriage has become something not so life long these days) commitment to each other. And it's no one else's right to interfere either. It's not like I'm forcing my morality upon another. I do not wish to make any laws that ban a guy and a girl from getting married, nor do I endorse laws that would require a guy marry a guy or a girl marry a girl. Marry whomever you want, go to work, pay taxes, consume, and mow your lawn (for the love of all that is holy mow your lawn!). Beyond that, if you are not hurting others or infringing upon other's rights I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*)ed as to what you do. It's none of my business, and to be honest, I have more things to worry about.

Japanese women are amongst the hottest women on this planet. If anyone knows a cute Japanese girl that wants an American boyfriend, send them to Colorado.....please.
__________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 12:43 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 15,774
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 93,161
Default ...

Quote:
So you view inter-racial marriage as a bad thing...
Um...no. I would vote in favor of it. I am against judicial activism...not against gay marriage. Or inter-racial marriage.

Quote:
You view inter-racial marriage as in some way harming our society?
Heh heh heh...um, not quite (right EuP?)

Quote:
Since marriage in general is not in the constitution, there should be no law banning gay marriage either.
Um...no. Everything is legal unless specifically amde illegal. There is no Constitutional right to marriage, even for heterosexuals. Until there is, it can be denied to anyone if laws are passed doing so.

Quote:
This goes much deeper than merely the state level. There are gays in every state, not just California, as hard as that may be for you to imagine.
Being gay myself, yes, I am aware there are gays in every state, heh heh. I'm not sure what that has to do with anything...the fact that they exist in every state does not automatically make it a federal issue.

Quote:
Intolerant social conservatives (i.e. troglodytes), on the other hand, believed that such marriages were a sin against God and an attack on the traditional family. (Note: now, why does that seem familiar? )
The only way to effect permanent change is to alter their views by reason. We already know this is possible...it's already happened before. Judicial activism is temporary at best, and counter-productive at worst.

Quote:
Civil unions were going to be offered as a compromise in Massachusetts, but GLAD (and many individuals) protested stating they wanted marriage, not civil unions.
Personally, I would have no problem with civil unions. I am an atheist, so I could care less what the church thinks either way. I just want the legal rights. If it makes them feel better to call it "gross homosexual parody of marriage" instead of "marriage"...go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 01:34 PM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,424
Default It never even got that far

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Civil unions were going to be offered as a compromise in Massachusetts, but GLAD (and many individuals) protested stating they wanted marriage, not civil unions.
The reason was that the rights included within civil unions were not the same as those included within marriage.
They didn't talk about what rights were and weren't included. Their argument was that it creates a second class of citizen by calling one arrangement civil unions and the other marriage.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 01:37 PM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,424
Default huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by myopicmouse";p=&quot View Post
Well I would think this would be a fairly straight forward question for americans - since america is made up of so many cultures, I'd doubt if anyone would bat an eyelid at it. I live in Ireland, and it's nearly unheard off to see a different race nevermind knowing of inter-racial marriage (my eyes are opened at the moment as im at university in london and theres more races there thans imaginable) I'd don't see anything wrong with unions of this type. After all, we are all humans, theres no difference because of skin colour, and infact you find those those of another race, seem to be more attractive than your own.
Unheard of? There are now many people in Ireland from Spain and I believe Sierra Leone (one of the western African countries anyway). There are several towns near Shannon where you can't walk without seeing them. Galway has plenty of both as well. In fact, I understand it's a big controversy because they are given free health and it's creating budgetary problems there.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 02:15 PM
G-1 G-1 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: chicago 'burbs
Posts: 792
G-1 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 4,244
Default .

Inter-racial? No problem.

Same sex? No problem.

But inter-racial same sex? THAT"S AN ABOMINATION AGAINST NATURE!!!





Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:14 PM
myopicmouse's Avatar
myopicmouse myopicmouse is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,388
myopicmouse is on a distinguished road
Credits: 11,458
Send a message via MSN to myopicmouse
Default uyk

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Unheard of? There are now many people in Ireland from Spain and I believe Sierra Leone (one of the western African countries anyway). There are several towns near Shannon where you can't walk without seeing them. Galway has plenty of both as well. In fact, I understand it's a big controversy because they are given free health and it's creating budgetary problems there.
I'm in Northern Ireland/Belfast. It's surprising how few people wanted to emmigrate to a country where they might get blown up. As a second point to that, if we kill each other over religion/politics - you can be pretty sure there may be a few 'disagreements' over race as there currently has been with the bombings now pretty much stopped.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:24 PM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,287
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 139,438
Default .

In 2000, Alabama voters repealed a ban on interracial marriage. It had been in the state constitution for over a century. The fact is that hardly anyone even knew that the ban was still there, because interracial marriage was not that unusual. Interracial couples had been married in Alabama for years while the ban was supposedly in effect. My point is that the law came after acceptance. I believe that this would support Sadistic's argument against judicial activism.

That said, I would also point out that Sadistic-Saviour has a better understanding of other people's viewpoints than most people. Even though he is atheist, he seems willing to respect the fact that some people's religion prevents them from approving of gay marriage.

I believe that gay marriage is a religious issue. In other words, without religion, there is no argument against it.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden