![]() |
|
|
|||
|
1. Michael Hart , author of ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History’ said: "My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level.”
2. Annie Besant, wrote in ‘The Life and Teachings of Muhammad’ : “It is impossible for anyone who studies the personality of the great Prophet of the Arabs, and come to know how this prophet he used to live, and how he taught the people, but to feel respect towards this honorable prophet; one of the great messengers whom Allaah sent” 3. Th e British philosopher, Thomas Carlyle, who won the Nobel Prize for his book ‘The Heroes’ wrote: “It is a great shame for any one to listen to the accusation that Islaam is a lie and that Muhammad was a fabricator and a deceiver. We saw that he remained steadfast upon his principles, with firm determination; kind and generous…" 4. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the German writer said: “Us, Europeans, with all our concepts could not reach what Muhammad has reached, and no one will be able to precede him. Indeed, Muhammad succeeded to subdue the entire world to monotheism”. George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936. "If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam." “I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity." "I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”
__________________
JUSTICE LEADS TO PEACE ------------------------------- why jews had come from allover the world to occupy our lands? do they think that we will give them our lands with no cost? |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
__________________
JUSTICE LEADS TO PEACE ------------------------------- why jews had come from allover the world to occupy our lands? do they think that we will give them our lands with no cost? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Hebrew phrase Benei Elohim, often translated as "sons of God", describes angels or immensely powerful human beings. See Genesis 6:2-4 and Job 1:6. Many Bible scholars believe that this reflects usage in pre-Biblical near-eastern mythology. It is used to denote a human judge or ruler (Ps. lxxxii. 6, "children of the Most High"; in many passages "gods" and "judges" seem to be equations). In a more specialized sense, "son of God" is a title applied only to the real or ideal king over Israel (II Sam. vii. 14, with reference to King David and those of his descendants who carried on his dynasty; comp. Ps. lxxxix. 27, 2 Israel as a people is called God's "son", using the singular form (comp. Ex. iv. 22 and Hos. xi. 1). In the Tanakh the term itself does not connote any form of physical descent from, or unity of essence with, God. The Hebrew idiom conveys an expression of godlikeness (see Godliness) or great power. In Judaism the term "son of God" is rarely used in the sense of "messiah." Psalm 2 refers to God's appointed king of Zion as both God's messiah and like a son. I got that info from wikipedia so anyone who wants to check it out, be my guest.
__________________
“Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction. No universal selfishness can bring social good to all.” —Dr. W.E.B. Du Bois |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do not dispute these Hebrew etymologies. This may be what they were taught and it well may be true. But I wonder at what may be a deeper source. We know that this Bronze Age tribe probably wandered out of Sumeria and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean. Tradition also holds that the Hebrews were held "captive" by the world's then-super power Egypt. We also know that that tribe didn't read or write for some time after that. I think it is fair to assume that, if the "Chosen People" were indeed held captive by the Egyptians for more than a few generations, they would have incorporated some of the language of the dominant culture. If this is the case then I think it's fair to question the language as it would have been influenced by Egypt. AMEN may have been reduced to an acronym out of necessity. Your citation is silent on this question and I am not a scholar of ancient languages. Perhaps you can point us to an answer? |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
...and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean. Let's make that the Eastern Med. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
As indicated in the Bible, the Jews went on a bloody military campaign to conquer the promised land after they left Egypt. Obviously, slaves aren't very good soldiers. You are welcome to make more unsubstantiated claims. After all, the burden of proof is on you. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The Hebrews of this period invented a covenant with their invented god. This covenant was stored in a vessel we like to call and Ark (Ark of the Covenant). They have long since misplaced this "contract" but have nevertheless insisted on its righteous validity. Christians, for their own sense of identity, have embraced this canard. Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|