![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Under the current U.S. political climate, are you in favor of re-implementing the United States Draf | |||
| Yes |
|
39 | 29.10% |
| No |
|
95 | 70.90% |
| Voters: 134. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
There is no forseeable need for a draft, and if such a need would arise they would insitute it without any public opinion polls. So, your in the army now!
Conscription on the other hand...that you would not want. Wasting 8 (or more) perfectly good months of your life, oh I hate conscription. |
|
|||
|
Not for this BS war, however if they had declared the need for a draft prior to invading Iraq maybe some of the voters would have reconsidered the need to invade when their own sons could have been called on.
|
|
|||
|
..you can almost guarantee one...there are rumours that one is planned for the draft to begin in early-mid 2005....
__________________
The last time this country mixed politics with religion, people got burned at the stake. |
|
||||
|
Here are some links/info. I have to admit that the way the articles are presented are kind of weird -- especially how they link back to SSS. I am really, REALLY ***REEEEEAAAALLLLLYYYY*** not trying to start a debate on whether or not it will happen, because either it will, or it won't.
I am only trying to do two thing: Get a feel for how people feel. Find out if there is more information. Thx. http://www.vancouver.indymedia.org/n.../01/105146.php (Note... this link has other links that are good) |
|
|||
|
In Finland the measure has to passed by parliament, and approved by the president, but then again all Finnish males from 18-65 are considered reserves so...
So what PJO34 said for the states sounds about right. But I see no reason to call for a draft in the forseeable future, unless a WWIII seems to be lurking behind the corner. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | ||||||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|