Quote:
Originally Posted by kronikcope
Alright this kinda pisses me off. This guy in my opinion is generalizing Blackwater on a few incidents in Iraq. Without a doubt, Blackwater soldiers are the best Pay for Play soldiers in the world.
And the fact of the matter is simple, unless you pay us well and give us legal loops, we're not going to set one foot in Iraq. People don't do this (*)(*)(*)(*) b/c its fun.
|
The soldiers themselves knew and understood the military code of conduct that they were operating under. Blaming a private organization for knowingly violating the rules of the commitment you've made is simply absurd. You don't do that. If wrong-doing is occurrring, you report it, and take whatever steps necessary to be a person of conscience.
I know a few Blackwater employees. They all served multiple stints in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, and most served for 10+ years in direct combat roles in the Marines or the Army. They're all top-caliber. Blackwater is primarily in the people protection business right now. They are assigned to protect the safety of U.S. non-military personnel and Iraqi political leaders. The fact of the matter is that there are any number of state department and other non-military personnel in Iraq working hard to help establish systems to support self-governance. The military CANNOT do this job, and civilians are required to guide this process. BW employees protect their safety and ensure that they can do the jobs that are needed to support the peace. Attacks have been targeted specifically at Iraqi politicians and others who are trying to create administrative and government systems for the people of Iraq. These attacks are targeted by those who would like to see the Iraqi government fail, and the nation descend into chaos. These people do not want a democracy to emerge from their country, they want a THEOCRACY that would curtail the liberties of their religious rivals.
We simply do not have enough military personnel to fill all combat roles and protection details. And, these protection details require highly trained personnel who, if they were still active duty military, would be required in other areas. Any service member can only be assigned to a combat role for so many years of their service. And, after 10+ years, they have a right to leave military service if they so choose. Why should their expertise, however, be lost to us as a country? We need their skills, and we should be willing to pay for them.
You cannot have a transition to peace in Iraq while not protecting the American (and other UN agency) civilians and elected Iraqi officials.
And the fact remains that these democratically elected iraqi leaders are serving at significant risk to their own lives and those of their families. The more support they have to pursue their goals, the sooner we can get all of our people out.
Say what you want about BW, they do the job they're paid to do, at tremendous risk to their personnel, and they do it well...better than anyone else could do it at this point in time. How many of their protected people has BW lost, so far?