The US is wrong for intervening. We have no right to be there and need to withdraw from the region. You guys (meaning all ethnic groups in the region) need to fight it out until you can redraw some permanent borders and are able to subjugate everyone within those borders. Then, and only then, will stability be brought about.

I disagree once again. These conflicts are not to be resolved using force. But they shouldn't be fired up from the outside, as it always happened before.

Every ethnic group in the region of Balkans, and every other place on the planet, has the right to exist and nobody can take them that right away. But when certain disagreements occur, they should be resolved by talks. Other nations can provide "good services" and mediation, but not weapons and stuff like that. However, if one group or a national minority within a sovereign country starts using weapons as a tool in "discussion" and starts committing acts of terrorism - then such group of people are to be dealt with accordingly.

My point is this: I don't approve Milosevic's type of "negotiation" and I am very aware of his catastrophic policy, not only toward Albanians, but toward Serbs as well.

On the other hand, I disapprove even more with Uncle Sam's "humanitarian intervention" that brought death upon 2000 innocent civilians and a $50 bl damage to infrastructure of Serbia. That is a crime beyond crimes.

Dealt with how?

By force. No negotiation with terrorists.

I don't believe in any form of US interventionism.

Who will be dealing that force?

Good. Then we agree on something.

Yeah. So?

You say that as if it is a bad thing.

__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

The organs of power: the police or the army, depending on size of terrorist threat.