Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:03 PM
Rusticus's Avatar
Rusticus Rusticus is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,407
usa us maryland
Rusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond reputeRusticus has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 13,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
I wonder what the result was for the question, "Would you like your child to be a homosexual?"
Or, if your child was in the military, would you want him/her to be forced to shower with homosexuals?
Or, if you had to give up a child to adoption, would you rather the child was raised by a heterosexual couple, or two gay men?
Or, If your ex-wife wanted to marry yours and her biological son, would that be OK with you?
I wonder what the result for the question, "Would you like your child to be a homophobic, right wing fascist?" would have been.

Or, if you and your wife died, would you want your child to be raised in an orphanage, by foster parents who were in it for the money or by a loving homosexual couple who would love your child and do their best to see that he or she reached their potential.

Your third question about your wife marrying your son is really too stupid to be addressed.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:03 PM
BigRed's Avatar
BigRed BigRed is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,457
BigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond reputeBigRed has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 54,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
I dont know what you base this belief on,.. but the bible addresses Homosexuality.

Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13

1st Corinthians 6:9 and 6:11.

I dont know if your trying to make an abstract argument,.. but God was pretty clear on the whole thing.
Not really. Homosexuality didn't become a concept until the 1800's. And even then, the concept isn't exactly what it means today. What it means today is a loving relationship between a man and a man or a woman and a woman.

The Bible at the time it was written had no way of understanding that concept. So to suggest God condemns such a concept makes no sense to me. Would God really condemn love? The greatest weapon for peace on earth? I doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:07 PM
algranny algranny is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,711
usa us alabama
algranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tresha View Post
Might you have links to any of these happenings?

Be happy to
Christian Photog Sued by Same-Sex Couple - U.S. - CBN News
Apr 15, 2008 ... After a photographer refused services to a same-sex couple, they sued for discrimination against their sexual orientation.
www.cbn.com/CBNnews/357084.

I've got no problem with respecting the voices of voters when it comes to some things. My hometown spent, oh...about 20 years voting on whether to allow beer and wine products to be sold out of grocery stores and such.
Big deal, drinkers would go to the next city.

But yes in fact, I have quite the problem when "majority" gets to decide when I'm allowed basic rights and protections. If nothing else because the level of ignorance shown is laughable.

This is based on your emotions and opinions, which could be just as ignorant for all we know


Tell me algranny, how hard have you tried to not be straight?
Being so certain as you are that my life is "merely a choice", how much effort have you put into resisting becoming gay?

Science determined that, not me. I simply chose to agree. Are you saying that humans have no control over their actions, surely not [b]

How much will power and strength of character did it take to "decide" to be straight?

Do tell.
No one has called me normal, I guess I just preferred males, seems to fit that way.
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:15 PM
Jellah's Avatar
Jellah Jellah is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: American living in Sweden
Posts: 3,625
Jellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 29,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by algranny View Post
Do your homework man, I have. The homosexual community is pushing for laws to be changed because "they will it". Well prostitutes, and drug dealers also feel our laws discriminate, should we change the laws for them? Should the laws be changed, Churches would not be allowed to discriminate. You are denying the fact that the agenda is to force a society to accept what they believe to be wrong. If society believed as you did the votes would have gone the other way. Where is your tolerance for those who disagree with you regarding marriage?
They are pushing for the laws to be changed because they are being discriminated against!

The fact that you try to compare gay people to prostitutes and drug dealers only highlights the fact that your position is extremely bigoted. The drug laws and prostitution laws are not what this thread is about...if you want to discuss those issues, start a thread but lets not hi-jack this one.

Churches discriminate NOW. They discriminate on the basis of gender dont they? Employers, notary, pharmacists etc cant do that though...but CHURCHES can..so dont try to tell me that churches are going to be forced to do anything. Gay folks are only asking for the STATE recognition and rights.

The churches cant even be forced to marry hetero couples! They turned down friends of mine because those friends didnt attend the church regularly so were not considered "members in good standing"....obviously they can discriminate and choose what couples they will marry and which they wont. This isnt about churches, its about state discrimination which should NEVER be tolerated.

My tolerance for those who disagree is fully in tact...I dont advocate that you have ANY OF YOUR RIGHTS stripped from you. I dont advocate that we strip bigots of their right to marry do I?

Its odd you neglected some of my questions....would it be ok to take away the right for inter-racial couples to marry? Thats a choice right? Can the majority vote for that?

You also never answered that if marriage is religous why you NEED a state license and why it must be a court that dissolves the marriage....dont skip over the hard questions.
__________________
"You can't go around building a better world for people. Only people
can build a better world for people. Otherwise it's just a cage."
-- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:29 PM
tresha's Avatar
tresha tresha is offline
Advisor
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: No one knows
Posts: 9,066
usa us texas
tresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 13,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by algranny View Post
That is not true. A lawsuit against a photographer was pursued, and won based on the fact that she wouldn't take pictures of a gay wedding. She was forced to pay 3,000 dollars to the plaintiff. Lawsuits are still being fought by Priests who refuse to participate in marriages of Gay people. Notaries, in Mass. have been ordered to perform gay marriages against their conscious, or go to jail. Please don't tell me it would have no consequence on the public that disagrees. THAT IS A LIE! Next who else should have this privilege, just because they think it is right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by algranny View Post
No one has called me normal, I guess I just preferred males, seems to fit that way.
I apologize, I should have specified. I meant about the priests being sued. I'd heard about the photographer and disagreed with the gay couple bringing suit.

(Just as an aside, when you add you own comments in the middle of someone else's quotes, but you leave them all the same color, it's hard to keep track.)

Please provide a non-biased, non-Christian or Fundamentalist based source that backs up your claim that [b]"Science determined that, not me. I simply chose to agree. Are you saying that humans have no control over their actions, surely not "

Yes, I have emotions and opinions about this.
Because yes, I am being discriminated against.
Are you married?
Have you ever had to take your spouse to the hospital?
When it was NOT a danger to your spouse, but rather at the whim of the idiot, biogted hospital worker who didn't like you for some reason, have you ever been ordered out of a room where your loved one was or ordered to sit there are not say a single word? Ever had to sit there in silence while you knew something horribly wrong was happening, but if you opened your mouth, you'd get thrown out, quite possibly arrested?


Don't talk to me about Powers of attorney when I keep telling you, unless there is a law that supersedes these arrangements, there will be times, these aren't honored!

I don't give a flying rat's patooie what it's called. Call it a marriage, call it a civil union, call it a freakin' toaster!
But if there were a law across the boards, across the states that says that yes, two consenting adults, no matter the gender, can legally enter into a binding contract with each other, then I wouldn't be sitting here griping about this.

As long as there are laws on the books that say it's up to a judges, or worse yet, a few hundred or thousand voters, to decide about MY life, yeah, I'm gonna speak up.
__________________
Even though I know I run the risk of it painting me in bad light, I just don't know that I'll ever forgive Kim for lying to JD about their son.

Last edited by tresha; 12-04-2008 at 12:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:15 PM
algranny algranny is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,711
usa us alabama
algranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tresha View Post
I apologize, I should have specified. I meant about the priests being sued. I'd heard about the photographer and disagreed with the gay couple bringing suit.

(Just as an aside, when you add you own comments in the middle of someone else's quotes, but you leave them all the same color, it's hard to keep track.)

Please provide a non-biased, non-Christian or Fundamentalist based source that backs up your claim that [b]"Science determined that, not me. I simply chose to agree. Are you saying that humans have no control over their actions, surely not "

Yes, I have emotions and opinions about this.
Because yes, I am being discriminated against.
Are you married?
Have you ever had to take your spouse to the hospital?
When it was NOT a danger to your spouse, but rather at the whim of the idiot, biogted hospital worker who didn't like you for some reason, have you ever been ordered out of a room where your loved one was or ordered to sit there are not say a single word? Ever had to sit there in silence while you knew something horribly wrong was happening, but if you opened your mouth, you'd get thrown out, quite possibly arrested?


Don't talk to me about Powers of attorney when I keep telling you, unless there is a law that supersedes these arrangements, there will be times, these aren't honored!

I don't give a flying rat's patooie what it's called. Call it a marriage, call it a civil union, call it a freakin' toaster!
But if there were a law across the boards, across the states that says that yes, two consenting adults, no matter the gender, can legally enter into a binding contract with each other, then I wouldn't be sitting here griping about this.

As long as there are laws on the books that say it's up to a judges, or worse yet, a few hundred or thousand voters, to decide about MY life, yeah, I'm gonna speak up.
Tresha, I sure am sorry for your problems, No I have no experience with your particular situation. I'm sure it had to be very hard.

However, I have had the experience of being a single Mother of 2, out of work, being told by an employer that he didn't hire women to work around his men.
I do understand discrimination, as I said the homosexual community is not the only ones that felt it. Sometimes you just have to accept what you can't change, right or wrong.

Again I am sorry for your pain!
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:20 PM
tresha's Avatar
tresha tresha is offline
Advisor
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: No one knows
Posts: 9,066
usa us texas
tresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond reputetresha has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 13,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by algranny View Post
Tresha, I sure am sorry for your problems, No I have no experience with your particular situation. I'm sure it had to be very hard.

However, I have had the experience of being a single Mother of 2, out of work, being told by an employer that he didn't hire women to work around his men.
I do understand discrimination, as I said the homosexual community is not the only ones that felt it. Sometimes you just have to accept what you can't change, right or wrong.

Again I am sorry for your pain!
I've never claimed the gay community was the only one who has felt discrimination.
And we will apparently have to respectfully agree to disagree. I don't have to accept what I cannot change, that's bull puckey.
I have to live within what the law is now, yes.
And fight like hell to get it changed. If people just sat back and did nothing, especially in the face of things that are wrong this world would be a much worse place than it already is.

And I appreciate you recognizing my difficulties.
__________________
Even though I know I run the risk of it painting me in bad light, I just don't know that I'll ever forgive Kim for lying to JD about their son.
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:29 PM
Tettsuo Tettsuo is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 857
usa us new york
Tettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond reputeTettsuo has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 4,464
Default

From my understanding, most are for civil union like arrangements that provide exactly the same benefits as marriage, but that same folks are against calling it marriage... no?
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:42 PM
Ironman's Avatar
Ironman Ironman is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 337
usa us washington
Ironman has a spectacular aura aboutIronman has a spectacular aura aboutIronman has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 2,019
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
Christians are to "resist" evil,.. and speak against it,.. God hasnt told his people to occupy a land and slaughter all that live there so that they wont take up their ways for a long time..
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Ok... One can be tolerant and still speak against evil. Tolerance is about the person and that person's right to a decision in the context of the place of coexistence. One can be tolerant and still speak against evil.
It is written that Christians are not to condemn the world, as they are allready condemned by he who has the authority to do so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
For example if you cannot tolerate different people in the workplace, you should be the one leaving.
What an interesting concept,.. in part I would agree with you but there is a major flaw in your argument.

Example: I own a Christian buisness and I intend to benifit Christians by giving them employment,.. a homosexual applies for a job and I deny him based upon his choice to engage in such activity.

Yup you see it comming on several levels,..

So after I'm sued for discrimination, and forced to conduct my buisness in a different way than I choose, My beliefs have been trashed, and If I or any of my employees speak out,.. or refuse to tolerate the homosexuals presence we are the ones that should leave?

I think not.

No one has the right to force me to go against my beliefs in order to make a living,.. oddly enough this was also written of in the Bible.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
School is another setting where different people must coexist. Wherever coexistence is inevitable, tolerance is a necessity.
Actually its a choice,.. and most Christians that are able home school.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Polite discourse is compatible with tolerance. Attacking, disrupting, or oppressing is not.
Luckily we are not bound to be tolerant of immoral behavior, so I guess the whole oppressing thing will continue.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
How can the Christians seperate themselves from the world? They are on this planet in vast numbers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
So? They still seem to think society is evil.
Actually GOD is the one that finds it abhorant,.. we just try to follow suit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Governments still belong to the proverbial Caesar.
Yup

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Plus most of them don't even do the most basic things asked of them in the New Testament
You dont have the athourity to make that statement,.. it reaks of ignorance and accusation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
and are basically CINOs.
I do not know what this means.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Hell, the really religious call them out on it when convenient (times other than when they need to talk about this being a "Christian country").
Christians are to point out sin to their brother in hopes he may be free from such. But I doubt that is what you refer,..

Rather I believe you use the self righteous to justify an attack upon faith.
Jesus said there will be those who will perform miracles in my name,.. but when they come to enter my Fathers Kingdom I will say I know them not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
The biblical term world applys to the lust there of..
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
And? Christians regularly buy from stores where people are made to work on the sabbath (not to mention companies that use cheap labor in corrupt nations). That is putting lust for material over principle.
And some do not. the point however is moot. Jesus when addressing the Pharisees was clear about the Sabbath.

You experts of the law, woe to you for you, for you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you will not lift one finger to help them.
Luke 11:46

What do you imagine he meant?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
That too is only sort of right,.. Lets use your words,"pick and choose"


People often choose to adhere to rules that have extreme moral consequence such as murder or sexual imorality,.. but they may completely over look coveting their neighbors house.

Is that because they picked that sin to harbor?,.. of course not!

What does paul say in Romans? I do what I dont want to,.. who will save me from this body of death? PRAISE be to the Lord Jesus Christ, for in him is my salvation..



Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Yeah, yeah. I know it's all about faith, not works. That's another pet peeve I have about modern Christianity.
You have misinterpereted both the example, and modern Christianity.
Faith without works is dead James 2:14-18

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
But I already gave the example.
Why put so much effort into legally excluding gays, but not for adultery, greed, working on the sabbath, etc.
I am not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
Homosexuality doesn't fall anywhere near the level of murder.
Thats not exactly true. First you must seperate based upon believers or non believers,.. the majority of the bible is for those who believe,.. what instruction could God have for anyone if they deny his existance?

Jesus said if you are guilty of one sin, you are guilty of all,.. why did he say that?,... so that we will not compare one to another and judge according to our standards because in the eyes of GOD we are all guilty.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
Its everything,.. the walk of a Christian is to strive for perfection,.. why would anyone compromise their values in one area just because they are weak in another. If an athelete is weak in one area does he let the rest of his body go?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
The fact remains that the choices of where to be strong and weak are not random.
You give no allowance for indivduality. I wont argue that people will be more acceptant of 1 sin over another,.. as they may view 1 worse,.. and that is a trap that Christians often fall into. However I'm sure at least an equal number have beliefs that are formed according to experience and it is by such their views are formed

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
The obsession with homosexuality is due to disgust, not morality.
You are in no position to make that statement,.. but lets say for the sake of argument you are correct and that none of those who oppose homosexuality for moral reasons,.. rather they are as you say "disgusted" by it,... GOD views it as detestable.

So what is your point,..

Christians sharing the views of their GOD?,...probably a good thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironman View Post
No, he trains harder, and works to strenghten that which is weak. Likewise we as Christians are to overcome through the power of the Lord. That is the way the Lord has directed us to seperate ourselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
And this has what to do with attempting to use Caesar's domain to control "sin" in others?
Nothing. But instead of trying to apply a response to a question other than what it was intended, lets put it in proper context and see how it works

JavaBlack is the whole "denial of faith" thing important?

Ironman Its everything,.. the walk of a Christian is to strive for perfection,.. why would anyone compromise their values in one area just because they are weak in another. If an athelete is weak in one area does he let the rest of his body go?

No, he trains harder, and works to strenghten that which is weak. Likewise we as Christians are to overcome through the power of the Lord. That is the way the Lord has directed us to seperate ourselves.


__________________
I can understand why people say "God bless America",.. what I cannot grasp is why he should.

Last edited by Ironman; 12-04-2008 at 01:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:44 PM
algranny algranny is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,711
usa us alabama
algranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond reputealgranny has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tresha View Post
I've never claimed the gay community was the only one who has felt discrimination.
And we will apparently have to respectfully agree to disagree. I don't have to accept what I cannot change, that's bull puckey.
I have to live within what the law is now, yes.
And fight like hell to get it changed. If people just sat back and did nothing, especially in the face of things that are wrong this world would be a much worse place than it already is.

And I appreciate you recognizing my difficulties.
This world is not fair, we all know that! As I stated, the laws may change in time, but pushing people to change their minds about something fundamentally
important to them will not change your situation.
We will respectfully agree to disagree. Good Luck with your circumstance
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
History Favors Republicans in 2010 cassowary Political Opinions & Beliefs 0 11-13-2008 08:41 PM
Bush's Brain favors Obama Sly Elections & Campaigns 3 10-30-2008 08:38 AM
Comprehensive Survey of Economists Favors Obama's Plan Pro Deus Et Patria Elections & Campaigns 21 09-16-2008 11:58 AM
Another Guy McCain Did Favors for f0ca1 Elections & Campaigns 6 05-16-2008 06:05 PM
Electoral Map Favors Democrats f0ca1 Elections & Campaigns 2 04-26-2008 07:05 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden