Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:16 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,250
Default QUESTION

what if in 2000 the owners of twin towers would want to demolish the buildings because of some problems or simply a decision to build new ones? how would they go about it getting the permits and all, them being right in the middle of the city and surrounded by all these other buildings so close?

the reason im asking this is because the way they fell looked so much like demolition that it's suspitious
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:36 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,321
usa us minnesota
raytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud of
Credits: 97,237
Default dgdgdg

You're right. Because it would be difficult for them to get the permits, they hired people to fly airplanes into them and kill 3,000 people just to avoid the red tape....

If you're asking why the towers fell straight down instead of falling over, it's because the planes didn't have the impact power to knock them over, and the building's design (a weight-bearing external frame and an internal structure that automatically redistributed weight as load-bearing members failed) meant that a floor's support would fail all at once, and the force would be directed almost entirely straight downward.

In other words, good engineering.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:38 AM
stekim's Avatar
stekim stekim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,352
vanuatu
stekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to beholdstekim is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 51,461
Default

__________________
Do us all a favor and just kill yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:45 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,250
Default lole

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim";p=&quot View Post
Well, semi-good anyway!
right, anyway, my big red question is unanswered. or answered with sarcasm. if thats the best u can do ok i understand.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:48 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,321
usa us minnesota
raytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud of
Credits: 97,237
Default dgdgdg

Given how innovative the design of the WTC was for its day, I think the design was as good or better than we had a right to expect. The major flaw was the blown-on insulation on the steel beams. But to criticize that, you'd have to expect them to have anticipated a high-speed jet impact. Any other sort of fire, the insulation would have worked just fine.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 08:18 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,250
Default hm

so the building was built to last forever and ever and ever, right? like most american buildings?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 08:27 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,321
usa us minnesota
raytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud of
Credits: 97,237
Default dgdgdg

Quote:
Originally Posted by rikitz";p=&quot View Post
so the building was built to last forever and ever and ever, right? like most american buildings?
I have no idea what the expected lifetime of the WTC was. They certainly try to build them to last a long time. What's your point?
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 09:13 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,250
Default .

my point is that there is this theory (dont know if true or not) that twin towers many many offices were closed due to some problems like asbestus or something and they couldnt get the permit to demolish it....sources say that, dont know if these sources are as reliable as the ones who found Saddam was stockpiling WMD's but it's still a source.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 10:48 AM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,042
Default 9-11 conspiracy theories debunked

Popular Mechanics did an in-depth debunking of virtually every wacky conspiracy theory involving 9-11. Read through the whole thing, and THEN tell me that 9-11 was a setup....

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005, 11:00 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,250
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hansmoleman";p=&quot View Post
Popular Mechanics did an in-depth debunking of virtually every wacky conspiracy theory involving 9-11. Read through the whole thing, and THEN tell me that 9-11 was a setup....

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html
i debunk the debunkers with one paragraph: fake bin laden confession tape, invasion under false pretext.

i need not say no more to a functioning human being. any judge would dismiss all other evidence on basis of just one lie, we had mountains of them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden