
Originally Posted by
oldjar07
Cold fusion isn't impossible like many believe it to be, and it doesn't break current laws of physics. If extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, prove cold fusion isn't possible. Cold fusion has been replicated in peer review 3,000 times. Most of these were by prominent institutions. Every one of those was wrong? What is the point in peer review if it could be wrong that many times? How many other things passing through peer review have been wrong? It looks like some kind of effect is occurring that produces excess heat. And what we know about chemical reactions doesn't apply to this excess heat. Don't you think we should look into it more even if it already hasn't been proven to work?
Cold Fusion doesn't mean you get more energy then you put into the system. Also Cold Fusion is a fact of nature, fusion doesn't occur in the sun yet cold fusion does through quantum tunneling. IF this device is indeed producing "cold fusion" the most probable cause is a statistical tunneling effect that probably has a limit. This limit probably will only allow for a relatively low efficiency.
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.” - Max Plank
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.” - Max Plank
Bookmarks