apparently you do not grasp what prima facia means and how completely in error it often is. due process requires discovery upon rebuttal, the american people have been (*)(*)(*)(*)ed again.
yeh actually they do. in those days you couldnt just drop a kid in texas and claim it wa s american LOL
based on your logic they could have put in osama bin laden and that would satisfy your expectations and interpretations of fact.
You say the words and cite cases that aren't applicable.. don't understand the legal definitions and won't read the law, Koko.....
If Osama Bin Ladin showed a genuine American Birth Certificate, confirmed by the State of Hawaii, and proved that he has been a resident of the United States for 14 years, and was 35 years of age or older and convinced the majority of American people to vote for him, and the Electoral College to elect him, and convinced Congress he was legally eligible to be confirmed as President- then yes, I think Osama bin Ladin would be our legally elected President. After all, we had less than that when we elected Richard Nixon, and we still survived.
"prima facia" is not a word or phrase. If you mean "prima facie," I certainly do know what it means. It means the case is established unless the other side produces rebuttal evidence. Not only did the birther idiots not provide any rebuttal evidence, they also provided the prima facie evidence.
State warned Obama fails ballot requirements 'Both of candidates' parents must be U.S. citizens at time of candidate's birth' Published: 11 hours ago by Bob Unruh http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/128467/ It only takes one domino to trigger the chain reaction. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F42T44MxRpA&feature=player_embedded"]Very Cool Domino Rally Set Up - YouTube[/ame] Could Pennsylvania be the one?
I will say this, they do keep us laughing... From the article: ... which immediately disqualified all of them, since they all had dual allegiance. LOL
states can't impose eligibility requirements outside the bounds of the US constitution. not even one parent is required to be a citizen, let alone both in order to be eligibile. there is a reason you birthers have lost every single legal challenge to date flanders. Care to take a guess as to why that might be? or will you continue to treat this forum like your own personal blog, and run away every time someone refutes your claims, and engages you in a dabate?
If not Pennsylvania then maybe Indiana? Indiana warns Obama of eligibility 'default' Election commission set to hear complaint Published: 3 hours ago http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/indiana-warns-obama-of-eligibility-default
come on flanders, don't run away........ engage flanders. engage in debate. this isn't your personal blog
I am sure that the state appreciated being warned and also being told what definition the State should be using- in essence being told to regard every contrary decision in the last 3 years. Logic dictates that this will conclude in the same manner as every other Birther challenge- with Birthers losing and declaring that the judge/official/girl scout/nun- whoever- that declared Obama is eligible is a traitor and must be being intimidated or threatened. To the Birthers making money off of this, and their gullible followers, the possibility that everyone else might be right just is a thought that is too terrifying to consider. [/B]