Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Of course it can't. Just as it cannot disprove any other ridiculous idea you wish to assert. Let me get you started. It cannot disprove that an invisible dragon lives in my garage. It cannot disprove that a chinese teapot from the Ming dynasty lurks at the heart of the Sun (not yet, at least). It cannot disprove that we are all part of the Matrix. It cannot disprove that pink Unicorns sometimes appear on the Moon. It cannot disprove.....

It can, however, find out how our Universe works, to higher and higher degrees of precision.

And nowhere, is there any indication that a supernatural being exists or has existed.

Originally Posted by Tarheeler

There is also no indication that a supernatural being does not nor ever has existed. When scientists can disprove the existance of God thru scientific therory, you'll have a valid argument. Until then, you're just blowing smoke.

Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Exactly. There is no reason to suspect any such supernatural being exists or ever has existed. So why presume it did/does?

Originally Posted by Herkdriver

You are ignoring his question..

You are ignoring Source.

Science cannot explain Source.

I am intellectually honest enought to admit that God is a Spritual construct outside of the realms of Observation...that there are contradictions in the Old and New Testaments...that my Faith requires

Faith.

You are not being intellectually honest, you are avoiding the question.

You cannot give a Source.

You've proved how a watch works....

You have ignored where it came from...you don't even question it.

and the Religious are idiots?

Sure thing.

Originally Posted by Tarheeler

There is no reason to suspect that this being does not exist. So why presume it does not?

Originally Posted by Herkdriver

Here is your view of Our World...Our Lives.

Stuff Exploded

Stuff Evolved.

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________>

Where'd the Stuff come from?

Was it always here?

if so....

According to many Laws of Physics...
this is Impossible.

Chiefly the 1st Law of Thermodynamics~
Matter cannot be created or destroyed..

According to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics...systems tend towards Entropy and
the Energy within an infinite system woul eventually burn itself out as our Universe is now doing.
It would've burned out long ago if it always existed.

Therefore it was indeed Created....a contradictory statement to the Laws of Physics as we
know them and define them.

Therefore the only "Scientific" conclusion is that Science hits a
BRICK WALL of explanations..

It can't explain the Source of "the Stuff"

Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Because there is no reason to suspect it did. It is a question of probabilities. I can make up an infinite number of things that you or the world of rationality or science cannot show doesn't exist. An infinite number.

Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Does that make it equaly likely that anything I conjur up from my imagination is as likely to exist as to not exist?

Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Suppose I said that giant purple toads sometimes appear in my livingroom. They are at least 500 stories tall and speak to me in Swahili. They transcend time and space and therefore pass through the structures of my living room.

Would you believe me? Would it seem a reasonable assertion that there was at least a 50% probability that they existed?

Originally Posted by Tarheeler

There is also no indication that a supernatural being does not nor ever has existed.

Originally Posted by Tuatara

Yes there is. Where is your supernatural being before 6000 years ago. Science has proven that not only people were around long before that date but the age of the earth itself.

Originally Posted by Tuatara

The same could be said about tooth fairies and unicorns. Science will say there is no evidence of any of these ever existing.
Yet you cannot provide a shred of evidence that there is a God.

Read my signature.

Originally Posted by DanishDynamite

Uh...it is the same thing.

The scientific method lead to the revolutions in knowledge on how our world works, which allowed microwave ovens, DVDs, nuclear power and nuclear missiles, rockets to the Moon, trans-atlantic flights, radio, television, etc, etc, to appear.

And yet, for some odd reason, you feel that when it comes to geology or astronomy, two other branches of science, they somehow aren't scrutinized as well in their theory and prediction making.