Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Religion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:20 AM
Link S.'s Avatar
Link S. Link S. is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 377
usa us new york
Link S. will become famous soon enoughLink S. will become famous soon enough
Credits: 2,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usgrant7 View Post
When you stop trusting the FARMS spin doctors, and land with your feet firmly planted on the ground, tell how an antiquities seller who defauded his benefactors of the payment Joseph Smith made to him, qualifies as a "messenger of God".

And what does this mean?>>

Are you Tom Cruise and when did you become a Mormon?
I do not understand what you mean by FARMS. all the answers I give come directly from me and are not to be confused with actual doctrine of the church as I do not go on to Church sites that often and have not for the past several months. No I am not Tom Cruise But I would like to know if he is a mormon.

What I mean is that satan has many people under his power that will do anything to disprove the church's validity and I do not know the full story behind the Abrahamic scroll so you can look it up if you want while I try to find some info on my side.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:24 AM
Link S.'s Avatar
Link S. Link S. is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 377
usa us new york
Link S. will become famous soon enoughLink S. will become famous soon enough
Credits: 2,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usgrant7 View Post
If a Mormon quotes his own scripture, you might think that he would cite it properly. However, in the context of this arguement, we both have a common ground. We both believe that the KJV is inspired text. So by calling it out, I am holding the discussion to a commonly recognized standard.

The BOM pales when compared to the Bible. In circulation, in scrutiny, in consistancy, and in archeology. The BoM dies a little each time an Archeologist examines the evidence, where as, wheneven a shovel goes into the ground in the middle east, another Biblical critic is burried. To make the two to have equal footing is intellectually dishonest. 66 books writen by 40 authors, accross a great deal of time and opposition isn't even in the same league as a book that has been edited many times and fashioned to fit the whims of the body of presidents in Salt Lake.
Huh what a coincidence I use the King james version of the bible also. The book of Mormon has not been touched by the hands of man since its completion by joseph smith. The Bible on the other hand has been translated and retranslated and is different depending on the church you go to. There have been modern revelations added in the Doctrine and Covenants and conference talks but the Actual Book of Mormon has not been altered at all.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:26 AM
usgrant7's Avatar
usgrant7 usgrant7 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victor, NY
Age: 46
Posts: 577
usa us new york
usgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to all
Credits: 5,320
Send a message via MSN to usgrant7
Icon18 Grabing at straws...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Link S. View Post
Isa 14:13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

This was your post now that doesn't sound to me like lucifer wants to share power equally with god.
That's what the LDS church struggles with. A lot of things sound like things...

Here is the exact truth of the matter.

The Hebrew word "min" is positional, not in authority. Look at the next verse. "above the clouds".

Verse 14: And "I will be LIKE the most high".

The word "like" is the Hebrew word "damah" which is by implication "to be comparable or on par with".

Please post more carefully next time.
__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:31 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,321
usa us minnesota
raytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud of
Credits: 97,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usgrant7 View Post
The BOM pales when compared to the Bible. In circulation, in scrutiny, in consistancy, and in archeology. The BoM dies a little each time an Archeologist examines the evidence, where as, wheneven a shovel goes into the ground in the middle east, another Biblical critic is burried. To make the two to have equal footing is intellectually dishonest. 66 books writen by 40 authors, accross a great deal of time and opposition isn't even in the same league as a book that has been edited many times and fashioned to fit the whims of the body of presidents in Salt Lake.
Be that as it may, that's your opinion. Mormons think differently. If you want to question them about their belief, you have to let them explain it to you in their terms.

Now, I realize you're going way beyond that: trying to prove Mormonism is a fraud and that the Bible and mainstream Christianity is objectively superior. Which is rather rude, IMO, especially because Link did nothing to provoke such an aggressive response. It's rather like an atheist attacking you merely for noting that you're Christian. You'd think that was rude, too.

IMO, you have a lot to learn about tolerating beliefs other than your own.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:45 AM
catzmeow's Avatar
catzmeow catzmeow is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 12,266
usa us florida
catzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 62,618
Send a message via Yahoo to catzmeow
Default

Quote:
The book of Mormon has not been touched by the hands of man since its completion by joseph smith.
Bahahahahahahahahahhaha.

Do you really believe this?
__________________
Hedonistic Lemming

Billy Bob: "From now on I don't want to be quoted. EVER! "
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:52 AM
usgrant7's Avatar
usgrant7 usgrant7 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victor, NY
Age: 46
Posts: 577
usa us new york
usgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to all
Credits: 5,320
Send a message via MSN to usgrant7
Icon18 the Actual Book of Mormon has not been altered at all

Quote:
Originally Posted by Link S. View Post
Huh what a coincidence I use the King james version of the bible also. The book of Mormon has not been touched by the hands of man since its completion by joseph smith. The Bible on the other hand has been translated and retranslated and is different depending on the church you go to. There have been modern revelations added in the Doctrine and Covenants and conference talks but the Actual Book of Mormon has not been altered at all.
Hmmm... Tisk tisk tisk...

Joseph Smith himself made it very clear: (see Saint's Herald, November 15, 1962, p.16.) The Gold plates he recieved were translated letter-by-letter "by the power of God." (HISTORY OF THE CHURCH, i, p.54-55)

Yet...

First Book of Nephi, p.25 (1830): "Behold, the virgin which thou seest, is the mother of God, after the manner of the flesh."

Today: 1 Nephi 11:18: "...is the mother of the Son of God."

First Book of Nephi, p.25 (1830):."...behold the Lamb of God, yea, even the Eternal Father!"

Today: 1 Nephi 11:21: "yea, even the Son of the Eternal Father!"

B. H. Roberts claimed that since God did not give the English found in the Book of Mormon, the Church leaders had a right to make changes in it:
"Many errors, verbal and grammatical, have already been eliminated in the later English editions, and there is no valid reason why every-one of those that remain should not be eliminated ... There is no good reason why we should not have just as good a Book of Mormon in the English language as they now have in the French, the German, the Swedish and the Danish ... for in these translations, it has not been thought necessary to perpetuate the English errors; nor do I believe it necessary to perpetuate them in our English editions ... the present writer hopes that he will live to see those verbal and grammatical changes authorized." (Defense of the Faith, Vol. 1, pages 300 and 301)
B.H. Roberts.

In Mosiah 21:28 the name of the king has been changed from Benjamin to Mosiah. In the 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon we read as follows:
"... king Benjamin had a gift from God, whereby he could interpret such engravings ..." (Book of Mormon, 1830 edition, page 200)
In modern editions of the Book of Mormon this verse has been changed to read:
"... king Mosiah had a gift from God, whereby he could interpret such engravings ..." (Book of Mormon, 1964 edition, Mosiah 21:2
Why did the Mormon's believe that a perfectly written book had to be changed like this? Because according to it's own words, Benjamin couldn't have been alive at this time, so they changed it to Mosiah.

I could go on. But -- I will say that you can't attack the KJV with the same authority. What to know why? I guess the LDS church will say it better than I can:

"TRANSLATED OUT OF THE ORIGINAL GREEK:AND WITH THE FORMER TRANSLATIONS DILIGENTLY COMPARED AND REVISED, BY HIS MAJESTY’S SPECIAL COMMAND AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES AND CROSS REFERENCES TO THE STANDARD WORKS OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS"

Copied directly from the LDS website. Pretty sterling endorsement...

Here is a pretty good site that is well researched and asks some very important questions. <here>
__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:53 AM
Tedminator's Avatar
Tedminator Tedminator is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,095
usa us florida
Tedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 31,704
Icon11

Quote:
Originally Posted by catzmeow View Post
Bahahahahahahahahahhaha.
ooohgeez, Catz found herself a target rich environment. Neither side is safe now.

Last edited by Tedminator; 03-05-2008 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:54 AM
catzmeow's Avatar
catzmeow catzmeow is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 12,266
usa us florida
catzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 62,618
Send a message via Yahoo to catzmeow
Default

One of the most interesting changes, for me at least, was the change of the phrase "white and delightsome" in the BOM to "pure and delightsome."

It used to be that the book of Mormon discussed the fact quite clearly that dark skin marked those who rebelled in the pre-existence against God. And, conversion and purity could cause people's skin color to change to a lighter hue. This was justification for denying the priesthood to people of dark skin until the 1970s. The book of Mormon was then changed to reflect changing doctrine in 1981.

Here's a great resource on the changes in the BOM. Many are quite substantive, including the one I've highlighted above.

http://www.irr.org/mit/changingscrips.html
__________________
Hedonistic Lemming

Billy Bob: "From now on I don't want to be quoted. EVER! "
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:55 AM
catzmeow's Avatar
catzmeow catzmeow is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 12,266
usa us florida
catzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 62,618
Send a message via Yahoo to catzmeow
Default

I'm guessing, Link, that you are quite young and haven't yet completed a mission. I was married in the LDS temple. And yes, I do consider this thread a target rich environment.

muahahaha.
__________________
Hedonistic Lemming

Billy Bob: "From now on I don't want to be quoted. EVER! "

Last edited by catzmeow; 03-05-2008 at 10:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:58 AM
usgrant7's Avatar
usgrant7 usgrant7 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victor, NY
Age: 46
Posts: 577
usa us new york
usgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to allusgrant7 is a name known to all
Credits: 5,320
Send a message via MSN to usgrant7
Icon9 Point well taken. Thank you for keeping me true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
Be that as it may, that's your opinion. Mormons think differently. If you want to question them about their belief, you have to let them explain it to you in their terms.

Now, I realize you're going way beyond that: trying to prove Mormonism is a fraud and that the Bible and mainstream Christianity is objectively superior. Which is rather rude, IMO, especially because Link did nothing to provoke such an aggressive response. It's rather like an atheist attacking you merely for noting that you're Christian. You'd think that was rude, too.

IMO, you have a lot to learn about tolerating beliefs other than your own.
Honestly, you are right about being rude, and if I offended you or Link, please forgive me. However, pressing an arguement, isn't of itself, rude. If I am rude, please let me know. I don't see how there is a good example of that being done in this discussion.
__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Look who is an NRA member now! ArmedBlog Political Blogs 0 02-14-2008 07:30 AM
Greetings from new member... charlotte Off-Topic Chat 16 11-09-2006 12:57 PM
Hello all! New member here! Jaaaman Off-Topic Chat 13 09-13-2006 05:31 AM
A new member .. palestine Political Opinions & Beliefs 12 06-07-2006 01:55 PM
new member camarade Off-Topic Chat 29 06-18-2004 04:56 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden