![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If we didn't have a term like "reverse discrimination", we'd have to (gasp) honestly discuss the entire issue of discrimination and look at the varied ways in which it exists without the use of catchy rhetoric. That's upside-down discrimination against political hackery!
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!" The Tall Man, Phantasm III |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's time to re-examine the Innocence Project in New York, a group that seeks to free inmates through new tests. According to YOU and NIFONG, they are getting people like the man in this LINK out.....who are most likely really guilty. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in532165.shtml
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The term "reverse discrimination" is a legal term. It takes the Civil Rights laws....which don't include "white guys" and makes the case there it is "sometimes" used to discriminate against white men.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007 |
|
|||
|
Have you ever heard me say "reverse discrimination" or "reverse racism"?
And you won't. The TRUTH is that I am FOR discrimination and racism. I am tired of the proposed Utopia that you lieberals think this world should be. You want racism? Take a japanese family to Chinatown in San FranCrisco. And I think that attitude should be within their rights. Like the yeller fellas, I think that I should not be denigrated for my feelings... and I don't feel that anyone else should either. The year is 2006 and thought is a crime. Orwell had a typo.
__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it. |
|
||||
|
What am I missing?
The trouble with DNA evidence, especially in rape cases, is that women often feel compelled to clean themselves off before getting checked. That could possibly mean that guilty people are being let go due to the use of DNA testing, unless there's something I'm missing in all of this. That's why the particulars of the cases always need to be looked at. DNA is only part of the story. All I've heard about this case is the DNA stuff without any of the other forensic evidence that I might need to make a logical deduction. I hope the jury doesn't have this problem. Are people literally being let go on DNA tests alone? Because from what I understand, it is possible to do something bad without the DNA evidence being leftt, especially if someone gets rid of it. Frankly I have no idea in this case. And frankly I don't really have much interest in it. And it seems the interest of most people here involves using the case for some political reason, one way or the other. Perhaps the jury has a better idea of what's going on. I'll defer to them... Wow. That's easy. That's how our system already works. Not flawless. But it's probably for the best.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!" The Tall Man, Phantasm III |
|
|||
|
"The trouble with DNA evidence, especially in rape cases, is that women often feel compelled to clean themselves off before getting checked."
Do 'rape victims' who are 'passed out drunk' clean themselves in their stupor? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/04/13/D8GVCKT81.html "A woman who claims she was raped by members of Duke University's lacrosse team was described as "just passed-out drunk" by one of the first police officers to see her, according to a recording of radio traffic obtained Thursday by The Associated Press."
__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Though what if somebody else cleaned her? I bet her lawyers didn't think of stuff like this. Maybe I should go to law school.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!" The Tall Man, Phantasm III |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|