Thread: Positive effects of Global Warming?

Originally Posted by Poor Debater

16±4xPAL @ 440 Ma. In other words, likely Silurian, and if Ordovician, nonspecifically Ashgillian.

Meanwhile, back to my own question 1:

Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation?

YES or NO?

1.

point where Gaar claims anything about Ma and PAL and or 16±4xPAL?

2. point me back where you were asking your question 1, so I'd try to understand how did happen that I did not answer it.

Originally Posted by _Inquisitor_

1. point where Gaar claims anything about Ma and PAL and or 16±4xPAL?

Point me to the place where I claimed he did.

Originally Posted by _Inquisitor_

2. point me back where you were asking your question 1, so I'd try to understand how did happen that I did not answer it.

I asked the question here:
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060931174

And you claimed the answer was yes, here:
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060934124

But then you refused to back up your answer,
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060936839
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937258
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937631
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937751
and here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060938067

I specified my exact criteria here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060938438

which you failed to meet here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060941170

Does that refresh your memory?

Now back to the original question, which you still have not answered:

Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation?

YES or NO?

Originally Posted by Poor Debater

1. Point me to the place where I claimed he did.



2. I asked the question here:
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060931174

And you claimed the answer was yes, here:
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060934124

But then you refused to back up your answer,
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060936839
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937258
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937631
here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060937751
and here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060938067

I specified my exact criteria here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060938438

which you failed to meet here
http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060941170

Does that refresh your memory?

Now back to the original question, which you still have not answered:

Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation?

YES or NO?

1. I'll take you word that you did not. Just confirm that you did not and are not doing.


2. Please show me one just one place where you asked your question 1, so I could see why I did not type 2 letters to answer it. It is also will be easy for a reader to see. Neither the reader nor I will read all long posts to find your question 1. Just quote it and post one link.

lol, how dishonest can you get.....All inquisitor does is ask silly questions and finally when he is asked something pertinent he deflects by asking more nonsensical and irrelevant questions. Can you say owned?

Originally Posted by The Lepper

lol, how dishonest can you get.....All inquisitor does is ask silly questions and finally when he is asked something pertinent he deflects by asking more nonsensical and irrelevant questions.

Bolded red are some insults

Originally Posted by The Lepper

Can you say owned?

Yes, I can.

If you don't mind not asking questions which have no relation to the subject and have an easy answer.

I am not asking to stop insults, just if you can try to insert answers to my points and questions before, after or between insults.


Reposting:

1. I'll take you word that you did not. Just confirm that you did not and are not doing.


2. Please show me one just one place where you asked your question 1, so I could see why I did not type 2 letters to answer it. It is also will be easy for a reader to see. Neither the reader nor I will read all long posts to find your question 1. Just quote it and post one link.

Rest removed to prevent inquisitor from dragging another thread into an inane, off-topic argument.

2. Please show me one just one place where you asked your question 1, so I could see why I did not type 2 letters to answer it. It is also will be easy for a reader to see. Neither the reader nor I will read all long posts to find your question 1. Just quote it and post one link.

Huh? PD just answered that. I'm not trying to be insulting, but you don't seem capable of basic reading comprehension. I seriously suggest brushing up on this before trying to engage people in discussion as it will only lead to further confusion and embarrassment for you if you persist.

I appologize to PD for taking Lepper for him.


I did not mean to feed a troll. Beaten everywhere else he came just to flamebite and insult.

PD may join Lepper, that will be typical and will prove my point I will requote.

DP may silence away and thus delegate his voice to Lepper.

But so far I cannot say he has done that. I'll wait.

So are you going to stop deflecting and answer the question?

Originally Posted by _Inquisitor_

2. Please show me one just one place where you asked your question 1, so I could see why I did not type 2 letters to answer it. It is also will be easy for a reader to see. Neither the reader nor I will read all long posts to find your question 1. Just quote it and post one link.

I asked it the first time here:
"In fact, since the Hirnantian glaciation lasted less than a million years, do you have any reference at all for paleo-CO2 levels that hits that tiny window?"

I asked the second time here:
"Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation? YES or NO?"

I asked the third time here.

In this post, you said:
"if I don't [post such a reference] I will not only accept that I've lost but I will also accept and appollogize for bluffing, bullying and etc."

We're still waiting for your apology for bluffing and bullying.

Originally Posted by Poor Debater

I asked it the first time here:
"In fact, since the Hirnantian glaciation lasted less than a million years, do you have any reference at all for paleo-CO2 levels that hits that tiny window?"

I asked the second time here:
"Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation? YES or NO?"

I asked the third time here.

In this post, you said:
"if I don't [post such a reference] I will not only accept that I've lost but I will also accept and appollogize for bluffing, bullying and etc."

.

I have been asking quote the question 1 and post one link to it.

Not 2, not 3 not 10 but just one link to the post where you asked your question 1.

Should I remind it to you?

Originally Posted by Originally posted by Poor Debater

Meanwhile, back to my own question 1:

Do you have any peer-reviewed original proxy data that shows high CO2 concentrations specifically during the late Ordovician glaciation?

http://www.politicalforum.com/scienc...post1060962827

This is what you called your question 1 asking it the 1st time.

I galnced through your 1st link and did not find this question. It is not there. You had never posted it when you stated – “back to my own question 1”

One cannot get back to something which never existed.

One does not need to look back to see that you had never posted question 1 when you stated “back to my question.”
One can see that you cannot post a link to any post back before you asked this question the 1st time.

You cannot.

You and Lepper nave been trying to deceive the honest public saying “ back to my own question 1.”

All you and all other warmists have been doing is lying, perverting and deceiving the honest public.


Either quote your question 1 and post one link ( just one link will be enough to it ) or accept that you had never asked question 1. when you stated “back to my own question 1“ and apologize.