Evidence STILL severely lacking for Flight 93 mostly buried claim

Well I asked for proof about the mostly buried claim first, so...

Curious, why haven't you questioned skeptic you-know-who about any of his extraordinary claims? Biased?

 

what makes NO sense, is this continuing BS about whether or not the plane was buried...move on.

 

No, it's called your tactic for not having to post evidence.

Except that the evidence to support this report is: STILL severely lacking!

I'm not doing the legwork to prove your claims. Only a "skeptard" thinks I should or would. lol

I must have missed that being mentioned in that video. What's the timestamp when they mentioned that?

Thanks for proving my point. Btw, if the evidence is overwhelming that 93 crashed, how would a motive for staging change your mind?

Heard it from one of the volunteers at the 93 memorial site, who are trained on the official story, so accuse them of lying.

Try me.

I did, I didn't see you post any links to prove your extraordinary claims.

 

Why is it "BS"? Is it because you know it's you skeptic's Achilles heal? That would make sense why you'd want us truthers to "move on" from it. lol

 

No, because it makes no diference, the plane is gone, the people are still dead...move on to another topic...and I'm not the 'skeptic'....YOU are.

 

Most is a red herring. Just a silly word game you like to play. And you didn't ask me directly.

Back to your statement.

I'm assuming you would not say that if you didn't know it to be true. Do you have any evidence or proof that that's what happened or are you just making it up?

If you are making it up and have no proof, just say so.

 

Do you say this about the other 9/11 conspiracy topics, or just this one? Would be telling.

 

Why?

Um, the OP kinda does to all who decides to participates.

You know my deal. It still stands.

 

http://www.unitedflight93.com/

This is a really great article on the matter. It is sad that some people must make up stories about this situation.

 

considering this topic has been resurrected by you numerous times. no, just this one.

 

Well I wouldn't have to keep resurrecting the topic if you skept... er debunkers would hurry up and debunk the topic. What are you guys waiting for?!!

 

Where did it saying anything about most of the plane being buried?

Yes, the FBI making up the story that most of the plane buried is beyond the pale, isn't it?

 

read the article. It may give you some perspective. Have you seen the site of the crash?

 

I did. Help me out. How does it do anything to debunk the topic of this thread?

Yes. Have you ever seen anything like it? Big wing cutouts. Odd fire damage. Mostly disappeared plane. I haven't.

 

THAT is all addressed IN the article. with pictures.

 

There you go again. Asking questions out of turn.

A red herring is an argument (disprove that most of the plane buried) given in response to another argument, (Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville) which is irrelevant and draws attention away from subject of argument (that Flight 93 did indeed crash in Shanksville.)

There, I answered a question for you.

Now please answer mine.

You said . . .

I'm assuming you would not say that if you didn't know it to be true. Do you have any evidence or proof that that's what happened or are you just making it up?

If you are making it up and have no proof, just say so.

 

Direct sources were posted months ago. The lazy and the cowardly refuse to acknowledge them, or they lie about attempting to contact them.

Instead they obsess over me. STILL.

 

LOL! I love it when the truthtards have to dance a jig to keep from actually answering any questions. Keep it up, Suede. Nobody damages your credibility more than you do.

BTW, I like how you disbelieve everything but what is convenient for you. You'll believe someone who wasn't there (and who probably doesn't even exist except in your imagination) who was supposedly told something, but you won't believe the people who were actually there. CLASSIC!

 

Didn't see anything that talked about most of the plane had buried. Please copy and post here.

 

Why would the FBI lie about most of the plane burying then? That doesn't make logical sense.

My deal still stands.

 

Possibly the most ironic comment in the history of the 9/11 section!

Agreed!

 

Delicious irony, 'truther' hypocrisy.

 

Where did they do that? You have yet to show any report that makes that claim.

 

Possibly the 2nd most ironic comment in the 9/11 section!

Since you've made numerous claims and haven't provided any links I've asked to back them up, I think you should worry about your own credibility!

Btw, you still haven't proved the most of 93 buried claim.

Well he was shown saying it on video, so hard to believe he didn't say it.

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit, er convict in this case.

 

Um, no. I went to the site he linked and read it. I said I didn't see any mention of the plane burying in the article. He said it was on there. I read it again and didn't see it, so I'm just asking him to post the parts that say it just in case I missed it twice, or that he doesn't know what he's talking about. No hypocrisy in that. Surprised you couldn't comprehend that being that you are supposed to be so intelligent.