Originally Posted by trodas";p=&quot

I get told that is bad when I say that WTC attacks never happen.

But that is jus not true. Sure it do happen. All I write is, that there is overhelming evidence that it was not done as we are told to be done. I see no proof the Islamic maniacs did it. But I see plenty of proof that US goverment pull it. As the pull the WTC7.
(BTW, Silverstein (jew) owned it ATM (WTC 1, 2 and 7) and has get insured the buildings AGAINST terorist attack (firt insurance like this ever) and for a record price, witch he collected. Still nothing ring the bell?)
There is a big difference in what I write and what is claimed I write.

I was not denny WTC 1 , 2 and 7 demolition.

I denny that any plane hit Pentagon as well, as any plane crashed in PA. That's true.

Did you ever seen plane crash site? Plenty of stuff are there. Manytimes almost complete plane is being reconstructed from the rubble. Certainly engines are the most intact thing, as they are made from most advanced materials known to mankind.
And like I said - show me the engines. Almost 3m in dimater and 6 meters long, weighting 6 tons - of the best material available - they are just what? Disapeared? How much stupid one has to be to believe in such tales and lies?
Same as the "official cause of WTC brokedown"... Flames? No skyscraper building ever collapsed because of fire. It can't. The burning jet fuel temperature is nowhere near the temperature of the weakening point of steel. In fact, the weakening point is twice as high as the maximum recorded temp in the north tower. And melting point is 3x the fuel temp. And now come the tricky part - the steel has thermal conductivity. Good one. So, with all experiments done, the highest temperature recorded ever in case of fire was about 360C - thanks to the cooling by the mass of steel, witch disapeared the temperature quite effectively.

And what about a brief history of time?
8:46 - WTC 1 (North tower) hit by Flight 11.
9:03 - WTC 2 (South tower) hit by Flight 175.
9:59 - WTC 2 (South tower) collapsed just 56min after impact.
10:28 - WTC 1 (North tower) collapsed 102min after impact.

Question - what WTC 2 go down in half of the time that WTC 1?
Notice that WTC 1 is standing just half and hour after the WTC 2 do down. This fact alone give in question the "wanna-be explainations" of WTC 7 pull... "The building was damaged and caught fire, arrrrrgh, terrible, we have to pull it..."

Notice that most of the jet fuel, from the second impact to WTC 2 get off the building when the plane ALMOST miss it:

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nalet%20na%20WTC%202.jpg
(What is that on the plane belly? I never seen airliner with such stuff...)

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nakres%2...%20WTC%202.jpg

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/zasah%20WTC%202-1.jpg

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/zasah%20WTC%202-2.jpg


That's a proof that the "pull" (short world for demolition) happen to WTC 7 on purpose and not thanks to being "weaken" from the falling debris and little isolated fire capsules, like we are told so.

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nakres%2...ni%20budov.jpg

As you can see, there are many buildings much closer to WTC 1 and 2 towers (WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5 and WTC 6), yet they aren't owned by the "right owner", so they stays and did not "collapsed" or not being "pulled"

And now a million dollar question.
How long it took to prepare pull of building like WTC 7...?

Originally Posted by The12thMan";p=&quot

Why do you continue to try to convince us of a vast Zionist conspiracy?

Originally Posted by trodas";p=&quot

I get told that is bad when I say that WTC attacks never happen.

But that is jus not true. Sure it do happen. All I write is, that there is overhelming evidence that it was not done as we are told to be done. I see no proof the Islamic maniacs did it. But I see plenty of proof that US goverment pull it. As the pull the WTC7.
(BTW, Silverstein (jew) owned it ATM (WTC 1, 2 and 7) and has get insured the buildings AGAINST terorist attack (firt insurance like this ever) and for a record price, witch he collected. Still nothing ring the bell?)

There is a big difference in what I write and what is claimed I write.

I was not denny WTC 1 , 2 and 7 demolition.

I denny that any plane hit Pentagon as well, as any plane crashed in PA. That's true.

Did you ever seen plane crash site? Plenty of stuff are there. Manytimes almost complete plane is being reconstructed from the rubble. Certainly engines are the most intact thing, as they are made from most advanced materials known to mankind.
And like I said - show me the engines. Almost 3m in dimater and 6 meters long, weighting 6 tons - of the best material available - they are just what? Disapeared? How much stupid one has to be to believe in such tales and lies?
Same as the "official cause of WTC brokedown"... Flames? No skyscraper building ever collapsed because of fire. It can't. The burning jet fuel temperature is nowhere near the temperature of the weakening point of steel. In fact, the weakening point is twice as high as the maximum recorded temp in the north tower. And melting point is 3x the fuel temp. And now come the tricky part - the steel has thermal conductivity. Good one. So, with all experiments done, the highest temperature recorded ever in case of fire was about 360C - thanks to the cooling by the mass of steel, witch disapeared the temperature quite effectively.

And what about a brief history of time?
8:46 - WTC 1 (North tower) hit by Flight 11.
9:03 - WTC 2 (South tower) hit by Flight 175.
9:59 - WTC 2 (South tower) collapsed just 56min after impact.
10:28 - WTC 1 (North tower) collapsed 102min after impact.

Question - what WTC 2 go down in half of the time that WTC 1?
Notice that WTC 1 is standing just half and hour after the WTC 2 do down. This fact alone give in question the "wanna-be explainations" of WTC 7 pull... "The building was damaged and caught fire, arrrrrgh, terrible, we have to pull it..."

Notice that most of the jet fuel, from the second impact to WTC 2 get off the building when the plane ALMOST miss it:

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nalet%20na%20WTC%202.jpg
(What is that on the plane belly? I never seen airliner with such stuff...)

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nakres%2...%20WTC%202.jpg

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/zasah%20WTC%202-1.jpg

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/zasah%20WTC%202-2.jpg


That's a proof that the "pull" (short world for demolition) happen to WTC 7 on purpose and not thanks to being "weaken" from the falling debris and little isolated fire capsules, like we are told so.

http://ax2.old-cans.com/WTC/nakres%2...ni%20budov.jpg

As you can see, there are many buildings much closer to WTC 1 and 2 towers (WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5 and WTC 6), yet they aren't owned by the "right owner", so they stays and did not "collapsed" or not being "pulled"

And now a million dollar question.
How long it took to prepare pull of building like WTC 7...?