Present arguments for your trust in science, without using your scientific texts...
One thing that frustrates the heck out of me, (and many others no doubt) is the circular nature of arguments put forward for science based on their scientific texts.
If you can come up with a decent argument as to why anyone should follow your particular god/religion called science without reference to that particular gods/religions scientific texts, I'd like to hear it.
I think it will be interesting to see who can do so, and who can't.
"THOUGHT. The operation of the mind. No one can be punished for his mere thoughts however wicked they may be. Human laws cannot reach them, first, because they are unknown; and, secondly, unless made manifest by some action, they are not injurious to any one; but when they manifest themselves, then the act, which is the consequence, may be punished. Dig. 50 16, 225."