Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Religion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2006, 05:11 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 15,344
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 102,566
Default Christian Evangelicals and Fundamentalists

I know a lot of people get fundamentalists and evangelicals mixed up (speaking of American Christian movements). They do tend to be more or less aligned politically.
I am ambivalent about these two groups for different reasons and, as a non-Christian, I feel that evangelicals do more to give me a positive feeling about Christianity... while at the same time being really irritating.
This is a simple light-hearted guide for non-Christians to tell these two apart by their immediately noticable pros and cons.
And yes it's very generalized. It's not really intended to be super-accurate. It's more of a semi-humorous look.

FUNDAMENTALISTS:
Pros:
*They tend not to bother you because they really don't care and figure if you're chosen, you'll just decide to convert.
*They don't really care much about adding things to school/public life (ie Intelligent Design, oraganized prayer time, etc.)
*They sometimes give to charity, mostly so that they can justify shutting down the government, which they fear is out to destroy Christianity.
Cons:
*They seem to care more about hating things that aren't Christian than liking things that are. They're about as pleasant as a root canal.
*They're very mobilized in political movements to remove tolerance of anything that doesn't fit their interpretation of the bible (ie gays, other religions) or their belief in what a holy culture is (ie other cultures)
*Tend to be pretty harsh and black & white
*The above-listed pros, while convenient, are mostly a result of their not giving a $%!^ about you at all. They're more likely to hate you forever (unless you're family- then they reluctantly put up with you) if religion ever comes up in a heated converstaion.

EVANGELICALS:
Pros:
*Very nice. Frightfully nice. You can't really dislike them no matter how irritating they are.
*More tolerant of other religions and cultures.
*They really care. They give to charity out of actual concern and annoy you constantly because they want you to be "saved".
*Less concerned with removing things they disagree with from society (with the notable exception of anything that involves killing- ie abortion, the death penalty; in the past wanted to remove evolution out of fear that it would influence social darwinism)
Cons:
*They will never stop hounding you about religion and will bring it up at very interesting times.
*Obsessed with the end of the world
*Motivated to add things to public/school life (ie Intelligent Design, organized prayer times)

Yeah, yeah. So in my experiences I've had a soft spot for evangelicals and generally find fundies to be irritating people. I went through a subphase of each back when I was in my Christian phase. It reminds me of Jimmy Stewart in Harvey:
"My mother said that to get by in life, you need to be oh-so-smart or oh-so-pleasant. I've tried both. I recommend the latter."

I can overlook the annoyance factor of the evangelicals because they're nice. They use the honey approach. Fundies on the otherhand are scary. They leave you alone... but you always get the feeling that they're plotting some kind of attack when you're not looking... and they're not so nice.
__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2006, 05:58 AM
stekim's Avatar
stekim stekim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,075
vanuatu
stekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant futurestekim has a brilliant future
Credits: 54,968
Default .

Georgia is filled with both. The two have a lot in common, so it's tough to tell them apart sometimes. But there are some differences. For me, fundamentalists tend to be more political oriented and hate filled. They are the true theocrats and really are a scary lot. Evangelicals tend to be "God oriented". They love to push their faith, but aside from that are more likely to leave other people alone. They are more concerned with getting to their version of heaven than fundamentalists, who seem fixated on recreating the world in their image.
__________________
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2006, 06:18 AM
nonsqtr nonsqtr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 6,049
nonsqtr has disabled reputation
Credits: 59,048
Default ..

Fundies are book-based, while evangelicals are experience-based.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007, 03:29 PM
WormChancellor's Avatar
WormChancellor WormChancellor is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 61
usa us georgia
WormChancellor is on a distinguished road
Credits: 663
Default Quick and Easy

Evangelicals are the mouth of God; Fundamentalists are the fist of Satan.

There, I said it. If you're offended, I don't care. Fundamentalists have been bringing down the noble and holy religion of Christianity for far too long. It's time these people were shown for what they really are: hate-filled, insecure, self-righteous Pharisees who do nothing but push people away from God.

Man, that felt good!

By the way, nonsqtr, great Ben Franklin signature.
__________________
Men of England, heirs of Glory,
Heroes of unwritten story,
Nurslings of one mighty Mother,
Hopes of her, and one another;

Rise like Lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number,
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you -
Ye are many - they are few.

- Percy Shelley, "The Masque of Anarchy"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007, 03:50 PM
GovernmentCheese GovernmentCheese is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,102
usa us north carolina
GovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,561
Default ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack";p=&quot View Post
I know a lot of people get fundamentalists and evangelicals mixed up (speaking of American Christian movements). They do tend to be more or less aligned politically.
I am ambivalent about these two groups for different reasons and, as a non-Christian, I feel that evangelicals do more to give me a positive feeling about Christianity... while at the same time being really irritating.
This is a simple light-hearted guide for non-Christians to tell these two apart by their immediately noticable pros and cons.
And yes it's very generalized. It's not really intended to be super-accurate. It's more of a semi-humorous look.

FUNDAMENTALISTS:
Pros:
*They tend not to bother you because they really don't care and figure if you're chosen, you'll just decide to convert.
*They don't really care much about adding things to school/public life (ie Intelligent Design, oraganized prayer time, etc.)
*They sometimes give to charity, mostly so that they can justify shutting down the government, which they fear is out to destroy Christianity.
Cons:
*They seem to care more about hating things that aren't Christian than liking things that are. They're about as pleasant as a root canal.
*They're very mobilized in political movements to remove tolerance of anything that doesn't fit their interpretation of the bible (ie gays, other religions) or their belief in what a holy culture is (ie other cultures)
*Tend to be pretty harsh and black & white
*The above-listed pros, while convenient, are mostly a result of their not giving a $%!^ about you at all. They're more likely to hate you forever (unless you're family- then they reluctantly put up with you) if religion ever comes up in a heated converstaion.

EVANGELICALS:
Pros:
*Very nice. Frightfully nice. You can't really dislike them no matter how irritating they are.
*More tolerant of other religions and cultures.
*They really care. They give to charity out of actual concern and annoy you constantly because they want you to be "saved".
*Less concerned with removing things they disagree with from society (with the notable exception of anything that involves killing- ie abortion, the death penalty; in the past wanted to remove evolution out of fear that it would influence social darwinism)
Cons:
*They will never stop hounding you about religion and will bring it up at very interesting times.
*Obsessed with the end of the world
*Motivated to add things to public/school life (ie Intelligent Design, organized prayer times)

Yeah, yeah. So in my experiences I've had a soft spot for evangelicals and generally find fundies to be irritating people. I went through a subphase of each back when I was in my Christian phase. It reminds me of Jimmy Stewart in Harvey:
"My mother said that to get by in life, you need to be oh-so-smart or oh-so-pleasant. I've tried both. I recommend the latter."

I can overlook the annoyance factor of the evangelicals because they're nice. They use the honey approach. Fundies on the otherhand are scary. They leave you alone... but you always get the feeling that they're plotting some kind of attack when you're not looking... and they're not so nice.
aren't these loose terms used by secularists? I don't find many people in society referring to such religious profiling unless secularism is involved.
__________________
And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country.

And he said, Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 05:17 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 15,344
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 102,566
Default ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GovernmentCheese";p=&quot View Post
aren't these loose terms used by secularists? I don't find many people in society referring to such religious profiling unless secularism is involved.
They are loose terms. They refer to two very broad religious movements, both of which are growing (especially evangelicalism), and thus important social movements. But of course most Christians belong to neither group last I knew.
The terms are not as loose as merely "Chistians". A lot of people will point out elements of either evangelical or fundamentalist movements and refer to them as "Christian", which ends up being inaccurate and often confusing/offending Christians not belonging to the same type of philosophy. To study a movement, there is trade-off between genarality and specificity. You must be specific enough to avoid blanketing too much and general enough to have meaning.
Of course within the movements are many different sects (especiallyy in evangelicalism), but they have certain common factors that seperate them from fundamentalists and mainstream Christians.
Fundamentalism is found in all major religions... but I think evangelicalism is found strictly in Christianity.
__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 05:25 AM
Tedminator's Avatar
Tedminator Tedminator is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 8,216
usa us florida
Tedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 35,837
Default ~

blah blah blah various christian sects.


The Roman Catholic Church. The One True Faith©
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden