Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:19 AM
powergrid powergrid is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2,080
powergrid is on a distinguished road
Credits: 10,080
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinX";p=&quot View Post
Indeed it does. What's your point?
The point being that evolutionary theory and creationist theory does not contradict in this area.
__________________
lambaste me not
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:20 AM
pinniped pinniped is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,838
pinniped is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,579
Default okay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p=&quot View Post
"That is even more farfetched. Behavioral? So if a whale beaches itself, in your world it doesn't die, but rather it creates a whole new species! I get it."

Actually... in my world a whale is a mammal....
have it your way then, a trout beaches itself and instead of dying it spawns a new species due to its "changed attitude"...

Do they have to listen to motivational tapes to do this? How do they pull it off?
__________________
"You sound like a gen-x coffee house dick" - From the outtakes to Office Space
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:28 AM
audrasun's Avatar
audrasun audrasun is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BLFO
Posts: 950
audrasun is on a distinguished road
Credits: 5,071
Default dfty

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p=&quot View Post
"If imagery is used, then it’s not literal. For example, what “syntax” would make you believe that Noah got two of every creature on earth onto one boat? These stories are just that – stories. The point is to learn something, not to take it at face value. "

Supposedly, the Arc has been found.... Do I think Noah got 2 of every animal(except the dragon and unicorn) and put them on a boat? No... Do I think that he predicted a flood or was "told" of one, built a ship and gathered as many of his farm animals and family on it when the rains started? Yes....


Of course, I am NOT saying to take such things literally... I am saying that You and I do not and usually cannot understand the imagery used in such tomes... Take Jericho for instance...

Do I think God brought down the walls? Of course not... Do I think that the walls fell due to siege warfare? Yes!

We have to understand that the words used to describe such instances have no frame of reference for modern people.... The average grunt outside of the walls of Jericho had no knowledge of engineering and did not understand the sappers undermined the walls... So to the grunt, God brought down the walls.... and that is how the story grows....


Part of the definition of literal is “avoiding exaggeration, metaphor or embellishment”. The simple fact that instead of saying “The Hebrews crossed the Red Sea”, it says that the sea parted to let them pass makes it not literal. I can’t believe that the people who wrote it down didn’t understand that. (Come to think of it, maybe they understood it well enough to know that the average “grunt” would believe it.)

I remember being taught that the Torah, and by extension the Bible, should be looked at like Epic poetry. Embellished, allegorical, and not literal.

This is all an academic debate, but I just don’t understand how people can take the bible literally, but not every other book ever written. What the difference between the Bible and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, if the only difference between what’s literal and what’s not is the author’s syntax? Maybe that’s all true too and we just don’t understand Tolkien’s syntax.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:29 AM
kaladrew's Avatar
kaladrew kaladrew is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,554
kaladrew is on a distinguished road
Default a huge problem for religious people

"However, I fail to see how childhood cancer disproves the existence of a creator. '

explanations such as "God needs more angels" etc, are themselves childish - "free will" doesn't explain it either because there was no "will" to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:32 AM
MerlinX's Avatar
MerlinX MerlinX is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 1,491
usa us california
MerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 11,753
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim";p=&quot View Post
What you said is not quite correct.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html
Actually, that's matter of opinion. This link, for example, directly refutes Ms. Hunt's assertions...
http://www.thedarwinpapers.com/oldsi...r6/number6.htm
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:33 AM
pinniped pinniped is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,838
pinniped is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,579
Default good point

[quote="audrasun";p="101165"]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p=&quot View Post
This is all an academic debate, but I just don’t understand how people can take the bible literally, but not every other book ever written. What the difference between the Bible and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, if the only difference between what’s literal and what’s not is the author’s syntax? Maybe that’s all true too and we just don’t understand Tolkien’s syntax.
Good point...
__________________
"You sound like a gen-x coffee house dick" - From the outtakes to Office Space
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:35 AM
MerlinX's Avatar
MerlinX MerlinX is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 1,491
usa us california
MerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 11,753
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaladrew";p=&quot View Post
"However, I fail to see how childhood cancer disproves the existence of a creator. '

explanations such as "God needs more angels" etc, are themselves childish - "free will" doesn't explain it either because there was no "will" to begin with.
Sorry. I'm not following you at all. How exactly does childhood cancer disprove the existence of a creator? What does "free will" have to do the topic?
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:39 AM
Sinanju Sinanju is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,097
Sinanju is on a distinguished road
Credits: 21,632
Default .

"These scientists who don't believe something until they have it proven to them, correct me if I'm wrong about one thing, they don't know and haven't had it proven to them that the bacteria on Earth came from a meteor have they? Didn't think so. "

Actually they DO know that... they have found the crater and located the bacteria in a meteorite fragment... but keep on trying to "poke" the theory....


And, yet again, a trout is a fish...

And Audrasun... you and I are agreeing in different terms...

"I remember being taught that the Torah, and by extension the Bible, should be looked at like Epic poetry. Embellished, allegorical, and not literal. "

Exactly! BUT... the Epic poetry was trying to tell you the story of what happened.... It was a literal event that has become a "tall tale" in the telling....

Try "Eaters of the Dead".. it is a work of fiction of course but it helps illustrates how Beowulf could have very well been a real person that had his story turned into a Legend....

"This is all an academic debate, but I just don’t understand how people can take the bible literally, but not every other book ever written. What the difference between the Bible and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, if the only difference between what’s literal and what’s not is the author’s syntax? Maybe that’s all true too and we just don’t understand Tolkien’s syntax."

True.. and it really is a moot point as well... What I am trying to articulate here is that I also do not see how people can view the bible, or the torah, or the koran as LITERAL.... What I am trying to say is that those works have a historical basis and should be viewed as such.... Simply put, a person has to look past the stories of dieties and read between the lines....
__________________
I was banned from godlike productions(over 400 times)... and loved it.

"I haven't made you angry, have I?" -Malcolm Reynolds
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:44 AM
powergrid powergrid is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2,080
powergrid is on a distinguished road
Credits: 10,080
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaladrew";p=&quot View Post
"However, I fail to see how childhood cancer disproves the existence of a creator. '

explanations such as "God needs more angels" etc, are themselves childish - "free will" doesn't explain it either because there was no "will" to begin with.
So it is the why do bad things happen to good people refute. Maybe children get cancer becuase man kind is cursed by the actions of Adam and Eve, that man was kicked out of paradise and with that curse comes pain.
__________________
lambaste me not
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:47 AM
pinniped pinniped is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,838
pinniped is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,579
Default so they found an effin crater

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p=&quot View Post
"These scientists who don't believe something until they have it proven to them, correct me if I'm wrong about one thing, they don't know and haven't had it proven to them that the bacteria on Earth came from a meteor have they? Didn't think so. "

Actually they DO know that... they have found the crater and located the bacteria in a meteorite fragment... but keep on trying to "poke" the theory....
SO THEY FOUND A CRATER! Dude, any crater on Earth is going to have bacteria in it. That doesn't prove it is "alien bacteria" and that the bacteria started life on Earth. And, to state the obvious, there is no scientific consensus about there being life anywhere else.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinanju";p=&quot View Post
And, yet again, a trout is a fish...
What exactly is it then that you believe decided to leave the ocean and become human? Please tell us.
__________________
"You sound like a gen-x coffee house dick" - From the outtakes to Office Space
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden