You claim none are more authentic than another, yet you point to their existence to demonstrate that one was clearly "stolen". You dismiss your own evidence. You have done nothing to support an anti-biblical account. You say that the bible is accurate where it is accurate because it was "common" to fold fact into fiction. You then dismiss the entire thing as fiction, while accepting that there are indeed facts therein. You dismiss the entire thing as fiction because "it doesn't make sense to you" and "you have seen things like it in the past".
This is not a valid argument.
This is why I refused the Obama argument with you before. You are contradictory and unwilling to yield to facts. It would have really annoyed me to deal with that with the body of evidence I have supporting the theory... which, btw, I am willing to concede is incorrect. Until such time as you are willing to accept being wrong, arguing with you is futile.