Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Other Political Discussion > Political Science


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2005, 04:12 PM
lyghtningrod lyghtningrod is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 576
lyghtningrod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,021
Default or...

Quote:
Originally Posted by lardbeetle";p=&quot View Post
Human rights abuses are not a part of the communist ideal, while they have resulted from said ideal. Seems to be a pretty big moral difference.
"From each according to ability; to each according to need."

That is a basic statement of communism, and a more egregious violation of human rights would be hard to find.
__________________
Never moon a werewolf.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2005, 05:49 PM
lardbeetle's Avatar
lardbeetle lardbeetle is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 537
usa us washington
lardbeetle will become famous soon enoughlardbeetle will become famous soon enough
Credits: 2,867
Default .

I suppose you could view it as stealing property. But theft still does not rank up with genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:37 PM
lyghtningrod lyghtningrod is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 576
lyghtningrod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,021
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by lardbeetle";p=&quot View Post
I suppose you could view it as stealing property. But theft still does not rank up with genocide.
It could be viewed as stealing a person's life, which is right up there on the bad scale.

I have heard way too many people say that communism was never implemented, but the truth is, it was, many times, and it failed resoundingly each time. As for the morality of communists vs nazis, I'll pass on both, thank you. I think history has shown both of them to be bad for people's health. I don't agree that communism has the moral high ground. Stalin alone killed two or three times as many people as Hitler did, so how can Hitler be evil and Stalin only misguided?
__________________
Never moon a werewolf.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2005, 08:31 PM
lardbeetle's Avatar
lardbeetle lardbeetle is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 537
usa us washington
lardbeetle will become famous soon enoughlardbeetle will become famous soon enough
Credits: 2,867
Default .

They were both evil, of course....
But I seriously doubt that Communists in this country would condone such actions. Nazis would. No arguments from me about the greater killer, but I am saying that communists in this country have good intentions, at least the ones I've talked to, and show no homicidal intentions...
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2005, 08:42 PM
lyghtningrod lyghtningrod is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 576
lyghtningrod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,021
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by lardbeetle";p=&quot View Post
No arguments from me about the greater killer, but I am saying that communists in this country have good intentions, at least the ones I've talked to, and show no homicidal intentions...
And we know where good intentions lead, right?

I personally think that the Communists are just more dishonest with themselves. They want the totalitarian result, but they put it in terms of freedom.
But it sounds like we both agree that these are not policies we want for ourselves.
__________________
Never moon a werewolf.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 11:55 AM
lardbeetle's Avatar
lardbeetle lardbeetle is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 537
usa us washington
lardbeetle will become famous soon enoughlardbeetle will become famous soon enough
Credits: 2,867
Default .

yeah. I don't support either system at all, but Communism is not necessarily at its core ethically corrupt, while Nazism is. Just saying that.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2005, 06:42 AM
LadyLazarus's Avatar
LadyLazarus LadyLazarus is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 356
LadyLazarus is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,384
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyghtningrod";p=&quot View Post
Lardbeetle,
you have your way of looking at it, I have mine. Communism is not something that can work, if only it were implemented properly. It is not something that was implemented poorly by China/Russia/Vietnam. In each of those cases the results were a logical result of the flaws built into the system. I keep hearing that communism was never tried in those states, but that is plain wrong. Communism was tried and shown to be an evil ideology that creates an evil state that destroys its people.
Russia killed maybe 30 million of it's own people, PRC about the same in trying to keep power. These results speak for themselves.
I agree with you that communism is a dangerous and impractical ideology, but it still very distinct from Nazism.
__________________
"Nothing is true. Everything is permitted." - Hassan-i-Saba
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2005, 11:25 AM
lyghtningrod lyghtningrod is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 576
lyghtningrod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,021
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyLazarus";p=&quot View Post

I agree with you that communism is a dangerous and impractical ideology, but it still very distinct from Nazism.
Sure they're different. I don't dispute that. Otherwise they'd have the same name. But the results are the same. Both kill people. Some people say they are at extreme ends of the spectrum, with Nazism being a far right ideology, and communism being a far left ideology. Since the left-right dichotomy is not a very useful model, I say they are both totalitarian, and leave it at that.
__________________
Never moon a werewolf.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2005, 08:26 PM
LadyLazarus's Avatar
LadyLazarus LadyLazarus is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 356
LadyLazarus is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,384
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyghtningrod";p=&quot View Post
But the results are the same. Both kill people.
The results are not the same. Fascism advocates a viable economic policy, whereas communism does not. That's the reason that communist states totally collapse and fascist states just change systems of government.

Quote:
Some people say they are at extreme ends of the spectrum, with Nazism being a far right ideology, and communism being a far left ideology. Since the left-right dichotomy is not a very useful model, I say they are both totalitarian, and leave it at that.
The four quadrant model is the best for understanding Communism and Fascism. There is a link in my signature the hlep you figure that out. Communsim rests at the top left of the chart, whereas fascism rests at the top, mid-right.

Also, there is a distinction between Nazism and fascism. Nazism is a specifically racially-fuelled subsect of fascism, and in my opinion considerably more dangerous. In my experience, most Nazis are stupid, violent, and crazy, whereas most non-Nazi fascists are polite, well-read, and peaceful, although seriously misguided.
__________________
"Nothing is true. Everything is permitted." - Hassan-i-Saba
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2005, 11:42 PM
lyghtningrod lyghtningrod is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 576
lyghtningrod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,021
Default or...

http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/.../anderson.html
"Everything for the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state." So Benito Mussolini trumpeted the ideal of fascism, the wild–eyed political movement that he rode to power in Italy in 1922 and that died with Adolf Hitler’s defeat in 1945.

That is Mussolini, advocating slavery. Do you seriously contend that slavery is a "viable economic policy"?

I have been using the four quadrant model since 1980, and am quite familiar with it. My scores on that same test you quote in your signature are
econ 6.4 and social -5.4.
But I disagree with the Political Compass version. I feel the original version is a more accurate representation of reality.

I am also aware of the difference between Nazism and Fascism. But the results speak for themselves. We were talking of communism and fascism, not Nazism and Fascism. I don't want any of them in my life.

As for being more polite, I may not have met any Fascists who were not Nazis. Don't know. But it really doesn't matter how polite someone is. If their intent is to dominate and control society, they are evil.
__________________
Never moon a werewolf.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden