So do I...very undemocratic. Which is one of the reasons I would like to see the UN done away with.

Fortunately, they have no spine anyway. But it's the priciple of it.

__________________
My Political Blog (Updated Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

Well it was probably necessary from post WW2 prospective, but it has no use now. I don't think we should disband the UN, just needs some major reform. We still need some meeting ground where countries can (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) it out.

Personally, I dont think it can be salvaged. Reform would require consent from the members holding veto power, and that seems unlikely.

__________________
My Political Blog (Updated Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

lol..The UN does not define the sovregnity of Serbia but Yugoslavia. There is not one single word mentioned as Serbia or Serbia will be a successor of Yugoslavia. Resolution of 1224 does not mention Serbia or anything regarding to Serbia.

And by the way, the UN secretary general, Ba-Ki Moon's review on Republic of Kosova was rather impressive towards leadership of Republic of Kosova, last week. He praised the leadership and acknowledged the fact that Kosovo now is an independent state, now called as Republic of Kosova(o). Also, the UN maps have changed. The UN no longer uses pre- 2/17 maps.....

Also, Moon praised the effort to amend the new constitution of Republic!



The UN acknowledges that Kosova is an Independent and Sovreign Country!
An anonymous official at UN was quoted: "Kosovo issue is over". I am not sure what Serbia is asking for...".........

__________________
Jesus beat the devil with two sticks. Colossian 2:13,15

Proud American!

Communism/Socialism is similar to legalizing burglary and murder!

Provide a link to Secretary General's reviews and then I will believe you.

Serbia is the legal successor to FRY, and has been acknowledged as such by the UN. Your opinion is worthless.

Yeah, good point. Didn't really consider them using the veto power to keep their veto power. Isn't that a dilly of pickle

.... the 37 nations who you correctly state recognise Kosovo as a sovereign nation just so happen to be allies of the Washington junta. Erm, coincidence ... NOT.

The idea that the Iraqi 'government' is NOT being propped up and supported by the gangsters in the Whitehouse is so ludicrous as to be offensive to the Iraqi resistance. Maliki is a US stooge and the Iraqi 'government' like all 'governments' under occupation have no democratic legitimacy whatsoever. You see all of us with eyes and ears who are not brainwashed by US propaganda can see this reality for what it is.

The entire history of US imperialism post WW2 is full of examples of where the US government has actively supported, either overtly or covertly, regimes that are sympathetic to its geo-political strategic objectives. If the government's concerned happen not to be 'democratic' than no matter. Its called "divide and rule" my friend (my enemies enemy is my friend). Its an integral aspect of imperialism. The British used the same tactics themselves up to 1945 throughout their various colonies. Wake up and smell the coffee.

You say that as if it should matter.

They are not economically relevant. They are not military relevant. So why should we care whether or not they recognize Kosovo?

Taiwan has no UN recognition. Yet they still have their own military, economy, and political system.



Since the Iraqi "resistance" is opposed to democracy, I don't see why offending them is a bad thing.

The most generous numbers I have seen show that they make up a mere 5% of the population....and if you just count the fighters, its actually much lower than that.



They only have legitimacy when they agree with you huh?



Irrelevant even if true. Democracy contributes to our own long term security. They don't have to lose in order for us to win.



I always ask this and you people never answer:

How do you determine what the people want if they are not allowed to speak freely?

Are you saying we should just take your word for it that they dont like democracy, and don't want to make their own decisions?

You whine about US imperialism, and in the very next sentence you say that oppressive regimes have a right to oppress their people. You don't think thats a bit hypocritical?



So was Saddam our friend? Where is he now?



Take some of your own advice.

__________________
My Political Blog (Updated Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

Not yet. But the US is weary close. It is still behind the ROMA.But is caching up.
Son you will the most powerful nation that ever existed. But do the super fast rising as the "the most powerful nation that ever existed “the downfall will be even faster.
The US society is becoming more and more violent, and sodomic degenerate. Like ROMA was. And when the sodomic-sadistic-violent reach the hight,the US will collapse catastrophically. The moral values are already at minimum in the US and unfortunately in the world.Let not forget that when US began rise as world power(after ww2) it was build on the Nazis that fled to US. From scientists to military and politic officials. Also the Jews gold that the Nazis robed that rocket you to world power.

Let me remind you the all the empires thought them selves to be invincible .That they can never make mistakes that the previous empire has made. But that was not true.Yust study the history.

Why?

The US touches every corner of the world. We've been to the moon. We have the highest GDP of any nation that has ever existed. We have the most powerful military of any nation that has ever existed.

Rome never did any of that.


Not necessarily....there is a first time for everything.


How long would it take for the US to be in power to prove you wrong?


They were not us.



According to history, no one could travel to the moon. And then someone did. There's a first time for everything.

__________________
My Political Blog (Updated Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?