Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilWriter
You know, TalkOrigins actually catalogs its sources. It has them linked at the bottom of every article on the site. You can check them, and read them. See, this is why people accuse you of being ignorant. Sometimes we use TalkOrigins as a source, because it's good and well-researched. Sometimes I use YouTube videos made by cdk007 and DonExodus2 (who is a Christian, incidentally), because videos are easy to watch. DonExodus2 also generally includes all his sources in the video info, making his videos especially valid.
|
I see you use other sources... So I'm ignorant because I DEMAND other sources from people who only use one?!?! Are you joking me? They are google experts... I ask for University findings and other sources and I get none... Go look at the evolution thread... It's WIKI or TalkOrigins or BUST!!! As I say bust - they do not rebuttal but resort to personal attacks...
Quote:
|
So why do you reject those sources? Do you reject the sources because they support evolution and abiogenesis? Just a hint, so does everyone in the scientific community. I mean, the majority regarding global warming is enough for them to call it a "consensus," but it may as well be a civil war next to the consensus of scientists that accept evolution as absolutely factual.
|
I reject all sources if it's the only source brought to the table. I pretty sure I could find a source that says Jesus is a black space man with 6 arms!! And the scientific community does not. When I was studying - a person from my class told me that some Chinese biologist said a speech and stated that, "In our country (China) we accept our Gov't without question because questions are not acceptable but we question evolution. In America you may not question evolution, but say blasphemies of their Gov't...."
Quote:
|
You, on the other hand, have no scientific sources. You have no links to peer-reviewed articles. You have no real dissenting evidence made by real scientists who actually know what they are talking about. So yes, the primary argument against you is that you are ignorant. Because if you were not ignorant, you would accept what all the informed people in the world already regard as fact. Because really ignorance is the only reason you would ever reject evolution and abiogenesis.
|
Funny... In order for a hypothesis to reach a theory one must be ignorant? To be a scientist one must be ignorant!?!? Did I understand this right? You are obviously not of this field because to be ignorant (as you so put it) is part of the job!! You can't go into science thinking everything is just true because Jonny Flashpants says so! SORRY CIVILIAN - not how we work!! If you can't sit and tell me everything about something, as a scientist (major in biology) I AM SUPPOSE TO QUESTION!!! If you want to be a sheep (which is 90% of this planet) go follow some herder on your own time! We scientist have work to do!! And guess what that is? To QUESTION - TO NEVER ACCEPT THAT SOMETHING IS PURE AND WITHOUT FALLACIES. Because guess what - nothing is... and it was someone who asked questions who found that out!! Not some blind follower like Right Wing Christian nutjob whom never owned a Bible let alone opened one.
Do you know who we are? We are the ones who you follow. You followed us when we said no man can run a 4 minute mile. You followed us when we said that blacks were half apes. You followed us off the ledge since the beginning - since Merlin or the Shaman. You are sheep because you are without question - I know what I am - I'm the keeper at the gate and your just a civilian... funny isn't it? I find it very funny...
01-05-2010, 02:21 AM
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
