Why do you tell lies like this?
So far all negative effects of the fantasized global warming Agwists could come up are tropical diseases.
So far only tropical disease Agwists could come up is Norwegian scabies.
The appeal to pity works in this way:
First faked pictures of Chernobyl children are posted, than the conclusion that Nuclear power plantare bad is coming.
First pics of scabies are posted then conclusion about fantasized global warming and its negative effects are made.
So what you said sarcastically is also all truth.
RPA1 had already debunked it:
“Looks gross...but I don't see what it has to do with global warming. Looks like its mostly a hygiene problem. Perhaps you Aussies ought to take more showers, wash your linens or something.”
It is also sarcasm and true. Indeed scabies is not a tropical decease. It is a scare only for OWS protesters, Aussies and other warmists who ignore hygiene and have sex with animals or with whatever comes across. It is not an effect of warming, but it is effect of life style, lack of basic hygiene of soul and body the scientific majorities are forcing on us.
Florida the US is tropical and subtropical, It is a resort, a place of vacation and retirement, of gross harvests of food with little efforts. So far Obama supporters have a difficult time to change it to fit their life style. No tropical diseases so far.
At the same time at the North one can hear about flue shuts in winter, and cold bringing cold deceases, I am not even talking about freezing to death and no food under the snow. Even birds migrate to tropics and subtropics from our places. Once in a while I escape to FL, too.
It is warmists who lie
all the time
and try to bully others and play ""gotchya" game.
What part of "just one" do people not understand?
If you confirm that you have no objection to my post I may choose to take time and demonstrate in an easy and simple way that your fresh lie is another lie and stinks in the same way as scabies.
If you have an objection to statements of my post you quoted I am giving you another chance to make it.
Analysis of trends and of aggregated time series on climatic (30-year) scale does not indicate consistent trends worldwide. Despite common perception, in general, the detected trends are more negative (less intense floods in most recent years) than positive. Similarly, Svensson et al. (2005) and Di Baldassarre et al. (2010) did not find systematical change neither in flood increasing or decreasing numbers nor change in flood magnitudes in their analysis.