Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007, 10:38 PM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,476
Default x

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daybreaker";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
"Disparities" in income demonstrate a healthy society. Societies will always contain people who work hard and lazy bums, people of great merit and little merit, people who are creative and people who are dead weight. A wide spread in income shows that society is rewarding people according to their merit, which is ultimately good for all.
How is it good for everyone for it to be bad for most people?
It ISN'T bad for most people.
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007, 11:04 PM
Daybreaker's Avatar
Daybreaker Daybreaker is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,217
Daybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud of
Credits: 10,405
Default But you said ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
"Disparities" in income demonstrate a healthy society. Societies will always contain people who work hard and lazy bums, people of great merit and little merit, people who are creative and people who are dead weight. A wide spread in income shows that society is rewarding people according to their merit, which is ultimately good for all.
The current wide spread in income has a few people making a ridiculous, staggering amount of money, and most people not making much. If capitalism is successful as a system of merit, then very, very few people are full of merit and most of humanity is worthless.

But even that isn't actually what you said. You said that it's good for all. Right after saying that it's not going to reward the majority of people who are, apparently, in your eyes seriously lacking in worth.

Can you please explain?
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007, 12:00 AM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,476
Default .

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daybreaker";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
"Disparities" in income demonstrate a healthy society. Societies will always contain people who work hard and lazy bums, people of great merit and little merit, people who are creative and people who are dead weight. A wide spread in income shows that society is rewarding people according to their merit, which is ultimately good for all.
The current wide spread in income has a few people making a ridiculous, staggering amount of money, and most people not making much.
Back this up with facts from a credible source.

Quote:
If capitalism is successful as a system of merit, then very, very few people are full of merit and most of humanity is worthless.
Once you expand it to all of humanity (thought we were talking about the US) you must note that capitalism is practiced in few places in the world, and the places where it is practiced are precisely the places where most people live better.

Quote:
But even that isn't actually what you said. You said that it's good for all. Right after saying that it's not going to reward the majority of people who are, apparently, in your eyes seriously lacking in worth.

Can you please explain?
I DIDN'T say it's not going to reward the majority of people - I've read your posts, and you need to read a whole lot more carefully.

Society works well, and for the benefit of most, when people are given their merited rewards or punishments. (work well, get a raise, work poorly, get fired). That is because such a system gives everyone the incentive to work well. If everyone in a society works well, that society is better off. But even when all try the best they can, some will do better than others because of greater ability. An analogy: Suppose there were two "societies" of five people. In the first, a socialist society, all five people make $10,000 a year. In the second, a capitalist society, the salaries are respectively $20,000, $40,000, $100,000, $150,000, and $200,000. The socialists of society 1 say "Bad capitalists - the highest earner earns ten times the lowest earner." So is it possible for a society to have a wide "disparity", yet be better off than a socialist society? Yes - and highly simplified, that's what's happened in the 20th/21st centuries.
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007, 11:44 PM
Daybreaker's Avatar
Daybreaker Daybreaker is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,217
Daybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud ofDaybreaker has much to be proud of
Credits: 10,405
Default Huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
A wide spread in income shows that society is rewarding people according to their merit, which is ultimately good for all.
Quote:
I DIDN'T say it's not going to reward the majority of people - I've read your posts, and you need to read a whole lot more carefully.
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:03 AM
greatamerican128's Avatar
greatamerican128 greatamerican128 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 822
usa
greatamerican128 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 4,679
Default Response

How can you support socialism at this point? China has abandoned it, Europe is moving away from it, Venezuela isn't doing so well, and Cuba is a complete failure.

Sounds like a successful system, let's not reward people for their work and rely on the non-existent "good" inside of them to work for nothing. Please give me a break.
__________________
“Good leaders abhor wrongdoing of all kinds; sound leadership has a moral foundation.”

-Proverbs 16:12
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 08:38 AM
KOD's Avatar
KOD KOD is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 344
KOD is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,112
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daybreaker";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p=&quot View Post
"Disparities" in income demonstrate a healthy society. Societies will always contain people who work hard and lazy bums, people of great merit and little merit, people who are creative and people who are dead weight. A wide spread in income shows that society is rewarding people according to their merit, which is ultimately good for all.
The current wide spread in income has a few people making a ridiculous, staggering amount of money, and most people not making much. If capitalism is successful as a system of merit, then very, very few people are full of merit and most of humanity is worthless.
This is exactly why it's necessary for a strong central government to step in and manage the dispersion of wealth in order to provide for the needs of society. No, I don't need to be reminded that this management requires a decision-maker to determine the specifics of the needs; that's what the definition of government is and should be. No one understands this concept better than Hillary Clinton.
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:04 PM
lockesmith lockesmith is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
lockesmith is on a distinguished road
Default really?

[/quote]
This is exactly why it's necessary for a strong central government to step in and manage the dispersion of wealth in order to provide for the needs of society. No, I don't need to be reminded that this management requires a decision-maker to determine the specifics of the needs; that's what the definition of government is and should be.[/quote]
You are extremely confused about what the definition of government "should be." The government has been instituted to insure the natural rights and freedoms of its people. It is supposed to rule with the consent of the governed. The government isn't supposed to be stong and centralized. If you want that, then make a time machine, go to 1940 and move to Italy. You would love it. FDR got a lot of his ideas from Mussolini and he actally admired Mussolini very much. "You cannoy help the poor by taking from the wealthy"-Thomas Jefferson. Theres this thing called freedom that this nation was founded on that makes it unique and you are proposing a shift away from that, that the founders of this nation were wrong. It is frightening that people actually think like that.


[/quote]How can you support socialism at this point? China has abandoned it, Europe is moving away from it, Venezuela isn't doing so well, and Cuba is a complete failure. [quote]
well put
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:15 PM
KOD's Avatar
KOD KOD is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 344
KOD is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,112
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by lockesmith";p=&quot View Post
The government has been instituted to insure the natural rights and freedoms of its people. It is supposed to rule with the consent of the governed. The government isn't supposed to be stong and centralized.
If you'll wake up and look at reality, the "rights and freedoms of its people" are provided for in spite of the "consent of the governed." Civil rights laws were never supported by popular demand any more than laws protecting abortion rights were supported by popular opinion. Government must make the difficult decisions that individuals just can't be trusted to make properly on their own.
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:20 PM
greatamerican128's Avatar
greatamerican128 greatamerican128 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 822
usa
greatamerican128 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 4,679
Default Response

[/quote] Government must make the difficult decisions that individuals just can't be trusted to make properly on their own.[/quote]

Good luck trying to take guns away from everyone, it won't work out too well.
__________________
“Good leaders abhor wrongdoing of all kinds; sound leadership has a moral foundation.”

-Proverbs 16:12
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:49 PM
Ivan's Avatar
Ivan Ivan is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 1,121
jordan us texas
Ivan is a jewel in the roughIvan is a jewel in the roughIvan is a jewel in the roughIvan is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 4,477
Send a message via MSN to Ivan
Default .

How bout some National Socialism?
__________________
"Duty is the most sublime word in our language. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." - Robert E. Lee
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden