Right. Something is either racist or it's not. "Reverse racism" makes no sense. It's a stupid PC term without meaning. If you hate white people you are not a "reverse racist", you are simply a racist.

__________________
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.

Well in that case, I'll come inside now.


And JP, as pretty much everyone has explained (and as I clearly explained in my original post) there is no such thing as 'reverse racism'.

__________________
It's the difference between suicide and slow capitulation... - Jim Morrison

Actually, "reverse racism" makes it sound like the person is not racist.

__________________
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.

What, an "I'm rubber and you're glue" kind of scenario?

I personally think we ought to give a smack to whoever came up with that one. It's just some way to confuse people to the fact that racism is racism, regardless of who is doing it.

__________________
Tiger got to hunt, Bird got to fly, Man got to sit and wonder 'Why, why, why?'
Tiger got to sleep, Bird got to land, Man got to tell himself he understand.
~Bokonon

Reverse discrimination is real. I don't know why y'all can't understand. Affirmative action is reverse racism. It's not anti-white, it's pro-minority. It's not fair, but it's not racism. A person can be for AA and not be a racist.

__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.

You can only discriminate. You cannot "reverse discriminate". It's either discrimination or it's not. It makes no difference what color is doing it.

__________________
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.

Discrimination does not have a specific direction, therefore there cannot be 'reverse' discrimination. No matter where it comes from, or who it is aimed at, it is discrimination.

__________________
It's the difference between suicide and slow capitulation... - Jim Morrison

Look at it this way. You can discriminate because of your own racism, or because of other people's racism.

__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.

The motivation behind the discrimination doesn't matter. It's still just discrimination. Even if you dress it up to make yourself feel better, you can't change the true nature of it. You could spice me up in some nice pretty woman's clothes, but I'd still just be a nasty-a$$ dude.

__________________
Tiger got to hunt, Bird got to fly, Man got to sit and wonder 'Why, why, why?'
Tiger got to sleep, Bird got to land, Man got to tell himself he understand.
~Bokonon

the fact that most rape cases don't have DNA evidence doesn't matter because most rapes involve one person. But for her to be fighting several people and scratching them and not one hair strand, not one skin match, absolutely nothing out of all those guys? As most experts have said, that falls somewhere between highly unlikely and impossible.

I don't think it was racism as far as the case goes, although I do think it's racism when a crowd listening to her brother speak starts cheering when they say "how come these rich boys haven't been arrested?" Or start making accusations that if the reverse were true they would be in jail already. That is racism, race baiting, whatever you want to call it. The fact that much of the crowd cheered in support doesn't speak well of them either. Atticus Finch in reverse.

__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.