Quote:
Originally Posted by Hansmoleman";p="
but she is also a philsopher as well.
|
Right, not an economist. As a philosopher, her works are valuable, but economics is a hard science that fiction has no place in.
Quote:
|
She has written a number of essays and books on capitalism,
|
If you specifically meant her nonfiction works, you should have said that. She wrote far more fiction than nonfiction, and therefore is considered a fiction writer.
Quote:
|
By the way, she had plenty of experience in the business world. Why would she be less qualified to talk about capitalism than Marx was to talk about socialism (when he himself was never a "worker"?)
|
She wasn't less qualified, it's just that she wrote fiction, which isn't acceptable as far as hard sciences go. Her books are valuable to the philosophy of Objectivism, but not to the science of economics, with the exception of her nonfiction on the matter.