Everyone read through these:

1. Matthew 28:1-5 + Matthew 27:52-53

2. Mark 16:1-8

3. Luke 24:1-9

4. John 20:1-12,14

Also, the story about the stone and Joseph of Arimathea:

1. Matthew 27:60

2. Mark 15:46

3. Luke 23:53

4. John 19:39-42

NOW:

1. Matthew 22:30-32

2. Mark 12:24-27

3. Luke 20:34-40

My point is that HYPOTHETICALLY there would be many "Sons of God" or "Children of God" how does that sound? But then look at the stories of the Stone and also the evidence I gave for the Resurrection, look at the conflicting reports. They surely contradict each other. By the way, the Church in Rome had ommited a section of the Gospel of John concerning "resurrection". Why did they do this?

I will give my verdict later after everyone reads through it and then you would see my point that the the Gospels are not reliable to include sections of the "Book of Acts". Because the writer of Luke also wrote ACTS.

VERDICT:

1. Where are the resurrected saints? They are not mentioned,not even implicitly, in the Book of Acts nor in the other 3 books of the Gospels.! Concerning Matthew 27:52-53!

2. One man and one angel is mentioned in both of the gospels of Mark and Matthew. However, the angel in Matthew is said to have moved the stone and sat on it. While in the book of Mark, one man is inside the tomb and the stone is already moved! Two women saw one angel in the Book of Matthew and in the Book of Mark three women saw one man. An earthquake is mentioned in the Book of Matthew only!

3. Two men and two angels are both mentioned in the books of Luke and John. One woman saw two angels at the grave of Jesus in the Book of John. While in the book of Luke three women saw two men.

4. Only one of the Gospels,the Book of John, mentions both Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus as moving the stone to bury Jesus. While the rest only hints of Joseph of Arimathea as moving the stone.

Look also at LUKE 24:9 and MARK 16:8! In the Book of Luke,11 apostles are told of the event while in the Book of Mark the women were afraid of even mentioning the event.

VERDICT: As one of the most important events, "resurrection" of Prophet Jesus, this event is fabricated and weak. Through evidence within the Bible itself despite the OMISSIONS from the Church in Rome, the "resurrection" is not reliable.

...Not to mention the fact that the OT mentions many sons of God who found certain ladies of men to be fair, and romped with them. Jesus as the son of God had a whole race of brothers, as it were.

Of course The Bible (in its plethora of different versions, and you didn't specify WHICH VERSION to look these up in) isn't any more reliable as a divine book than any other holy book. I have yet to be introduced to a religion that doesn't have a political agenda.

__________________
I shall continue to be an impossible person as long as those who are now possible remain possible.
HuffPo's Off The Bus campaign coverage project....Off The Bus Blog