There is no evidence for the existence or non-existence of God...

Apparently you have no inquiry urge.


Perhaps that giant phallic tank obscures your vision.

 

And this just backs it up. Ignoring baseless claims is not the same as not having an urge to learn. That's an asinine thing to claim. It's baseless.

 

Talk about NOT understanding anything. AND I didn't say "urge to learn" I said urge for inquiry.

My example gave the basis--the SAME (*)(*)(*)(*) everybody looks at evidences all kinds of perspectives. If you "ignore" anything you are presuming a "baseless" premise without inquiry. Keep staring at your gun...

 

So in your mind you have an urge for inquiry if you just accept anything?

That's not an urge for inquiry. That's an urge to not inquire.

 

You are presuming people of faith don't inquire. That's just lame bigotry.

 

Funny how you just presumed a whole bunch of things about what I said to suit your own argument.

 

Your dick is bigger than mine. Go play with yourself. :rolls

 

Good to know that "pink" is a hot element of magic invisibillity.

http://youtu.be/0bjgiN_VowM

 

Which **god** are you talking about?

 

It's not that there is no logical evidence...,....It's that there is none at all.....For either case.....God exists outside of nature, and time, and space, so science can not prove he does not exist......But at the same time, his existence can't be proven either....He exists only on each persons' faith.

 

Just because somethng exists does not prove intelligent design.

 

Absolutely... just because the computer you are using also exists does not mean that the computer came into being by intelligent design. One day a guy was out prospecting and after removing all the sand, he found this strange device with cords attached, so he just started trying different things with it ..... get the picture. It was all the fault of evolution. The minerals in the ground, decided that they wanted to do something different. ... So they did something different.

 

Just because a tree exists does not prove that god made it......Man made things don't count when talking about divine creation......Anyone with half a mind would understand that.

 

Ahh! I get it now. Intelligent design discounts man from being intelligent. Got it.

Just because a tree exists does not disprove the existence of God.

Someone 'with half a mind' would more than likely, be in real sad shape. Have you ever met a person 'with half a mind'? I haven't. How is the mind measured so that one could conclude that a person only had a 'half a mind'?

 

When discussion whether or not god exists and using the fact that the universe exists as proof, manmade things are irrelevant....twist my words all you want,.,.,. you are still wrong. deal with it.

 

Am I also wrong about the 'half a mind'? That is a logical fallacy considering that there is no way to 'measure' the mind.

 

that's why it's called free will.

you are free until the day you die.
then the truth comes out.

the only certainty in this life, one might say, is "birth and death".
no argument there. every single human being agrees on that.
everything else is arguable to us. endlessly.

and at the same time, those two are the only things
that we know nothing about.

where do we come from?
and where will we go?

that's where all dilemmas or personalized agreements are originated.

the limited understanding of man tries to grasp the answers...
when he can't (through logic) he attempts to find ways to explain.
because he wants to be immortal. he doesn't wanna cease to exist.
who would?

while doing that he looks around and tries to reason, rely
on some sort of certitude, or proof maybe.
what is the sense of all of this???

but in fact there is no lab proof for a belief.

his essence is everlasting and it's trapped in a material body.
and that body will be worm food.

why?

you either look at the skies and see a greater intelligence,
a designer or a creator...
or look at the very same thing and say "big bang".

what will happen after we die?
and how did we get here?

those are the questions.
if you sort these out you can live your life accordingly.
in serenity.

one must ponder upon death.
the reason of existence.
read read and read.

because death will come -not necessarily-
when you reach a certain age.

until then seek "the truth".
seek your creator.

it's this one chance you have been given.
this life. you only live once.

you are equipped for these conditions and your purpose here.
don't waste it on hearsay.

don't throw out the one good apple
just because the rest of the basket is rotten.

you can read all the books in the world and still
act basing your beliefs on your comfort zone,
your low desires or your habits.

don't.

humans are not that complicated.
it only gets complicated when you rely on yourself
rather than relying on Allah.

those probably weren't what you wanted to hear.
be well.

 

There is no evidence of the no existence of invisible pink unicorns. But do you believe that they exist? No.

The same with God.

Only you can believe as real in something if you have evidence of its existence. If not that is if it didn't exist.

You can believe, or want to believe in something. But is just that, a belief. You can't assure that is real. Is like believing that the kebab is the best food of the world. That is just an opinion. Not a reality. The same with the belief of God.

 

no one must suggest to end a debate about god related matters.
the claim of god, has to be resolved.

we are now in the advance process of doing so.

polscie

 

so long and yet non-sense.

polscie

 

The word "God" or "God" stands alone and on its own and so therefore
an analogy like this "pink unicorns" is not acceptable.
By making a comparison like this one, only complicates the matter
sorrounding this claim of "God".

"God" is the oldest unseen matter that the primitive was claiming to be.
This pink unicorn is just word/s put together:

a colour pink.
a four legged animal.
a horn.
then walla, you've got a pink unicorn.

if you like you can say:
a shape of square.
a fruit.
a weight of 20 kilos.

then you can produce a:
20 kilogram square apple.

very lame, the analogy of this "God" and pink unicorns.

polscie

 

very good.
we are very elite.
but then the nuclear bomb comes:

did you mean "voilà"?
but i checked anyway to make sure:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=walla

Walla is a word used by retarded Americans who
don't know any foreign languages and barely know
their own. The correct word they are looking for is
"voila", which loosely translates as "here it is", "there
you go", or similar meanings.​

 

Calling someone "retarded" for not spelling a foreign word correctly seems to be an insult. Why some people enjoy insulting others?

Ludwik Kowalski
.

 

Wrong argument. You can't argument in that way that the invisible pink unicorns don't exist. Do you have proofs? No.

God is just an idea. The same like invisible pink unicorns.

 

I'm not talking about "proving God," I'm saying that unexplained phenomena (that does indeed exist) isn't necessarily logical.