Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2004, 10:23 PM
ElLider's Avatar
ElLider ElLider is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SLC
Posts: 96
ElLider is on a distinguished road
Credits: 832
Default Defining Ideological Differences

It is all about moral clarity..

Why Democrats are tagged as the party without values
Dennis Prager (back to web version) | Send


November 9, 2004


According to The New York Times, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, reflecting on her party's recent losses in the presidential, Senate and House elections, asked: "How did a party that is filled with people with values -- and I am a person with values -- get tagged as the party without values?"

As one who was raised a Democrat and became a Republican only 10 years ago, I would like to answer Gov. Napolitano's question as honestly as she posed it.

Gov. Napolitano, your party does indeed have very many people with values in it. But the Democratic Party is no more representative of the average Democrat's values than the National Council of Churches is of the average Protestant's values. Both are far to the left of their membership.

Here is the Democratic Party as most Americans, including this John F. Kennedy liberal -- a New York City born and raised, Jewish, Ivy League-educated intellectual who lives in Los Angeles -- see it.

To most Americans, Michael Moore is a Marxist who has utter contempt for most of his fellow Americans, who goes abroad and tells huge audiences how stupid and venal his country is, and in his dishonest propaganda film, portrays the American military as callous buffoons. Yet, this radical was given the most honored seat at the Democratic Party convention in Boston, next to former President Jimmy Carter.

To most Americans, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are race-baiting demagogues. Yet they are heroes to the Democratic Party. Most Americans do not see their country as the bigoted and racist nation regularly depicted by both black and white Democratic leaders.

To most Americans, a man who wears women's clothing to work is a pathetic person in need of psychotherapy. To the Democratic Party, he is a man whose cross-dressing is merely another expression of multiculturalism. The California legislature, which is entirely controlled by Democrats, passed a law prohibiting any employer from firing a man who shows up to work wearing women's clothing.

To most Americans, Eminem is a vulgar nihilist who poisons young Americans' minds. To John Kerry he was a man whose anti-Bush hate video was worthy of endorsement.

To most Americans, obscenity-filled evenings should be restricted to R-rated films or a Las Vegas comedy act, not a major party's fund raiser attended by its candidates for president of the United States. To Democrats, those who object to such evenings are regarded as judgmental, hypocritical and narrow minded.

To most Americans, Hollywood stars are regarded as terrific to watch in films but also as narcissistic ingrates when, between private jet trips to Cuba and Cannes, they express their contempt for traditional America. That the Democrats have a veritable monopoly on support from folks like Sean Penn and Robert "Castro-is-a-great-leader" Redford may give Democrats a heady feeling, but for tens of millions of Americans it merely reinforces their belief that the Democratic Party shares Hollywood's values. Even The New York Times, in a post-election analysis, wrote of "the possibility that activist entertainers' fervent endorsements might have cost Mr. Kerry the election."

To most Americans, the American military is not only heroic; it is regarded as more important to safeguarding freedom than any other human institution, including the ACLU, the United Nations or the university, to cite three major Democratic Party affiliates. To virtually the entire Left, which includes the Democratic Party, the military is, at best, a necessary evil. Otherwise, the overriding doctrine is "Make love, not war." That is why Harvard still refuses to allow ROTC training -- and it is unlikely that either of the Massachusetts senators even finds that wrong, let alone as reprehensible as most Americans do.

To most Americans, gays are fellow Americans who happen to be homosexual and who should be accorded the same respect any fellow American is accorded. But most Americans also believe that America should retain the millennia-old definition of marriage as man-woman. They regard liberal judges who take it upon themselves to redefine marriage with contempt. And these judges are identified with the Democrats.

Whatever their views on abortion and abortion rights, the vast majority of Americans view the abortion of a viable fetus/baby (partial-birth abortion) as immoral. The Democratic candidate and his fellow Democrats repeatedly voted against a ban on this practice.

Gov. Napolitano, I hope that this short list answers your question about how it is that your party has gotten tagged as "the party without values." Indeed, the real question, as this observer sees it, is how has this party retained so many people who have traditional American values?
__________________
"Where there is no God, all is permitted." - Fyodor Dostoyevski
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2004, 02:55 PM
FlackBait's Avatar
FlackBait FlackBait is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 688
usa us california
FlackBait has disabled reputation
Credits: 3,555
Default Funny

Hi ElLider, I did read your article but I think there’s an even easier way to explain it.

Democrats are tagged as the party without values because people say the Democrats don’t have values over and over and over and over again until everyone believes it. I really don’t think it’s anymore complicated than that.

You should really check this out http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_show...eos_corr.jhtml

Watch the Convential Wisdom clip. It's really funny but so true lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2004, 06:12 PM
ElLider's Avatar
ElLider ElLider is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SLC
Posts: 96
ElLider is on a distinguished road
Credits: 832
Default Thanks for reading..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlackBait";p=&quot View Post
Hi ElLider, I did read your article but I think there’s an even easier way to explain it.

Democrats are tagged as the party without values because people say the Democrats don’t have values over and over and over and over again until everyone believes it. I really don’t think it’s anymore complicated than that.

You should really check this out http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_show...eos_corr.jhtml

Watch the Convential Wisdom clip. It's really funny but so true lol.
I don't see evidence of your point. Who are these 'people'?

Truth is that the Democrats who are in leadership positions with the party, liberal commentators in the media and leftwing pundits consistently fail to accurately represent the sentiment of the majority of the people of this country.. Including Democrats..

Refer to this line in the article:

[/b]Gov. Napolitano, your party does indeed have very many people with values in it. But the Democratic Party is no more representative of the average Democrat's values than the National Council of Churches is of the average Protestant's values. Both are far to the left of their membership.

..Noone is saying that Democrats in general are wanting for values.. The point was that the leadership is not representative..

Consequently, Dennis ends with this question, "Indeed, the real question is how has this party retained so many people who have traditional American values?"
__________________
"Where there is no God, all is permitted." - Fyodor Dostoyevski
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2004, 09:02 PM
bktx1 bktx1 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 577
bktx1 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,867
Default Elider, I think you are square on it

The Democrats, like the left in general, is overreaching and out of touch with their core constituency. I would call it the Ivory Tower syndrome, listening to their own press too much and being out of touch with the base.

Your analogy to many religious denominations rings true.


I have to say one more thing, however. I believe the far right is misinterpreting election results as a mandate. It could very well be that the people are repudiating the out of touch left, not necessarily endorsing the far right. If the far right overeaches, we could have a repeat of the '94 elections in 2006.

I am a pragmatist, shoot me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden