Before George Bush's first term the Neocons obviously figured out that picking a candidate who is FIXATED on a object or a goal from the get go was the best way the acheive their goals.

Candidates with one track minds are much easier to plan around.

Take George Bush for instance. Even as he was sitting in that classroom with those children, for 45 mins reading a upside down book. while terrorist were slamming airliners into the twin towers. the Neocons could feel confident, and so could Osama Bin Laden, that Bush even at that moment was FIXATED on attacking Iraq. At that Moment the Neocons could plan their pillage around that scenerio. They Knew that Bush would lie, cheat and steal to acheive his goal.

As far a McCain goes, It is very apparent that he is already FIXATED on attacking Iran. The Neocons already know that McCain will also Lie, Cheat and Steal to acheive his goal.

So do I.

You know -- I am always amused at the fact that most liberals don't even know what the word neocon actually means -- so they throw it at everything, hoping it sticks somewhere.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocon

__________________
Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

---- Ronald Reagan

Thanks to Bush and Cheney the word Neocon is firmly plastered in sewer drains world wide.

But thanks for the education.

So ... now everybody knows that neocons are just liberals who have come to their senses!!

__________________
Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

---- Ronald Reagan

yeah, liberals who love war and pander to conservatives...

__________________
https://www.voteforchange.com/

Apparently so --

I didn't write the definition, I just reported it.

__________________
Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

---- Ronald Reagan

It sounds like you're talking about Lieberman.

yeah, i dont think you read it either. neocons arent necessarily libs or even ex-libs. theyre cons who love war, and ex-libs who jump on the bandwagon.

__________________
https://www.voteforchange.com/

neo-cons are the worst of all political worlds- they're not conservative because they love huge government and huge taxes to police the population and the world, generally restricting democracy wherever it emerges; all of this because of there upper-class backgrounds which teach them not to think the rules apply to them, they own the world, if anyone tries to hold them accountable they (*)(*)(*)(*) themselves (whenever Cheney was told recently approval ratings for Iraq and the Bush administration were at an all time-low, his response was "So?")
They're are no positive outcomes to them being statist, which they're can be from advocates of such a system, like welfare or any kind of assistance to the population- Neo-cons hate the poor because they are the most potential force for democracy, and demoralize them at every opportunity. Conservatives who like them are idiots, and republicans in general are idiots for thinking that neo-cons are freedom fighters they perceive them to be.

In fact not so. These are people who used to be the wild-eyed bomb-throwing Trotskyists of the 1960s and 1970s. Horowitz is a fine example. They were nutters then and they're nutters now, it's just that they lurched from extreme left to extreme right and man they didn't stop in between for as long as it would take to drink a milkshake. That noise you right wingers heard a few years ago was the ex-Trots rocketing past you to claim the extreme right from the old John Birchers and other slouchers that were hanging out there not doing much. You see these ex-Trot nutters actually got Iraq invaded! A Bircher would never have achieved that.

Sucked in you are, well sucked in.