UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Dec 1, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

?

Who altered this footage?

  1. Manos Megagiannis

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. A TV network like CNN

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. A law enforcement agency

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Test your fantasy. Find a boeing with the right engine close to the fuselage and the left at the normal distance from it, not from 911, but real. Get to work, trying to prove your fantasy.:worker: You don't what you're talking about, trying to say what they would've done.:blahblah:
     
  2. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look up perspective in the dictionary. Educate yourself. It will do you a world of good.
     
  3. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Because it could not get in between the towers to leave its own shadow the way the drone did, because it was flying was too fast, 500 mph. It's not possible, but it happened on 911 during fake plane broadcasts from all angles.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong yet again. There are no videos of the planes or anything else circling the towers other than some helicopters. You lose. Again. :lol: Just making claims and hoping nobody notices your claims are (*)(*)(*)(*) doesn't make them true even when you wish REALLY REALLY hard and pray to Alex Jones!
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You're asking me to do something instead of demonstrating how I'm wrong. You lost because you failed to do anything but claim perspective changes what, the engines?LOL It doesn't make a difference how it's photographed, neither engine will appear to be closer to the fuselage than the other. You are stuck in fantasy because some 911 fiction is being exposed here.
     
  6. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :lol: Someone failed to look up perspective. Figures.
     
  7. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You are a liar.:blahblah: Every fake plane from the right on the north view would have circled the towers. The drone did circle the towers and there's a south view of a fake plane circling, which all leads to the correct conclusion that something circled, not a plane.
     
  8. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You failed to advance your failure as a liar. That's good, because you can't find evidence that doesn't exist.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You've got no call saying anyone else is a liar with your BS 'orbs' and 'fake planes'


    I'd suggest you get WAY better evidence first
     
  10. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    At least I can respond. Investigators don't pick their evidence, nor do they ignore their best. A ball coming from west was not a plane or chopper and that ignored fact is the best evidence for NY.
     
  11. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My failure as a liar? Let's see. If one fails at lying, they are telling the truth. You finally got something right even as you're trying to lie. TFF!!!!
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can respond with lies and crappy videos and blurry thumbnails that you 'claim' shows things that aren't true
     
  13. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    7forever, you posted this image and asserted that the wing "is attached to air" Explain what you mean.

    Clearly we are looking at the underside of the aircraft in this image. The left and right wings are both attached to the fuselage in this image.

    Are you seeing a different image?
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You haven't really failed as a liar because you haven't tried to prove the plane myth, only accepted it was true. You are completely incapable of supporting the plane myth because no real evidence exists. You have black images with no windows. That means, no evidence of planes is available for debate.:nana:
     
  15. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's called a double standard. You would use blurry and fake pics of planes to prove there were real planes. Well, you wouldn't really post them because they aren't real.:shh:
     
  16. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    With your lie being posted, explain to us how you'd convince a jury that a real plane with dots for engines, and no wings could cast its own shadow in between the rear of tower 1 and west side of tower 2? How could any plane traveling 500 mph circle the towers before crashing into the rear of the building southeast of Tower 1?:bounce:

    [​IMG]
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlD1j-XqxmE&feature=related"]WPIX (WB11) 9/11 9:31 - 9:41 - YouTube[/ame]
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A poor resolution does not mean it was not a plane. Why does that building you claim is the WTC not have any windows?
     
  18. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All I see is the shadow from the debris ejected from the building. You can clearly see the explosion propagating from the front of the building before any shadow is seen. Pretty lame, 7.
     
  19. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not a shadow. That's the aircraft. In the animated GIF you posted there is clearly a space between the north and south towers. The aircraft did not pass through this space, it passed behind it.

    also:

    7forever, you posted an image of an aircraft and asserted that the wing "is attached to air" Explain what you mean.
     
  20. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That's the shadow of the drone. That's not an aircraft because it doesn't have wings. In the animated GIF I posted there is clearly a space between the north and south towers. The aircraft did not pass through this space, but the drone did.

    Fanbeer, has made a decision on how the shadow was visible from the north view because it can't mean what it really means because it destroys the official myth of planes.:blahblah: Fake 175 has been obliterated by my simple observations of video and witnesses who prove the existence of a ball shaped drone. Fake 175 was entirely behind the south tower in its final 7 seconds, therefore could not have left any visible shadow viewable from the north..:sunnysideup:

    [​IMG]
     
  21. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    A clear shadow with no visible windows. The shadow was strong. The truth will take that any day.
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It does not look like it has wings because of the poor resolution of the gif, which is the exact same reason the buildings do not appear to have windows.
     
  23. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It doesn't look like it has wings because it didn't, because it's fake. Also, they apparently aired the drone just before this cgi only minutes after doing it the first time. 9:33-34.:shh:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Poor resolution video, not 'drones'.
     
  25. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What shadow are you talking about? The gif you posted was taken from the north, from a position that allowed for a space between the two towers. The aircraft approached from the south. This means the towers were between the camera and the aircraft. Therefore what you see behind the space between the towers is the aircraft as it approaches the south tower. It is not a shadow, it is the aircraft.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Clearly the aircraft can be seen behind the towers to the south if viewed through the space between the towers from the north.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page