Lies and Deciet of the Climate reform movement.

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by lolcatz, Nov 2, 2011.

  1. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    LOL!!!!

    Thats why homeschoolers, and private schoolers, score higher on their SAT's right?
     
  2. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OMG!!!!!

    So, the Climate doom and gloom nuts all have arrived, and have done nothing but call me names, and claim that i am wrong, yet no one has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, that im wrong.

    I live in America, thats how we roll here. Evidence (real), or ****.
     
  3. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And you can't refute the science....
     
  5. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I have refuted it, and you have yet to prove me wrong... Thats a win for me...
     
  6. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BOOM!!!!


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faNYx4q5nQM"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faNYx4q5nQM[/ame]
     
  7. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL!

    So you have refuted every study that has ever confirmed/agreed with ACC? Stop kidding yourself.
     
  8. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BAM!!!

    All 8 parts in one post. Its going in the OP so people can see the truth...
    I dont care what science you believe. All i know, is Climate reform is crony Capitalism...

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7BGZnDkOVQ&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7BGZnDkOVQ&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv7BVMZRc4c&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv7BVMZRc4c&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiBaiw4rAFs&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiBaiw4rAFs&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk-nvwWaXy8&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk-nvwWaXy8&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEVUJ174kLA&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEVUJ174kLA&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U74V5g55YAw&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U74V5g55YAw&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtx7AQSS5A&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtx7AQSS5A&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKOhWL1Vwdc&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKOhWL1Vwdc&feature=related[/ame]
     
  9. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    LOL.

    Nice propaganda film.

    You climate people tend to debunk us "deniers" by calling us names, or making fun of us. Why do you display this typical human defense mechanism?
     
  11. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
  12. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No. In fact, I'm not ok with you posting any film at all. Anyone can make a film, and any idiot can post a link. And so far, that's all you've done: post links to other people's ideas.

    What you have not yet done is demonstrate that you actually understand anything about any link you post. You make no arguments and have no original thoughts. Any argument Lord Monckton makes is right in your mind. If Monckton made a bad argument, you wouldn't even be able to recognize it. By the same token, if Monckton made a good argument, you wouldn't be able to defend it. Because you don't have a clue what he's actually saying, or why he's saying it. The only thing you know is, he's on my side so he must be right.

    You're not thinking. You're letting other people think for you. Which is why you're not worth my time to debate.
     
  13. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You shouldn't put words in peoples mouths. It's not a good look.
     
  14. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Wow, avoiding the real issue. Typical
     
  15. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Errr, my post was in response to your claim that "if I posted a biased film promoting your lie, you would be okay with that?"

    Please try to keep up.

    EDIT: I feel much the same as Poor Debater. He hit the nail on the head with that post.
     
  16. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    But wait, you climate goofs post articles made by "scientists" that are paid to prove what you want to hear. I have posted videos of those same scientists coming out and saying that they cant promote the lies. What am i supposed to do? Am i supposed to make a claim and then not prove it?

    The same goes for you, If your scientists come out and blatantly tell you that they were lying about climate change, you would call them deniers. You are blind. I have proven this. But you climate nuts call me a conspiracy theorist.

    Whatever. I know, that most people dont believe in climate change. A few people like yourself, sill believe with all your heart that we should all be taxed for breathing. But, just know, you are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. BTW, That means you admire the enemy, and start fighting for their cause...
     
  17. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    if the cap fits ....

    especially the tin foil cap .....
     
  19. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    dreaming ...

    the deniers keep making up lies to "prove" theyare correct ... they don't just sit back and watch.

    if they did - we could move forward on this.
     
  20. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    seriously - when doing social research you have to break down the informaton you are looking at.

    using some home schoolers doing well as a typical example may not be accurate.

    you also need to break down the scores.

    how to home schoolers from lower middle class white families in the US compare on science to school attendees from the same group?
     
  21. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ther eis plenty of evidence.

    that you are not aware of that demonstrates your own lack of ability to research, or your personal preference for conspiracies.
     
  22. MannieD

    MannieD New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,127
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Indeed. As do I!
     
  23. Not Amused

    Not Amused New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is because you demand they fund more government ineffectiveness and corrpution. Their / my / response is in self defense.

    AND DO WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU HAVE NO SOLUTIONS!!!!!

    Yes, you will rattle on about all these inefficient, expensive technologies that have gaping holes in them. That also require huge investments in new infastructure to utilize what little energy they produce.

    You have no solution for transportation fuel - air travel doesn't work on batteries.

    You don't even have a solution for installing the technology you do have without the other half of your environmental movement screaming about killing jelly fish fleas, and how that will disrupt the entire ecosystem.
     
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    91,871
    Likes Received:
    73,626
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I would rather spend money investigating BETTER ways of doing things than sit around and moan about how nothing works properly - doe it make any sense at all that our current electricity system have no storage capacity? Most have not been reviewed for at least half a century if not more, we have grids that are one solar CME away from reverting us to stone age and you think this is GOOD?

    As for your right wing "It's all the enviro's fault!!" Have you ever stopped to think that at least half of the "environmental movement" is actually cheap journalism manufacturing dissent?
     
  25. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're supposed to understand your claim and the evidence for it (and against it) enough to support it in your own words, with a summary of the evidence in your own words. A high-school student writing an essay can do that. You should be able to.

    If you think ten thousand scientists from a hundred nations have all been engaged in a grand conspiracy for the last century and more, then yes: you are a conspiracy theorist.

    False. Poll after poll has shown that most people from most nations understand and accept that the world is warming. Now here is an example of where and when to post a link. I've just said your statement is full of crap, and you can disprove that by posting a link to a poll that proves your statement is correct. And if you actually find such a poll (which I doubt you can), then I would counter with half a dozen other polls that show you're wrong.

    The difference is, we would be using links to support an argument we ourselves are making, rather than getting the links do all the work.

    Strawman: I have never said that and do not believe it. Next time, please address the arguments I actually make instead of the arguments you imagine I had made.

    And your evidence for this is what, exactly?
     

Share This Page