Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


View Poll Results: Read the post, then vote!
Yes, this is a hate crime and should be treated as such. Yes, it should be covered more. 5 22.73%
Yes, this is a hate crime, but there's no reason to hear about it at the national level. 8 36.36%
Yes, this is a hate crime, and the media not covering it might be indicative of racism or racist sentiments. 2 9.09%
No, this isn't a hate crime. No reason to report on it. 5 22.73%
He deserved it for dating a white woman. 2 9.09%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2004, 09:20 PM
hill0118 hill0118 is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 334
hill0118 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,963
Default ..

The hate crimes laws are one of many laws that have outlived their usefulness and now serve as annoying reminders of why they were needed back in the 1960s.

A lot of what remains from the civil rights movement is outdated, and I agree should be changed.

The hate crime laws don't make sense because thinking is not a crime and it is a right of all americans to hate whoever the heck they feel like hating. You just can't regulate thought.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2004, 10:33 PM
powergrid powergrid is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2,080
powergrid is on a distinguished road
Credits: 10,081
Default .

Quote:
Hate crimes were created well after the advent of the kKK.
I'm not really talking about the advent of the KKK which was created in 1865, but it was a means of curbing some of the actions of the KKK. The first hate crime law was passed in 1969. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Hate_crime on the tails of the civil rights movement as a way to curb widespread violence against minority groups.
__________________
lambaste me not
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 07:52 AM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,058
Default Does anyone think

that if a white person were attacked by a black person because of his race, that it would be a hate crime?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 08:18 AM
EuP's Avatar
EuP EuP is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,247
EuP is on a distinguished road
Credits: 11,532
Default

__________________
What have you done for your people today?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2004, 02:47 PM
ThereseM ThereseM is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,569
ThereseM is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,380
Default Yes!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hansmoleman";p=&quot View Post
that if a white person were attacked by a black person because of his race, that it would be a hate crime?
This probably won't be especially popular but I have never been popular no use in trying to start now.

There are all kinds of crimes. Hate is one of those things that should be considered as part of a crime. Why? Well, let's say that the black man is sitting there eating dinner with his wife and a drunk driver rams through the the restaurant and kills him. The driver didn't hate him. He was drunk. It's still a crime but do you really want someone who is so consumed with hate to ever get out of prison? I don't! Hate is one of the most destructive emotions we have. Those who can't keep that emotion under control then needs to be locked up forever or be executed if that statute fits.
__________________
Those who think they know everything, usually know the least.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2004, 02:57 PM
powergrid powergrid is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2,080
powergrid is on a distinguished road
Credits: 10,081
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThereseM";p=&quot View Post
There are all kinds of crimes. Hate is one of those things that should be considered as part of a crime. Why? Well, let's say that the black man is sitting there eating dinner with his wife and a drunk driver rams through the the restaurant and kills him. The driver didn't hate him. He was drunk. It's still a crime but do you really want someone who is so consumed with hate to ever get out of prison? I don't! Hate is one of the most destructive emotions we have. Those who can't keep that emotion under control then needs to be locked up forever or be executed if that statute fits.
Because you feel that hate is wrong does not justify controlling it through the legislature. I don't like hate either, but I do not feel it is the state's job to regulate it by adding time to the sentence. It becomes a thought crime.
__________________
lambaste me not
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2004, 02:37 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,956
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 100,326
Default ...

Quote:
There are all kinds of crimes. Hate is one of those things that should be considered as part of a crime. Why? Well, let's say that the black man is sitting there eating dinner with his wife and a drunk driver rams through the the restaurant and kills him. The driver didn't hate him.
That is the difference between homicide and murder. Murder implies an intent to kill. Homicide is about negligence.

A better analogy would be a robber/extortionist who kills a victim for money, as opposed to a white christian guy that kills someone because they are a Jew. Should the robber get a lighter sentence simply because his motivation was greed rather than hate? Both of them murdered someone for selfish reasons.

That is what you are suggesting.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 06:27 AM
ThereseM ThereseM is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,569
ThereseM is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,380
Default I agree completely

Quote:
Originally Posted by powergrid";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThereseM";p=&quot View Post
There are all kinds of crimes. Hate is one of those things that should be considered as part of a crime. Why? Well, let's say that the black man is sitting there eating dinner with his wife and a drunk driver rams through the the restaurant and kills him. The driver didn't hate him. He was drunk. It's still a crime but do you really want someone who is so consumed with hate to ever get out of prison? I don't! Hate is one of the most destructive emotions we have. Those who can't keep that emotion under control then needs to be locked up forever or be executed if that statute fits.
Because you feel that hate is wrong does not justify controlling it through the legislature. I don't like hate either, but I do not feel it is the state's job to regulate it by adding time to the sentence. It becomes a thought crime.
Disregard my post I was having a liberal moment.
__________________
Those who think they know everything, usually know the least.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 06:54 AM
raven724 raven724 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 437
raven724 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,831
Default so much for a fair and balanced law

Just as an example of how backward this whole "hate crime" thing is when it comes to blacks and whites...

Years ago, in New York, there was a racially motivated attack on a young kid named Yussef Hawkins. It was all over the papers. The whites kids that beat this boy and then shot him to death were crucified in the media and in the courts. One kid that was part of the attack even had to move out of America (he moved to Italy) once he was out of jail because he feared for his life once he was out on the streets. He was still being crucified in the media long after he had upped and removed himself from America.

Now...

The very week before a white kid was wandering through a housing projects in Brooklyn. He was beaten by five blacks kids and stabbed to death. When the police caught the kids involved the next day the black kids were seen on the news proudly proclaiming their "accomplishment" of killing a "white fu**". That was about all the news it got. My uncle, who is a cop, told me that the blacks kids who beat the white kid got 6 months for the beating and were out in 3. The kid who stabbed the boy to death was released after 4 years.

The white kid, Joseph Fama, who had been the leader in the beating and the one who shot Hawkins, is serving 32 years to life in a maximum prison and has said on record that everyday he fears for his life and is beaten pretty much on a daily basis by black inmates.

Fair? Absolutely not. But than again, nothing when it comes to race these days are fair. If I call a black person a n***er (you can't even write the word!) I can be put in jail for committing a hate crime. If a black person called me a cracker or a white b**ch that's just fine by the law and most social standards.

So much for equality.
__________________
Be Alert: The world needs more Lerts
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2004, 07:07 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,956
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 100,326
Default ...

Quote:
Years ago, in New York, there was a racially motivated attack on a young kid named Yussef Hawkins. It was all over the papers. The whites kids that beat this boy and then shot him to death were crucified in the media and in the courts. One kid that was part of the attack even had to move out of America (he moved to Italy) once he was out of jail because he feared for his life once he was out on the streets. He was still being crucified in the media long after he had upped and removed himself from America.
Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?

The fact that the black kids got off too easy does not mean that the white kids didnt get what they deserved. Some justice is better than no justice. I'm glad they were made an example of.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden