"There are around 2 billion Muslims in the world. Not all of these are extremists, therefore, I do not support the 'destruction' of all Muslims."

You are assuming as such. Just as I did.

The questions I posed were based upon my assumptions. Just as your response was based upon your assumptions.

I specifically stated that my questions used my assumptions, as such the answers given should be using the same assumptions.

It's a hypothetical.

So, don't dodge the question. Answer it.

ASSUMING I am correct, how do you deal with the worst offenders in society?

__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it.

Sounds like the usual problem with a tolerant society dealing with the intolerant.
So long as you let them get by and watch TV and take part in elections and all that crap, making sure that they simply aren't allowed to hurt others, you simply do what a tolerant society is expected to do:
tolerate them.
Like the nimrod Jew-haters.
When they act on their screwed up passions in a criminal manner, you arrest them.
But typically the democratic system, especially a tolerant one, will moderate these groups or at least shrink their numbers (their kids are smarter than they are quite often).

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

It is not an assumption that not all Muslims are extremists. I know that from first hand experience.


But OK, I will make your assumption. I would deal with them in an appropriate manner. Just like it is currently done.

__________________
It's the difference between suicide and slow capitulation... - Jim Morrison

"I would deal with them in an appropriate manner. Just like it is currently done."

So, you would invade countries that harbor them?

Also, you 'know'?

For sure??

Did you 'know' that extremists are told to befriend non-muslims and try to appear 'moderate'... so that it is easier to chop their heads off when the time comes? Read the Quran.

You know... heheh.

__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot ALL the DNA test came back and NONE of the boys matched. So, let's recap: the rape accuser says it was "white boys" and they made ALL the white lacrosse players submit to DNA tests. The one black player was not made to. The prosecutiion said it would give them the PROOF positive. The press, the public, and the prosecutor all had these boys guilty and was trying them in the press. BTW, the other girl with her that night is not backing her up either. Lawyers for Duke Players Say DNA Doesn't Match By DUFF WILSON and JULIET MACUR Published: April 10, 2006 DURHAM, N.C., April 10 — DNA evidence released today cleared 46 Duke lacrosse players from an accusation that three of them raped a dancer at a party four weeks ago, the players' defense lawyers said. None of the students' DNA was found on the woman or on any of her clothing or possessions or under her fingernails, the lawyers said. They said the accusation was false and based on the testimony of the one woman, a 27-year-old student, mother of two and a dancer who had been hired to perform at a party held by members of Duke's men's lacrosse team. " http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/sp...0cnd-duke.html Question: Could she be kin to Cynthia McKinney???

Reverse Discrimination, hmmmmm. For the sake of arguement lets say the roles were reversed and the stripper was white and the accused was the basketball team, would there have been any arrest by now? Would they have waited to search the so-called scene of the crime? Would they have waited for DNA tests? How would this thing be played out in the media. I don't know just go next door to Union, SC and ask the young black men in town what happened when Susan Smith said, "It was a black man that did it." By the way if I rapped a woman and I was wearing a condom would there be any DNA evidence left behind. My Grandfather used to say, "Where there is smoke, there is fire." Peace.

"By the way if I rapped a woman and I was wearing a condom would there be any DNA evidence left behind. "

Leave rappers out of this.

Anyway, IF you 'rapped' a woman and you were wearing a condom, THERE WOULD STILL BE EVIDENCE OF LATEX OR WHATEVER MATERIAL THE CONDOM WAS MADE OF...

There was none.

"peace"

__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it.

"My Grandfather used to say, "Where there is smoke, there is fire."

To paraphrase the Duke Lacrosse Team..

Tell him thanks for my cotton shirt.

__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it.

By 'them' I assume you mean terrorists. If so, that depends on a wide number of variables, so I can't give you a definate answer.

Yes, my non-religious Muslim friend is just pretending to be non-religious so he can cut off my head. And my other Muslim friend is just pretending to be my friend so he can cut off my head. And the Muslims that live in my area are just all pretending to be normal citizens so they can cut off my head.

Get real.

__________________
It's the difference between suicide and slow capitulation... - Jim Morrison

There WAS DNA found. What do you think they were testing? The fact is that it did not match any of the players.

Add that to the fact that she said she scratched one of them on the arm and you have further probability of finding DNA on her fingernails.

__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.

i'll play
supabadbro asks:assuming you hypothetically intend to ask whether - for consistency's sake 3 members - of the african-american basketball team were to be accused by the white stripper of having raped her would there be an arrest by now. using the same circumstances, that (1) the accuser is unable to identify which of the team members committed the assult, (2) there is no physical evidence that ANY of the african-american team members committed the assult, and (3) where there will typically be found a trace of DNA residue to identify the perpetrator, which material was not present, i will now ask you a question: which team member do you place under arrest? who would they have arrested prior to the DNA test results being performed?
on to your question asking how things would have been played out in the media:
we substitute "white" stripper with arrest history and vanishing support from second stripper who attended the party. we also substitute "black" basketball players on scholarship to an expensive, prestigious university having an "alarmingly" extensive arrest history for playing loud music, excessive drinking and even misusing a debit card to buy food.
i will stipulate, if you can answer which black students should have been arrested in this scenario, in a way which is different than the existing situation, then i will agree with you, there would have been a difference.
my bet on this game is that you can't