Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim";p="
Plus, the archaeological evidence is so overwhelming that 99.9% of the biologists on earth agree.
I know there is always an issue when science and theology disagree, but in this case it seems apparent that the version of events as strictly interpreted in the bible simply did not occur. This raises another unrelated, but weird point you could help me with. The Old Testament is the Torah. Jews do not believe that the Torah is a literal document. Many Christians do. What is that all about? It's the Jew's book and they say it's not literal, but the Christians who borrowed it claim it is. Weird.
|
“Jews do not believe that the Torah is a literal document.”
Not true. Some believe it is literal, some don’t. I would be included in the second category. To me it’s equivalent to thinking Beowulf is literal. There’s some good themes, some sensible rules, but by and large it’s an interpretation of actual events, rather than a literal account.
I always assumed that Christians took their section to be literal – the NT – but not the Torah.