Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:41 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default REMEMBER, IF YOU ARE NOT FOR BUSH YOU ARE FOR THE TERRORISTS

took this from spittermans sig, but needed to post this to make myself feel better about feeling sympathy for islamic "terrorists"
i've been conditioned to feel like some idiotic criminal in the past few years for simply dissagreing with bush and his bush it. when in fact i am a working man who uses brain, honest man, good human being.

Quote:
REMEMBER, IF YOU ARE NOT FOR BUSH YOU ARE FOR THE TERRORISTS
yes i am, guilty as charged.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:50 AM
nawbut nawbut is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlantic
Posts: 4,208
nawbut will become famous soon enough
Credits: 21,237
Default among the many

This was just one of the very very very stupid utterances of George W. Bush. 'Bring it on', 'with us or with the terrorists', 'mission accomplished'; it's not likely that these incidents of foot-in-mouth will in future times conjure the image of a 'statesman'.

Bloody idiot, more like.
__________________
"A man's work is nothing but this slow trek to rediscover, through the detours of art, those two or three great and simple images in whose presence his heart first opened."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 08:30 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default he can release CD with all "utterances" he's got

Quote:
Originally Posted by nawbut";p=&quot View Post
This was just one of the very very very stupid utterances of George W. Bush. 'Bring it on', 'with us or with the terrorists', 'mission accomplished'; it's not likely that these incidents of foot-in-mouth will in future times conjure the image of a 'statesman'.

Bloody idiot, more like.
here's another: "i hear you, the world hears you, and the people who knocked these buildings will hear all of us soon"
but i thought according to them the people who knocked these buildings were dead suicide bombers?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 08:41 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,635
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 143,324
Default You may want to get the quote right for starters

He didn't say if you aren't for Bush he said if you aren't for us, meaning the US. And it was one of the best and strongest moments of his Presidency. He was letting countries like Afghanistan (and the Taliban) know that you can either help us or you'll be treated like them. There will be no Switzerland this go around where you can harbor terrorists and fund them, but claim neutrality. I'm glad he said it, it was a great moment. One of his few.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 08:48 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,484
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,713
Default ...

Quote:
?: REMEMBER, IF YOU ARE NOT FOR BUSH YOU ARE FOR THE TERRORISTS

yes i am, guilty as charged.
um...who are you quoting?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:01 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default we are quoting George Bush the second

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadistic-Savior";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
?: REMEMBER, IF YOU ARE NOT FOR BUSH YOU ARE FOR THE TERRORISTS

yes i am, guilty as charged.
um...who are you quoting?
Quote:
Originally Posted by George W. Bush
You are either with us or against us
we are not with bush, so.....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:25 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,484
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,713
Default ...

If you were quoting Bush, then you lied about what he said. You distorted his actual words. He did not say what you quoted.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:55 AM
Heydrich4president's Avatar
Heydrich4president Heydrich4president is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 272
Heydrich4president is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,899
Default !

I aint no holla back girl, I aint no holla back girl
boom, clap
boom, clap
boom boom clap
boom, clap
__________________
Yes, I am a mindless, Brainwashed, robot,
AKA an American Infantryman.
Yet somehow I think for myself.....
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2005, 12:23 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default "you're either with us or against us"

Quote:
you're either with us or against us -----g.w. bush
well, definetely im not with him. so by his default i'm against him. who does that make me for?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 08:36 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,635
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 143,324
Default US being the key word

As in plural, there is only one GW Bush, not several. He was clearly referring to the US, not him individually.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden