![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
KLA waits until Yugoslavia is on thin ice after the Bosnia stuff (having been specifically told not to try anything like that in Kosovo). KLA does some nasty stuff Milsovic does the political equivalent of jumping up and down on the thin ice. Yugoslavia goes in the drink. Even the Albanian haters are probably upset with him about that. So it sounds like it's known in Serbia that you're attempting to buy Russia's friendship for a few billion dollars. Personally I have my doubts that will work out so well for you. Your best bet at getting Kosovo back is to have a great economy. Because friendly as they are I don't think Russia will help you invade. So the economic lose will only hurt your chances of reclaiming Kosovo. Where it would help you is if you were worried about losing another province. Are you? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Concerning gas pipeline: Russia has gas of LOWEST quality, second, we have already been totally addicted of their gas (large percent of gas in Serbia is from Russia, however - a curiosity - province of Vojvodina exploits enough gas to satisfy it's own needs). I am a pragmatic person, and I don't believe in Russian "friendship" but I believe in Russian interests. I think that their maximum of denial will be reached when this agreement is arranged and when we don't have what else to sell. For instant, lets see China: they're neutral or somewhat approving Serbia's positions since Serbian government agreed (this is not so well known information) to discharge certification and standards check of Chinese products at customs. This is a reliable fact, my source is a Serbian international trader who was VERY surprised with new trading regime. However, this means a flood of cheap, low quality equipment from China. Anyway, I think that way of thinking as a populist politician, and not as a statesman is characteristic for current Serbian scene. There is a slight difference between statesman and politician... such as between a fisherman and man standing on shore, acting as idiot. Quote:
What about parties in parliament that support concept of decentralization, euro-regionalism etc.? They are minorities in opposition, however they're opposition and it is very wrong to generalize this way. Second, that party (Serbian Radical Party) got 44% on second round in presidential elections. Real strength of a single party is determined in first round, when they got 39%, with (roughly) 1,6 mil votes. And that is the single strongest party in Serbia. Just to remind, that's how much Albanians with the right of vote Kosovo has now, according to statistics. If Albanians in Serbia are powerful as a single most powerful party, and they don't use that right, what do they exactly want? To be honest, in case that Albanians from Kosovo wish to stay within Serbia, that means practically that in every presidential elections Kosovo Albanians will have 100% guaranteed candidate in 2nd round. That also means that they can make one of 3 single strongest parties in Serbia, beside Democratic Party and Serbian Radical Party! You still haven't responded on my comments about what do you get except ethnically clean state - and I won't argue about how it's made - that you couldn't legally have in Serbia if you would use your legal rights?! Practically, Serbian government during negotiations offered almost total independence and only to have our flag on your borders and institutions and you have denied even that? What's that for? I think that there is just one possible explanation: pure national hate... Before you say that I'm maybe a member of conservative, hard right wing or something I will just mention that I support liberal democratic party. If you don't know who they are, I guess that your ultimate reliable source (wikipedia) will do the job |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Here is the most recent one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal...Serbia_2005%29 Quote:
Check this out (this is the entry on their leader, whose name I cant pronounce): Quote:
This should serve as a reminder that while wikipedia is generally correct, it is NOT infallible. Last edited by Sadistic-Savior; 04-04-2008 at 01:53 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
See, LDP is the only party that is PRO Kosovo independence. I have some friends in very high positions within Jovanovic's coalition (one of the vice-presidents of Demo-christian party) and he told me that some Albanian structures gave a lot of money to finance Cedomir Jovanovic's stance considering Kosovo. Since I am a supporter of the Democratic party, and since we will probably make a coalition after the May elections, I have to notice that LDP will have to change its policy considering Kosovo, or at least be silent. LDP represents the 5% (roughly) of Serbian population that feels fine about cutting off our territory. The other 95% is strongly opposed. Considering the GAZPROM deal, I'm happy with it, no matter the money we lost. At least we have ONE ally, and will get the chance to play between the East and the West once more. That is the type of policy that proved to be useful for our country in the past. And the East is becoming more powerful every day. I am pro-western orientated, I want to see Serbia within EU, but having Russia as a joker can't be bad for us.
__________________
Albanians are Islamo-fascists supported by Bin Laden and trained in Al-Qaeda terrorist camps. Albanians were (chronologically): Turkish horse breeders, Hitler's little pawns, Stalin's servants and today they are Uncle Sam's "allies". Albanians from Kosovo ethnically cleansed more than 250,000 non-Albanians: Serbs, Jews, Gypsies and others; desecrated more than 150 Christian churches and monasteries and killed thousands in cold blood. Last edited by AmusedToDeath; 04-04-2008 at 01:58 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
In Serbian language, there is a difference between term of "party" - there are two terms, to be more precise "stranka" and "partija". In this wiki case on English there is a problem because I think there is no other term for political party than party. The one made in 1989. is made by Serbian conservative royalists, and the second one is made by Serbian republicans which strongly support concept of Serbian citizenship, not national state. This in wiki is also true: this oppositional leader (he is within a parliamentary party) somewhat supports Kosovo's independence. People for the most time mark him as someone who is suspicious for his source of money, and there are claims that he is maybe financed by Albanians, but I STRONGLY doubt that. I am also sure that there are parties on Kosovo that are suggesting that it would be wise to stay with Serbia, no? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I dont think they are close to a majority in either case. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | ||||||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Italy probe unearths huge Iraq arms deal" | Metrophobe | Current Events | 1 | 08-12-2007 11:54 AM |
| The Reason Dems went for "the deal" | JP5 | Current Events | 5 | 05-24-2005 07:43 PM |
| "Anti-Russian sentiment runs very strong in Finland" | SporkLord | Current Events | 11 | 10-13-2004 06:34 AM |
| Russian Jet Sent "Hijack" Alert | PoliticalForum | Current Events | 25 | 08-28-2004 05:32 PM |
| A Deal Reached on "Some" Judges | JP5 | Current Events | 8 | 05-20-2004 12:34 AM |