Z's First Court Appearance: He Lied Under Oath

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by SkyStryker, Apr 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL owned
     
  2. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL I'll take wild speculation for 100 Alex. :D :D :D
     
  3. webrockk

    webrockk Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    25,361
    Likes Received:
    9,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Pure opinion to follow ;) :

    What she actually heard *17 year old, bulletproof, never show fear in front the ho's* Trayvon say: "Aw (*)(*)(*)(*) this (*)(*)(*)(*), ima go (*)(*)(*)(*) this mother(*)(*)(*)(*)er up...."

    What she said she heard Trayvon say: "Why you following me?"
     
  4. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What?????? I'm sorry, hazard of editing posts when quoting them is missing relevant info.
     
  5. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please tell me you're joking. Its her boyfriend. You can't be that naive.
     
  6. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ugh I have to face palm again. Look at the (*)(*)(*)(*) timeline. Both Trayvon and Zimmerman were well off the road onto the cut through before Zimmerman said that Trayvon had run.
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And what specific evidence do we now have that they did not have then? Not your guesses, not your conjecture, the specific evidence.
     
  8. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes the and the investigator have none the have provided evidence to contradict Zimmerman's statement.

    And even snarkier the deeper you dig your hole.
    There is NO evidence the investigators have to contradict his statement, YOU declaring otherwise is totally fallacious.

    Yes I know what you are afraid of, that after investing some much in your desire to see Zimmerman go to prison that the evidence is falling against you and that those of us with rational minds who have not gotten so emotional over the entire matter are being shown to be correct in their viewing of the evidence,
     
  9. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No you don't. The only time they exchanged words was after Zimmerman was walking back towards his truck to meet the police coming in and Martin reappeared and confronted him.
     
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The map is wrong. The dot saying where the shooting took place was where Zimmerman was when he was talking to 911 and told them he was heading back towards his truck. The fight ensued at the intersection of the walkways between the buildings.
     
  11. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is what the evidence shows, he had lost sight of Martin and was trying to work out a place to meet up with the police and was heading back towards his truck which was parked, if you use the erroneous map brutha posted, backed where the entrance road curves to the east. As he hit the intersection of the sidewalks, the one running south, Martin reappeared and confronted him. Martin had EVERY chance to just go home sit down on his couch and enjoy his Skittles. Instead he ambushed Zimmerman.
     
  12. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nope that one is not correct either. Zimmerman had walked east to the other street and then turned back west to go to his truck. No one knows which path Martin took but he reappeared at the intersection of the sidewalks when he could have just gone on home.
     
    BroncoBilly and (deleted member) like this.
  13. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And what it clearly shows is Martin with a head start and out of view of Zimmerman could have simply gone home and be alive today.
     
  14. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Martin pulled his hoody up over his head turned and walked towards Zimmerman emulating a thug reaching into his waistband to pull out a gun so yes Zimmerman got a look at the front of his hoody.
     
  15. BroncoBilly

    BroncoBilly Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    29,824
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I have enjoyed reading your responses to these armchair loons that think they have Zimmerman tried and convicted. As the the evidence unfolds, Martin appears to be the aggressor. He (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up big time attacking a guy holding a gun. That sure will never happen again. Conceal carry, a perfect solutions to stupid (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up people, there is nothing like thinning the herd of idiots.
     
  16. JohnnyMo

    JohnnyMo Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    14,715
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Zimmerman never stated that he was heading back to his truck
     
  17. a777pilot

    a777pilot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    He lied?

    Why that (*)(*)(*)(*)ing liar!

    I say we drag in out of hiding and string him up to the nearest tree.

    He deserves to die for being a white-hispanic with a gun.

    Trial? We don't need no stinking trial. He's guilty for just being white and killing the next Nobel Peace Prize winner, Bobo's son.
     
  18. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And you know the otherside is losing and getting desperate when they have to make up and misstate the position of the other side so they can argue that and declare themselves correct.

    Fail
     
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes there is, Zimmerman's, and the investigators have no evidence to contradict it. And the burden of proof is on the prosecution.
     
  20. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its TRIAL.... not trail.

    Why are you going to extremes here?

    Don't you think a black man has the same rights to walk down the street as a white man?

    Under Florida law it can be argued that Zimmerman assaulted Trayvon and put him in fear of his life and safety.. without having touched him..
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes that is what he was discussing with the dispatcher where to meet up with them and it was back towards his truck, the mailboxes were beyond that. The road the police would be driving down was where his truck was parked.
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Under that fallacious interpretation of the law it can be argued Trayvon assaulted Zimmerman first while Zimmerman was watching him from his truck and second when Martin confronted him.
     
  23. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In the first statement put out by SPD it stated that Z claimed after he lost sight of Trayvon he was returning to his truck and was attacked by Trayvon. Made no mention of them exchanging words prior to the physical which is highly suspect since it was not well known at that time that T was on the phone when this all went down.
     
  24. Ronald0

    Ronald0 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    2,079
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just had a look at Z's apology again and this is what he say:

    The apology is obviously for following him and then confronting him or whatever he did. He says:
    "I did not know how old he was. I thought he was a little bit younger than I am"

    This obviously means Z thought T to be older than T actually was when we have evidence from the call to the dispatcher proving that was not the case. Z had guessed T's age correctly. He did know know T was much younger than him and not a little younger.
     
  25. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It isn't a fallacious interpretation because the law says harassment or assault does not require actual physical contact and no you can't reverse the components against T because we know with out a doubt Z was following T. Although, I would not be surprised if Zagendas actually tried to claim it was T who started following Z.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page