Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Religion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2006, 11:44 AM
taifbadr taifbadr is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: alexandria
Posts: 77
taifbadr is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,392
Default What WISE WESTERNS SAY ABOUT MUHAMMAD(PBUH)?

1. Michael Hart , author of ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History’ said: "My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level.”

2. Annie Besant,

wrote in ‘The Life and Teachings of Muhammad’ : “It is impossible for anyone who studies the personality of the great Prophet of the Arabs, and come to know how this prophet he used to live, and how he taught the people, but to feel respect towards this honorable prophet; one of the great messengers whom Allaah sent”



3. Th e British philosopher, Thomas Carlyle, who won the Nobel Prize for his book ‘The Heroes’ wrote: “It is a great shame for any one to listen to the accusation that Islaam is a lie and that Muhammad was a fabricator and a deceiver. We saw that he remained steadfast upon his principles, with firm determination; kind and generous…"


4. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the German writer said: “Us, Europeans, with all our concepts could not reach what Muhammad has reached, and no one will be able to precede him. Indeed, Muhammad succeeded to subdue the entire world to monotheism”. George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.

"If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam."
“I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity."

"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”
__________________
JUSTICE LEADS TO PEACE
-------------------------------
why jews had come from allover the world to occupy our lands? do they think that we will give them our lands with no cost?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2006, 05:48 AM
taifbadr taifbadr is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: alexandria
Posts: 77
taifbadr is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,392
Default Just take a look

http://www.politicalforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=14900
__________________
JUSTICE LEADS TO PEACE
-------------------------------
why jews had come from allover the world to occupy our lands? do they think that we will give them our lands with no cost?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2006, 01:54 PM
Schwarzwald's Avatar
Schwarzwald Schwarzwald is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 800
Schwarzwald is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 7,449
Default Prophethood, respect, and the truth about the son of God

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave";p=&quot View Post
Lord help us!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctiloquus";p=&quot View Post
Muslims always follow Mohamed's name with 'peace be upon him', but no Western media outlet does that. Mohamed is always called the Prophet Mohamed by Muslims, calling him the Prophet Mohamed is simply respecting Muslim beliefs. Just as calling Jesus, Jesus Christ, is showing respect to Christian beliefs.
Doc, calling Mohamed a prophet would be a lie, not a show of respect, unless that person actually believed that he was a prophet.

Calling Jesus God would be the equivalent of the respect that you are asking of Christians. I'll look forward to all Muslims calling Jesus God, out of respect of course.

Christians are not encouraged to lie, that would be sin. We are commanded to tell the truth, which is foundational for genuine love (1 Corinthians 13:6).

Can Muslims lie?
http://www.answering-islam.org/Index/L/lying.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Some Jews thought Jesus was a god, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaka100";p=&quot View Post
A jew that belives in Jesus is a christian
Amen, kaka.

What does Amen mean?
http://www.christiancourier.com/ques...enQuestion.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Apotheosis was common in those times and in those places. Mary's deification came later. Christians pay unknowing respect to Mithras and Isis when they pray to Jesus and Mary. Everyone who uses the word Amen at the end of their prayers (ancient Hebrew) may well be sending their thoughts to Amen-Ra, the great Egyptian creator-sun god.
You got half right. The Catholic deification of Mary is rooted in the Babylonian false gods, one of which is Isis.

Jesus was the first, all others, like Tammuz, are false christs. This is a summery of what the Bible teaches..

"The pagan cults of Greece and Rome were part of what are commonly called the mystery religions. By Pauls time they had dominated the near eastern world for thousands of years and indirectly would dominate much of western culture through the middle ages and, even untill today.

The mystery religions had many forms and variations, but a common source. In his vision on the island of Patmos John was shown "the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters," on whose "forehead a name was written, a mystery, 'Babylon the great, the mother of all harlots and the abominations of the earth'" (Rev. 17:1,5). Here the Lord pictures His judgment of the world religion. At the end of the Tribulation the true church will have been raptured (1 Thess. 4:13-18; Rev. 3:10) and the world will begin to establish a religion of it's own that will be truly universal. It will be the composite of all the worlds false religions, which will "give their power and authority to the beast, "the Antichrist" (Rev. 17:13). The final form of that all-powerful, universal religion will represent the completion of the mystery religions that historically originated in ancient Babylon.

In its organized form false religion began with the tower of Babel, from which Babylon derives it's name. Cain was the first false worshiper, and many individuals after him followed his example. But organized pagan religion began with the descendent's of Ham, one of Noah's three sons, who decided to erect a great monument that would "reach into heaven" and make themselves a great name (Gen. 10:9-10; 11:4). Under the leadership of the proud and apostate Nimrod they planned to storm heaven and unify their power and prestige in a great worldwide system of worship. That was man's first counterfeit religion, from which every other false religion in one way or another has sprung.

God's judgment frustrated their primary purpose of making a grand demonstration of humanistic unity. By confusing "their language, that they may not understand one another's speech," and scattering "them abroad from there over the face of the whole earth" (Gen. 11:7- the Lord halted the building of the tower and fractured their solidarity. But those people took with them the seeds of that false, idolatrous religion, seeds that they and their descendants have been planting throughout the world ever since. The ideas and forms were altered, adapted, and sometimes made more sophisticated, but the basic system remained, and remains, unchanged. That is why Babel, or Babylon, is called "the mother of all harlots and of the abominations of the earth" (Rev. 17:5). She was the pro generator of all false religions.

From various ancient sources, it seems that Nimrod's wife. Semiramis (the first), apparently was high priestess of the Babel religion and the founder of all mystery religions. After the tower was destroyed and the multiplicity of languages developed, she was worshiped as a goddess under many different names. She became Ishtar of Syria, Astarte of Phoenicia, Isis of Egypt, Aphrodite of Greece, and Venus of Rome--in each case the deity of sexual love and fertility. Her son, Tammuz, also came to be deified under various names and was the consort of Ishtar and and god of the underworld.

According to the cult of Ishtar, Tammuz was conceived by a sunbeam, a counterfeit version of Jesus' virgin birth. Tammuz corresponded to Baal in Phoenicia, Orisis in Egypt, Eros in Greece, and Cupid in Rome. In every case, the worship of these gods and goddesses was associated with sexual immorality. The celebration of Lent has no basis in scripture, but rather developed from the pagan celebration of Semiramis's mourning for forty days over the death of Tammuz (cf. Ezek. 8:14) before his alleged resurrection--another of Satan's mythical counterfeits.

The mystery religions originated the idea of baptismal regeneration, being born again merely through the rite of water baptism, and the practice of mutilation and flagellation to atone for sins or gain spiritual favor. They also began the custom of pilgrimages, which many religions follow today, and the paying of penance for forgiveness of sins for oneself and for others. (JMNTC)


God bless
Whenever Christians call the Holy Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) a prophet they arent lying because its true and some Christians see the Prophet as legitamate because in the Bible it states that God would send his message to all the regions of the Earth in a way suitable for them and other than His Holy Prophet you dont see any other prophets in the Arabic region. Also we Muslims call Jesus(pbuh) the Messiah, we acknowledge that on the Last Day he will be sent to raise the dead, and that everything in the Bible about him is true other than the crucifixion and the whole son of God thing. By the way I did some study; if you look at the Bible youll see that Matthew was the first person ever to call Jesus the "son of God" but whats overlooked is the Jewish meaning behind the term "son of God" because Matthew is Jewish.

The Hebrew phrase Benei Elohim, often translated as "sons of God", describes angels or immensely powerful human beings. See Genesis 6:2-4 and Job 1:6. Many Bible scholars believe that this reflects usage in pre-Biblical near-eastern mythology.
It is used to denote a human judge or ruler (Ps. lxxxii. 6, "children of the Most High"; in many passages "gods" and "judges" seem to be equations). In a more specialized sense, "son of God" is a title applied only to the real or ideal king over Israel (II Sam. vii. 14, with reference to King David and those of his descendants who carried on his dynasty; comp. Ps. lxxxix. 27, 2.
Israel as a people is called God's "son", using the singular form (comp. Ex. iv. 22 and Hos. xi. 1).
In the Tanakh the term itself does not connote any form of physical descent from, or unity of essence with, God. The Hebrew idiom conveys an expression of godlikeness (see Godliness) or great power.

In Judaism the term "son of God" is rarely used in the sense of "messiah." Psalm 2 refers to God's appointed king of Zion as both God's messiah and like a son.

I got that info from wikipedia so anyone who wants to check it out, be my guest.
__________________
“Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction. No universal selfishness can bring social good to all.” —Dr. W.E.B. Du Bois
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 09:29 AM
Jellyfish Jellyfish is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Ocean
Posts: 467
Jellyfish is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,332
Default Maybe not

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Some Jews thought Jesus was a god, too. Apotheosis was common in those times and in those places. Mary's deification came later. Christians pay unknowing respect to Mithras and Isis when they pray to Jesus and Mary. Everyone who uses the word Amen at the end of their prayers (ancient Hebrew) may well be sending their thoughts to Amen-Ra, the great Egyptian creator-sun god.
Let's see what wikipedia has to say
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen
In Judaism, it is taught that the word Amen is an acronym for A[l] (or El), Me[lech], N[e'eman] meaning "Lord (or God), King, [who is] Trustworthy." It is related to the Hebrew word emuna or "faith" with the same linguistic root, implying that one is affirming with, and of, "the faith" of Judaism (and its belief in Monotheism).
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 12:20 PM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,059
Default The Origin of Hebrew May Be Mixed

Quote:
Quote:
Everyone who uses the word Amen at the end of their prayers (ancient Hebrew) may well be sending their thoughts to Amen-Ra, the great Egyptian creator-sun god.
Let's see what wikipedia has to say
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen
In Judaism, it is taught that the word Amen is an acronym for A[l] (or El), Me[lech], N[e'eman] meaning "Lord (or God), King, [who is] Trustworthy." It is related to the Hebrew word emuna or "faith" with the same linguistic root, implying that one is affirming with, and of, "the faith" of Judaism (and its belief in Monotheism).
[/quote]
I do not dispute these Hebrew etymologies. This may be what they were taught and it well may be true. But I wonder at what may be a deeper source. We know that this Bronze Age tribe probably wandered out of Sumeria and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean. Tradition also holds that the Hebrews were held "captive" by the world's then-super power Egypt. We also know that that tribe didn't read or write for some time after that. I think it is fair to assume that, if the "Chosen People" were indeed held captive by the Egyptians for more than a few generations, they would have incorporated some of the language of the dominant culture. If this is the case then I think it's fair to question the language as it would have been influenced by Egypt. AMEN may have been reduced to an acronym out of necessity.
Your citation is silent on this question and I am not a scholar of ancient languages. Perhaps you can point us to an answer?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 05:58 PM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,059
Default Oops!

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Quote:
Everyone who uses the word Amen at the end of their prayers (ancient Hebrew) may well be sending their thoughts to Amen-Ra, the great Egyptian creator-sun god.
Let's see what wikipedia has to say
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen
In Judaism, it is taught that the word Amen is an acronym for A[l] (or El), Me[lech], N[e'eman] meaning "Lord (or God), King, [who is] Trustworthy." It is related to the Hebrew word emuna or "faith" with the same linguistic root, implying that one is affirming with, and of, "the faith" of Judaism (and its belief in Monotheism).
I do not dispute these Hebrew etymologies. This may be what they were taught and it well may be true. But I wonder at what may be a deeper source. We know that this Bronze Age tribe probably wandered out of Sumeria and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean. Tradition also holds that the Hebrews were held "captive" by the world's then-super power Egypt. We also know that that tribe didn't read or write for some time after that. I think it is fair to assume that, if the "Chosen People" were indeed held captive by the Egyptians for more than a few generations, they would have incorporated some of the language of the dominant culture. If this is the case then I think it's fair to question the language as it would have been influenced by Egypt. AMEN may have been reduced to an acronym out of necessity.
Your citation is silent on this question and I am not a scholar of ancient languages. Perhaps you can point us to an answer?
[/quote]
...and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean.
Let's make that the Eastern Med.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 07:31 PM
Jellyfish Jellyfish is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Ocean
Posts: 467
Jellyfish is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,332
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by apotropoxy";p=&quot View Post
I do not dispute these Hebrew etymologies. This may be what they were taught and it well may be true. But I wonder at what may be a deeper source. We know that this Bronze Age tribe probably wandered out of Sumeria and carved out some land for themselves in regions of the western Mediterranean. Tradition also holds that the Hebrews were held "captive" by the world's then-super power Egypt. We also know that that tribe didn't read or write for some time after that. I think it is fair to assume that, if the "Chosen People" were indeed held captive by the Egyptians for more than a few generations, they would have incorporated some of the language of the dominant culture. If this is the case then I think it's fair to question the language as it would have been influenced by Egypt. AMEN may have been reduced to an acronym out of necessity.
Your citation is silent on this question and I am not a scholar of ancient languages. Perhaps you can point us to an answer?
Jews lived in separate communities, and they went to great lengths to preserve their traditions then, and they still do to this day.

As indicated in the Bible, the Jews went on a bloody military campaign to conquer the promised land after they left Egypt. Obviously, slaves aren't very good soldiers.

You are welcome to make more unsubstantiated claims. After all, the burden of proof is on you.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 09:25 PM
apotropoxy apotropoxy is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,483
apotropoxy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,059
Default Provocative Speculations Are Not Claims

Quote:
As indicated in the Bible, the Jews went on a bloody military campaign to conquer the promised land after they left Egypt.
I do not hold the bible as a solid historical document in this regard. You may know that there is next to no evidence of a Hebrew captivity from the point of view of Egyptian history. I expect they were there, however. They just didn't rise to the notice of the Pharaoh's scribes.
The Hebrews of this period invented a covenant with their invented god. This covenant was stored in a vessel we like to call and Ark (Ark of the Covenant). They have long since misplaced this "contract" but have nevertheless insisted on its righteous validity. Christians, for their own sense of identity, have embraced this canard.

Quote:
You are welcome to make more unsubstantiated claims. After all, the burden of proof is on you.
I offered speculation and not claims.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2006, 10:18 PM
Mack's Avatar
Mack Mack is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,092
Mack is a name known to allMack is a name known to allMack is a name known to allMack is a name known to allMack is a name known to allMack is a name known to all
Credits: 9,709
Default .

Macks List of Mindblowingly Ignorant Posts on Islam:

1. Muslims call him a prophet but if they were more honest with themselves they would call him God, because that's what they've turned him into, just as the Cathlics have made Mary into God...

-Go read a book...Islam is noted for its absolute belief in the oneness of god. One of the five pillars of Islam is that one must state that their is no god but god, and Muhammad is his prophet. Not to mention the belief of all muslims in the principle of tawhid...stated as their is no god but the one true god and this god is one. Muslims believe so strongly in that their is only one god and that this god is one that some sects that no pictures of god can be drawn because they take away from his oneness.

2. "Every Muslim born male has to be named Mohamed, thus the prevaalence."

-I guess we removed the evil dictator Muhammed Hussein from Iraq then........





3. And finally...not really on Islam itself but...
Paraphraseed: The media saying the prophet Muhammed shows their bias

OKay...then the media shouldn't use the term "God." They show their bias because calling the being most religious people worship "god" assumes a higher being exists. Some people don't believe in this being so they should say the being that so and so worships.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden