been thinking a lot about this war on terror and wars in general.... was trying to find a post to reply in, but didnt feel like arguing with people who still wonder "if bigger terrorist is ben laden or mohamad"

1. those people the media call iraqi forces, wearing masks to cover their faces fighting "insurgents". are they not terrorists? i would think that police should not only wear a uniform, but also a badge to identify themselves.

ok, so theyre not in control and are afraid of the many bad guys. (means bush/media lied). so what makes them not terrorists and those who fight them terrorist/insurgents? who placed them as officers? elected cabinet members? if so then why in the elections most popular people like Saddar were not included for being anti american? i guess to control who gets elected. and so how can you expect to end war where elections are rigged?

2. dropping bombs from hi tech airplanes after dissarming a much smaller nation of Iraq, is that not terrorism? if not, then i guess its more like a child molestation perhaps?

now here's an interesting thing: these guys bush and co. associate themselves with christianity. christianity teaches not to cast first stone etc. so these are criminals not only for lying but also for associating themselves with what they are not.

yet media doesn't seem to recognize and point these things out. instead they continnue calling those on their side legitimately nice names such as "police" and "iraqi forces" while those who are against this web of lies, bad names like "insurgents" and "terrorists"

why? i can come up with only one logical explanation: all these major networks are one and the same network as leadership/dictatorship.