Thread: runaway greenhouse effect?

Originally Posted by cassandrabandra

do you have a literacy problem?

he is saying that WHAT HE SAID HAS BEEN MISREPORTED.

and I would add misreported by ignorant denialists.

Yet he gives no specifics and needs weeks to spin it to get the approval of his government employers

Originally Posted by gmb92

So some trash tabloid completely distorts his work and it's somehow his fault? Are you for real? Show a little skepticism of Daily Mail, skeptics.

Yet Sinclair is not a hack and propagandists? nice try

Originally Posted by ptif219

Yet he gives no specifics

How more specific do you want?

Zunli Lu:
“It is unfortunate that my research, “An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula,” recently published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, has been misrepresented by a number of media outlets.

Several of these media articles assert that our study claims the entire Earth heated up during medieval times without human CO2 emissions. We clearly state in our paper that we studied one site at the Antarctic Peninsula. The results should not be extrapolated to make assumptions about climate conditions across the entire globe. Other statements, such as the study “throws doubt on orthodoxies around global warming,” completely misrepresent our conclusions. Our study does not question the well-established anthropogenic warming trend.”
http://asnews.syr.edu/newsevents_201...STATEMENT.html

Originally Posted by ptif219

...and needs weeks to spin it to get the approval of his government employers

or perhaps The Daily Mail is not really near the top of a New York academics reading list.

Originally Posted by ptif219

Yet Sinclair is not a hack and propagandists? nice try

WTF is Sinclair?

You were asked why you think it is the academics fault when some trashy tabloid completely distorts his work?

Why can't you answer?

Originally Posted by ptif219

Yet he gives no specifics and needs weeks to spin it to get the approval of his government employers

so you agreed with him when you thought that what he said supported your argument because he was misreported, but now that he is wanting to set the record straight - then he's the liar?

Originally Posted by bugalugs

How more specific do you want?

Zunli Lu:
“It is unfortunate that my research, “An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula,” recently published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, has been misrepresented by a number of media outlets.

Several of these media articles assert that our study claims the entire Earth heated up during medieval times without human CO2 emissions. We clearly state in our paper that we studied one site at the Antarctic Peninsula. The results should not be extrapolated to make assumptions about climate conditions across the entire globe. Other statements, such as the study “throws doubt on orthodoxies around global warming,” completely misrepresent our conclusions. Our study does not question the well-established anthropogenic warming trend.”
http://asnews.syr.edu/newsevents_201...STATEMENT.html


or perhaps The Daily Mail is not really near the top of a New York academics reading list.

They showed warming and now say it should not be used? Seems to me their bosses do not like the information.

The information is being shown that is not misrepresenting any thing

Originally Posted by bugalugs

WTF is Sinclair?

You were asked why you think it is the academics fault when some trashy tabloid completely distorts his work?

Why can't you answer?

Sinclair is the owner of a GW propaganda blog that claims the scientists deny it. Where is the scientist speaking this in a news source?

Originally Posted by cassandrabandra

so you agreed with him when you thought that what he said supported your argument because he was misreported, but now that he is wanting to set the record straight - then he's the liar?

They reported what his report said how is that misreported?

Originally Posted by ptif219

Sinclair is the owner of a GW propaganda blog that claims the scientists deny it. Where is the scientist speaking this in a news source?

You have been shown several times the scientists own statement posted on his University'e website

The last time you were show was a few posts up. You even quoted it.
runaway greenhouse effect?
How long do you want to pretend that this information came just from a blog?

Originally Posted by ptif219

They reported what his report said how is that misreported?

again ... I have to ask - do you have a literacy problem?

if so, pm me and I will provide you some online links to assist you.