Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Cold fusion home reactor

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldjar07 View Post
    Cold fusion isn't impossible like many believe it to be, and it doesn't break current laws of physics. If extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, prove cold fusion isn't possible. Cold fusion has been replicated in peer review 3,000 times. Most of these were by prominent institutions. Every one of those was wrong? What is the point in peer review if it could be wrong that many times? How many other things passing through peer review have been wrong? It looks like some kind of effect is occurring that produces excess heat. And what we know about chemical reactions doesn't apply to this excess heat. Don't you think we should look into it more even if it already hasn't been proven to work?
    Cold Fusion doesn't mean you get more energy then you put into the system. Also Cold Fusion is a fact of nature, fusion doesn't occur in the sun yet cold fusion does through quantum tunneling. IF this device is indeed producing "cold fusion" the most probable cause is a statistical tunneling effect that probably has a limit. This limit probably will only allow for a relatively low efficiency.
    “All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.” - Max Plank

    “Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.” - Max Plank


  2. Default

    One of the distinguishing features of ColdFusion is its associated scripting language, ColdFusion Markup Language. CF-ML compares to the scripting components of ASP, JSP, and PHP in purpose and features, but its tag syntax more closely resembles HTML, while its script syntax resembles JavaScript. "ColdFusion" is often used synonymously with "CFML" or "CFM", but there are additional CFML application servers besides ColdFusion, and ColdFusion supports programming languages other than CFML, such as server-side Action script and embedded scripts that can be written in a JavaScript-like language known as Cf Script.

    Originally a product of Allaire and released in July 1995, ColdFusion was developed by Jeremy Allaire. In 2001 Allaire was acquired by Macromedia, who in turn were acquired by Adobe Systems Inc in 2005.

    ColdFusion is most often used for data-driven websites or intranets, but can also be used to generate remote services such as SOAP web services or Flash remoting. It is especially well-suited as the server-side technology to the client-side.




    find duplicate images
    software download
    iTunes converter

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldjar07 View Post
    Just because you can't read<snip>
    Did not read any further. If you want to make such an abusive comment because do not expect a reasonable response.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonsa View Post
    Seems to me that if research of cold fusion obtained ANY replicable peer review results there would a "fusion rush" in the science, military and financial communities the likes of which we have never seen.

    A safe, clean, unlimited source of energy that does not require any special fuel. Energy resources are the foundation of civilization. A Mr Fusion home reactor would be so transformative that we wouldn't recognize the world it would build - technologically, socially, politically or economically.
    Well said. I cannot think of what else needs to be said.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anarcho-Technocrat View Post
    Cold Fusion doesn't mean you get more energy then you put into the system. Also Cold Fusion is a fact of nature, fusion doesn't occur in the sun yet cold fusion does through quantum tunneling. IF this device is indeed producing "cold fusion" the most probable cause is a statistical tunneling effect that probably has a limit. This limit probably will only allow for a relatively low efficiency.
    Isn't that the same with hot fusion? We've never gotten more energy out than we have put in with hot fusion either.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robot View Post
    Did not read any further. If you want to make such an abusive comment because do not expect a reasonable response.
    I've presented the evidence, and you refused to look at it. Cold fusion is possible.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonsa View Post
    Seems to me that if research of cold fusion obtained ANY replicable peer review results there would a "fusion rush" in the science, military and financial communities the likes of which we have never seen.

    A safe, clean, unlimited source of energy that does not require any special fuel. Energy resources are the foundation of civilization. A Mr Fusion home reactor would be so transformative that we wouldn't recognize the world it would build - technologically, socially, politically or economically.
    A lot of things don't make sense. There was a rush to begin with, but the reaction was hard to replicate. The first transistors were hard to replicate as well. A lot of institutions couldn't replicate it, so they claimed cold fusion is impossible. It has been an uphill battle ever since. The replication rate now is a lot higher than it was back then.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldjar07 View Post
    I've presented the evidence, and you refused to look at it. Cold fusion is possible.
    Wrong. I looked at it, found it to be pathetic. I even told you why. None published in reputable journals. What they are are mostly nothing more than papers at conferences and meetings. Not even peer reviewed. Others are nothing to do with cold fusion.

    Sorry you have not provided any evidence of cold fusion. Not interested in if it is in theory possible. Just has it been done? Answer - No. If there was evidence then there would be a huge rush to duplicate and build on the results.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robot View Post
    Wrong. I looked at it, found it to be pathetic. I even told you why. None published in reputable journals. What they are are mostly nothing more than papers at conferences and meetings. Not even peer reviewed. Others are nothing to do with cold fusion.

    Sorry you have not provided any evidence of cold fusion. Not interested in if it is in theory possible. Just has it been done? Answer - No. If there was evidence then there would be a huge rush to duplicate and build on the results.
    Many were peer reviewed in the journal of electroanalytical chemistry. They have different names than cold fusion, but they are all describing similar effects. One is Low energy nuclear reactions. If they say something about nickel, copper, helium production, hydrogen, deuterium, anomalous heat production, surface plasmitons, or palladium, it probably deals with cold fusion. Like I said, there was a huge rush to duplicate the results, but it proved hard to replicate. The replication rate is much higher now.

  10. #30

    Default

    I'd rather get a time machine. Then I could just get the F*** outta here. Go back to that 'simpler place and time'.
    'WELCOME TO CALIFORNIA' WHERE 'VIRTUAL' REALITY IS A WAY OF LIFE'

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. LFTR - What Fusion Wanted to Be
    By Blasphemer in forum Science
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Nov 26 2011, 04:20 AM
  2. Cold Fusion demonstration
    By oldjar07 in forum Science
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: Nov 01 2011, 01:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks