![]() |
|
|
|||
|
what if in 2000 the owners of twin towers would want to demolish the buildings because of some problems or simply a decision to build new ones? how would they go about it getting the permits and all, them being right in the middle of the city and surrounded by all these other buildings so close?
the reason im asking this is because the way they fell looked so much like demolition that it's suspitious |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Given how innovative the design of the WTC was for its day, I think the design was as good or better than we had a right to expect. The major flaw was the blown-on insulation on the steel beams. But to criticize that, you'd have to expect them to have anticipated a high-speed jet impact. Any other sort of fire, the insulation would have worked just fine.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War. |
|
|||
|
my point is that there is this theory (dont know if true or not) that twin towers many many offices were closed due to some problems like asbestus or something and they couldnt get the permit to demolish it....sources say that, dont know if these sources are as reliable as the ones who found Saddam was stockpiling WMD's but it's still a source.
|
|
||||
|
Popular Mechanics did an in-depth debunking of virtually every wacky conspiracy theory involving 9-11. Read through the whole thing, and THEN tell me that 9-11 was a setup....
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html |
|
|||
|
Quote:
i need not say no more to a functioning human being. any judge would dismiss all other evidence on basis of just one lie, we had mountains of them. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|