Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Other Political Discussion > Political Science


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2006, 09:25 AM
matthewbcurry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Defining a principle.

Is there a word that denotes an "ineffective use of human capabilities"?

Edit: Prior I had written concept, not principle. My intent is physical, it is not intended for spirituality; "knowing the mind of god(s)," may be inefficient. When contrasted with: progress, perfectability, and comprehending history, amoung other descriptive words, "knowing the mind of god" may not produce knowledge.

Concept: 1556, from M.L. conceptum "draft, abstract," in L. "(a thing) conceived," from pp. of concipere "to take in" (see conceive). In some 16c. cases a refashioning of conceit (perhaps to avoid negative connotations); conception in the womb sense was c.1300.

Principle: c.1380, "fundamental truth or proposition," from Anglo-Norm. principle, from O.Fr. principe, from L. principium (pl. principia) "a beginning, first part," from princeps (see prince). Meaning "origin, source" is attested from 1413. Sense of "general rule of conduct" is from c.1532. Used absolutely for (good or moral) principle from 1653.

Perfect: c.1225 (implied in perfectiun), from O.Fr. parfit (11c.), from L. perfectus "completed," pp. of perficere "accomplish, finish, complete," from per- "completely" + facere "to perform" (see factitious). Often used in Eng. as an intensive (perfect stranger, etc.). The verb meaning "to bring to full development" is recorded from 1398. Perfectionist is 1657, originally theological, "one who believes moral perfection may be attained in earthly existence;" sense of "one only satisfied with the highest standards" is from 1934.

Source http://www.etymonline.com/

We can complete a mathematical problem perfectly. Right? 1+1=2. But do we comprehend and denote the laws of the universe or multiverse perfectly? No, but we may improve.

A word that denotes an "ineffective use of human capabilities" may help guide us towards principles that will better our lives, such as perfecting knowledge. I am uncertain of what guiding principles we desire to achieve. Gathering together on an arbitrary date to celebrate the New Year, one which is not founded upon an earth-sun relationship, may not offer the necessary emotions we need in order to better ourselves; emotions such as the euphoria that was conjured up by ineffective capitalists that collected money from our familiarity of base ten numbers for the "year 2000" demonstrates our "ineffective use of reason" and an ambivalant attitude towards actively working to better ourselves. Perhaps a more effective capitalist principle would be to acknowledge the New Year on the Spring Equinox. This achievement may allow an increase in our ability to acknowlege, learn, and solve greater challenges. Generating a word that denotes an "ineffective use of human capabilities" will not generate a perfect society. The words we use have not generated a perfect society. They have aided our capability of bettering comprehension and denotation of the universe, or perhaps the multiverse. Does anyone know of a word that denotes this principle that needs to be rescued and reintegrated into our vocabulary? Is this a new definition that will enhance our perspective?

Be well, Matthew Curry

* this is in or around Ravenna
* no -- it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2006, 09:50 AM
Force-of-the-Truth's Avatar
Force-of-the-Truth Force-of-the-Truth is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oregon
Age: 23
Posts: 2,777
usa
Force-of-the-Truth has a spectacular aura aboutForce-of-the-Truth has a spectacular aura aboutForce-of-the-Truth has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 17,124
Default Inefficiency

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inefficiency
__________________
"Some people complain about the system. The system is not good, so they can't do anything. It's an excuse. Freedom is in your heart." (Jin Xing)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2006, 05:19 PM
matthewbcurry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Discussion of this topic is taking place in another Forum

4 November

This discussion is also taking place in the Philosophy Forums. Their web address is: http://forums.philosophyforums.com/

Originally I posted the discussion in three of the Forums: Philosophy of Politics and Law, the Philosophy of Anthropology, Sociology and Psychology, and in the Philosophy of Language. The discussion has been limited by the administration to the Philosophy of Language Forum.

Matthew Curry
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden