Thread: Poll: Insane Patriarchy or Reasonable Matriarchy or What Else?

Wonderful Women, dear Men!

While Judaism, Christianity and Islam demand there would be one God only and that one would be a male, natural people demand the highest deity would be a Goddess.

Regard the effects: Crimes, lies, betraying, hatred, frustration, wars - that is the world of patriarchy. True natural people do not know crimes, lies, betraying, hatred, frustration and things like that - simply said beacuse they are living in accordance with their nature. But: The last word in all matters in natural societies is that one of the righteous and reasonable women - who regard the interests of all fairly, it is not any kind of depotism.


But do not think the men in natural societies would be soft eggs: The last people in Europe living according the schema of nature were the Western Teutones. No one liked to attack them - they were the bravest and horriblest fighters if they got attacked. But they hadn´t any interest to dominate other people, they didn´t try to occupy other countries as long as they had enough to eat.

Those Western Teutones were the only ones who rescued themselves from Roman occupation when Rome was at the height of power.

They adored their women, and they were absolutely happy with them. They prefered death in battle to captivity (without their women), they couldn´t imagine living without their women.

Humans aren´t built as singles: Even the human brain is not developed as an instrument of perfect thinking. The brain of a female is built in another way than the brain of male. Both are equally intelligent, but they think different: The man thinks stormily, doesn´t regard all effects, but just that makes him more creative in developing new ideas. He is the better producer of ideas. The woman thinks consideratedly, thinks about everything and in all directions. That is a barrier for creating new ideas, but she is the better verifyer of ideas, the better decider. Nature developes perfection, and human intelligence is perfect - if used in the right way.

The formula for that is:

"Mankind has to do what the righteous and reasonable among the women think is right when the disput of arguments, free and open for everyone, has com to an end - in small affairs, in large affairs, in all kind of affairs."

Indeed ignoring that law that founds on the evolutionary developed abilities of female and male brains means the downfall of mankind: Problems were bigger and bigger up to the point of our all end.

So it is really true: Following that rule above is the key to heaven on earth, but ignoring it is the key to hell and downfall of mankind.

I am prepared to fall down on my knees to adore all righteous and reasonable women, cause I know about the facts: Give the women back what it is theirs according to the will of creation, I would say according to the will of the highest deity who is our Goddess, and they will save mankind and give us all the heaven on earth. Clever deal, don´t You think so?

Look at Palestine, there You find Judaism, Christianity and Islam altogether, and then You know what´s about Patriarchy.

I appeal to all reasonable men to give their vote to Natural Matriarchy to let the women know that we are prepared for that. (by the way: The Western Teutones got absolutely (!) sexually satisfaction by their own wives....)

I appeal to all reasonable women to vote the same way to let know they are prepared for that, too. (By the way: The women of the Western Teutones got the same as their men and their men were absolutely trusty and all times very loving to them...)

With kindest regards by the name of United Anarchists

Your sincer

Winfried Sobottka

Some links that explain a little more:

What is your preferred system of government?

What is your preferred system of government?

http://www.sexualaufklaerung.at/unit...home/home.html

this could be us!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGi6jiD81Yw"]YouTube - The Film Crew (MST3K) - Wild Women of Wongo[/ame]

No civilization that has ever bore the hallmarks of an advanced society has ever been a matriarchy. Matriarchies only exist in societies which do not place high value upon intelligence or require great intelligence to survive.

Societies that relied on constant technological advancement, strategy, logic, and widespread diplomacy and political communication within a state or country and between many states/countries have all been dominated by men. Men happen to naturally excel at math, engineering, and reason more so than women.

If we wanted a simple society that praised our feelings over reality, wanted to make things pretty, and put all the effort into making sure our children stay safe and never grow up, then we can give a matriarchy a try. Otherwise, matriarchy is insane and men rose to power within advanced societies because men had the biological traits necessary to further the growth of the society.

People who yearn for matriarchies have clearly never examined why no technologically advanced society had ever been a matriarchy or given women any significant political power at all(short of the "no male heir" queens and similar examples).

Originally Posted by highway234

this could be us!

YouTube - The Film Crew (MST3K) - Wild Women of Wongo

I had been really curious which way the servants of Skull & Bones, of organized Jeweshry and so on would try to defame the reason of my article. But the way You take for that has been foreseen: It may be the primitivest way.

Originally Posted by German Anarchists

I had been really curious which way the servants of Skull & Bones, of organized Jeweshry and so on would try to defame the reason of my article. But the way You take for that has been foreseen: It may be the primitivest way.

did i just become a member of skull and bones? sweet!

Originally Posted by Mars

No civilization that has ever bore the hallmarks of an advanced society has ever been a matriarchy. Matriarchies only exist in societies which do not place high value upon intelligence or require great intelligence to survive.

What do You understand as the meaning of civilization? Hierarchy? Or what else?

Originally Posted by Mars

Societies that relied on constant technological advancement, strategy, logic, and widespread diplomacy and political communication within a state or country and between many states/countries have all been dominated by men. Men happen to naturally excel at math, engineering, and reason more so than women.

Sadly You are not really right. Women are as intelligent as men in all matters, but of course the specializings of both brains concern all matters, too: So it is not by coincident that Nobel Prizes get more and more won by mixed teams. Male intelligence produces ideas and female intelligence takes care that only good ideas are used instead of running in wrong directions, furthermore female intelligence takes care that everything gets best organized. If there is a winner team consisting of two males and one female, for instance, You can be absolutely sure that female couldn´t be replaced by ten men. You can name that limitational function of production, to say it simply: For coloring a wall You need color and a paint-brush. You can´t substitute the paint-brush by color, anyway how many color You would take for that. When I would be a pilot of an aeroplane and I could decide whether male or female engineers would attend my flyer I would say: "Female engineers!!!" without any hesitation. I am convinced the explosion of Challenger wouldn´t have happened if female engineers would have been responsible for the security of Challenger: They are thinking much more about everything than men.

Originally Posted by Mars

If we wanted a simple society that praised our feelings over reality, wanted to make things pretty, and put all the effort into making sure our children stay safe and never grow up, then we can give a matriarchy a try. Otherwise, matriarchy is insane and men rose to power within advanced societies because men had the biological traits necessary to further the growth of the society.

What a nonsense! No one can deny that current acting of mankind is digging our all graves and You call that taking care for the future of our children!

Furthermore You should read an article before You begin to criticize it: I don´t demand that women shall think alone - they shall have the last word only! That means all arguments have been presented and discussed before!

Originally Posted by Mars

People who yearn for matriarchies have clearly never examined why no technologically advanced society had ever been a matriarchy or given women any significant political power at all(short of the "no male heir" queens and similar examples).

What a nonsense! The Western Teutones didn´t live in trees, they were able to write, had all they needed. But thy didn´t build crazy pyramides, they didn´t build a Circus Maximus where people were killed for the sadistic enjoyment of frustrated other people, they didn´t develope anything they didn´t need. Do You know the Stones of Stonehenge? That was made by naturally living people!

The Teutones had a King and were willing to give up 300 of their women to the Romans in a peace offering after they were sorely defeated in battle. They were not your ideal fantasy matriarchy or a matriarchy at all for that matter.

Trying to place the failings of society on men is a joke at best and at worst an attempt to place the failings of humanity as a whole and of a small group of corrupt men and women squarely on the shoulders of all men. The world sucks, surely, but the divine wisdom of nature compels me to believe that maybe if we just killed off the beggars, the whiners, the primitives, the mentally deficient, and the good-for-nothings to make up for what centuries without lion attacks and a recent lack of intensive warfare have allowed to reproduce then maybe the world and our social problems would clear up much faster than trying to socially engineer women into power to satisfy a self-proclaimed goddess worshipping fanaticism.

Originally Posted by Mars

The Teutones had a King and were willing to give up 300 of their women to the Romans in a peace offering after they were sorely defeated in battle. They were not your ideal fantasy matriarchy or a matriarchy at all for that matter.

The Western Teutones hadn´t a king 2000 years ago and they would have never dealt with their women: What is the name of that king You are talking about, when did that happen where?

Originally Posted by Mars

Trying to place the failings of society on men is a joke at best and at worst an attempt to place the failings of humanity as a whole and of a small group of corrupt men and women squarely on the shoulders of all men. The world sucks, surely, but the divine wisdom of nature compels me to believe that maybe if we just killed off the beggars, the whiners, the primitives, the mentally deficient, and the good-for-nothings to make up for what centuries without lion attacks and a recent lack of intensive warfare have allowed to reproduce then maybe the world and our social problems would clear up much faster than trying to socially engineer women into power to satisfy a self-proclaimed goddess worshipping fanaticism.

That female and male brains are built in different ways is no joke. That both think in another way is no joke, too. And everyone knows that women think more consideratedly and that is the stop for abberations in natural societies.

And that stop has gone lost in patriarchy.

Originally Posted by German Anarchists

The Western Teutones hadn´t a king 2000 years ago and they would have never dealt with their women: What is the name of that king You are talking about, when did that happen where?

Teutobod

For future reference, "you" in English is only capitalized when it begins a sentence. I say this after a Russian lesson because if I was making grammar errors in another language I would want someone to set me straight.

That female and male brains are built in different ways is no joke. That both think in another way is no joke, too. And everyone knows that women think more consideratedly and that is the stop for abberations in natural societies.

Have you never seen women in their native environment? Women are capable of jealousy, pettiness, paranoia, violent mood swings, and general meanness that would destroy the world if properly armed. Women in America for sure are demanding, self-righteous, and emotionally unstable more often than not so I don't know where you're getting your magical super-women from but please share them with the rest of the world.

Btw, isn't "United Anarchists" an oxymoron?

Originally Posted by Mars

Teutobod

For future reference, "you" in English is only capitalized when it begins a sentence. I say this after a Russian lesson because if I was making grammar errors in another language I would want someone to set me straight.



Have you never seen women in their native environment? Women are capable of jealousy, pettiness, paranoia, violent mood swings, and general meanness that would destroy the world if properly armed. Women in America for sure are demanding, self-righteous, and emotionally unstable more often than not so I don't know where you're getting your magical super-women from but please share them with the rest of the world.

Btw, isn't "United Anarchists" an oxymoron?

Wow your such a woman hater.


Women, historically have always had active roles in their communites, homes, and such.. It was when we started becoming more industrialized that women started getting shut into their homes and isolated and their roles demeaned..