Thread: God Commands Racial Segregation--forbids Mongrelization

Originally Posted by l4zarus

To be fair we only have a handful of specimens so are knowledge of diversity then is somewhat limited. There are living homosapien sapiens today who don't look that much different from these individuals.

Or maybe, instead of looks, Neanderthals had great personalities.

We do know that they were very nice to the elderly and disabled among them.

Originally Posted by mikemikev

It can be. Mongrelizing with remnant populations that failed to evolve is a bad thing, for example.

So white people were a bad idea.

The Neanderthalers had evolve away from the mainstream of human evolution.

Originally Posted by mikemikev

Europeans now. Obviously they've been refined by 100,000 years of evolution. Compare that Neanderthal to a Rhodesiensis reconstruction to be fair.

that looks like my uncle

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

So white people were a bad idea.

The Neanderthalers had evolve away from the mainstream of human evolution.

Yes they had. But that doesn't mean white people were a bad idea.
Because they have other ancestors such as the super smart 400,000 year old heidelbergensis.
"Out of Africa" is a crock.

Originally Posted by mikemikev

Yes they had. But that doesn't mean white people were a bad idea.
Because they have other ancestors such as the super smart 400,000 year old heidelbergensis.
"Out of Africa" is a crock.

Just your uninformed opinion. There were, as far as the fossil record can show, no hominids in Europe during the crucial time frame.

There is no evidence that we are not descended from African H. idaltu or a closely-related African lineage. The percentage of our H. neanderthalensis genes is small.

Go get an education.

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

Just your uninformed opinion. There were, as far as the fossil record can show, no hominids in Europe during the crucial time frame.

There is no evidence that we are not descended from African H. idaltu or a closely-related African lineage. The percentage of our H. neanderthalensis genes is small.

Go get an education.

You gotta understand why Mikey resists this information. According to many people who hold his views, 1 drop of African blood makes you black. Meaning if we're all descended from African hominids, that means...according to racists twisted logic...we're ALL black.

Obviously he's going to cling to and misapply this otherwise interesting piece of archeological evidence as PROOF Northern European's (white people), have no genetic connection to Africa.

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Hey, Mikey! You'll like it! Turn that frown upside down cuz we're all brothas, dig!

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

Just your uninformed opinion. There were, as far as the fossil record can show, no hominids in Europe during the crucial time frame.

There is no evidence that we are not descended from African H. idaltu or a closely-related African lineage. The percentage of our H. neanderthalensis genes is small.

Go get an education.

Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperIn...?paperID=19566

Anatole A. Klyosov, Igor L. Rozhanskii Advances in Anthropology Vol.2 No.2, May 2012

ABSTRACT

Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat- eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

It's "Out-of Africa" theory for which there is no evidence.

Read it and weep.

Originally Posted by l4zarus

You gotta understand why Mikey resists this information. According to many people who hold his views, 1 drop of African blood makes you black. Meaning if we're all descended from African hominids, that means...according to racists twisted logic...we're ALL black.

Obviously he's going to cling to and misapply this otherwise interesting piece of archeological evidence as PROOF Northern European's (white people), have no genetic connection to Africa.

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Hey, Mikey! You'll like it! Turn that frown upside down cuz we're all brothas, dig!

Of course people with a little black ancestry are not black. They are mixed. That is just stupid.

Of course there is a genetic connection to Africa.

There is a genetic connection to primeval slime at the bottom of a pond 3 billion years ago when continents as we know them didn't even exist.

We are all descended from Africans, Europeans, Chinese, Monkeys, Amoeba etc.

What's your point?

The genomes of most modern humans are 1–4% Neanderthal — a result of interbreeding with the close relatives that went extinct 30,000 years ago, according to work by an international group of researchers. This suggests that Neanderthals bred outside Africa with Homo sapiens, who migrated out of that region about 100,000 years ago. On the basis of the fossil record of human migrations, the team proposes that this took place in the eastern Mediterranean. Therefore, they say, modern humans from Europe and Asia are closer genetically to Neanderthals than are those from sub-Saharan Africa. This agrees with the findings of a separate study presented at a conference last month. That study examined 2,000 modern human genomes that showed two interbreedings with Neanderthals: the first about 60,000 years ago, also in the eastern Mediterranean, and then again about 45,000 years ago in eastern Asia.

http://www.nature.com/news/2010/1005....2010.225.html

The evidence seems to suggest modern humans are derived from heidelbergensis flow into Africa.