Syrian "Rebels" Are Retards, Mentally Defective Deviants

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Mario Milano, Dec 18, 2012.

  1. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where US tax payer dollars end up!

    ___
    December 18, 2012

    40 Syrian "rebels" accidentally blew themselves up in a car bombing gone horribly wrong. It's more than okay to laugh.

    What are these "rebels" rebelling against, exactly? Intelligence?

    LOL @ the fact that the CIA is depending on these half-baked idiots to topple Assad. Good luck.

    Maybe they should pick and train guys who can tie their own shoelaces. Just a suggestion. Drugged out retards do not make the best fighters.

    Then again, the CIA knows exactly what kind of guys it wants to create chaos in Syria: clueless terrorists, not serious and mentally capable fighters.

    An excerpt from the AntiWar.com article, "Report: 40 Rebels Killed in Failed Aleppo Car Bombing":

    Car bombings causing massive casualties are common enough in the ongoing Syrian Civil War. Today’s incident in Aleppo’s Bustan al-Qaser neighborhood, however, is something entirely different.

    That’s because this time, at least according to reports, the unnamed rebel faction rigging the car with explosives accidentally detonated it before it was set up, killing an estimated 40 fighters loyal to the faction.

    Rebels have been claiming major gains in Aleppo in recent days and are predicting they will soon take over the city. They have been predicting imminent victory for months, however.

    http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/syrian-rebels-are-retards-mentally.html
     
  2. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Assad is about to fall, he is alone and weak, get used to it.

    Even the Palestinians left him, Hamas condemmed him, Russia adimitted he is going to fall too, in short find another tree to climb up to.
     
  3. Skeptical Heretic

    Skeptical Heretic New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not like Syria has any allies, everyone in the region hates Syria apart from Iran but it's hard to hate what you have power over in that case. Assad has no allies to help him and he's against people who are set out to get him out of power. I can't see this ending well for him but you never know he could always use those weapons he has but that would end up even worse in the long run.
     
  4. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You people really need to stop listening to POX news, haven;t you worked out that they are full of crap yet...so stop repeating that merda.

    Now the real reason what is behind the Syria violence same as the Libya violence same as Iraq etc...it was all planned in the USA...nothing to do with who hates who! Just Zionazi controlled USA installing Rothschild central banks into those countries and stealing their resources!
    __

    we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.--General Wesley Clarke 2007
     
  5. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and just as General Clark told us what the USA was up to in Syria.....it all comes out what that Zionazi controlled USA is doing around the world
    ___

    Obama’s War on Syria and its Implications

    The Obama administration has already declared war on Syria, even if it isn’t “official” yet. Consider the facts, all of them acts of war: The U.S. now recognizes a group of Syrian exiles to be the official government of Syria; the U.S. is providing direct support for rebels attacking the government; the U.S. has coordinated with NATO to place advanced missile systems — and 400 U.S. troops — on Syria’s border with Turkey; Obama has drawn a “red line” that, if Syria crosses, would result in U.S. direct military intervention. If any other country made similar moves toward the U.S., there would be no question that war had been declared.

    All the strategic steps that led to the Iraq war are being repeated. Obama has assembled a Bush-style international “coalition of the willing” of nations to topple the Syrian government; 130 countries have put their names on paper in support of toppling the Assad government.

    In reality, however, the core of the group is the U.S./Europe NATO alliance and the Gulf monarchies. The rest of the “coalition” are economic and political satellites of these main groups, who would sign onto to any military adventure that the rich nations demanded of them, since otherwise the poorer nations would have their military, financial, or political aid frozen.

    Europe’s increased lust for blood is a relatively new phenomenon; the European divisions that erupted during the Iraq war and then the Libyan invasion seem to have been smoothed over. Now even Germany aims to directly join the war efforts, intending to send missiles and troops to the Turkish border as well.

    But NATO is still a U.S.-dominated military alliance. Any NATO military action is in reality a U.S. led effort, since the European armies are miniscule in comparison, and lack much of the technological sophistication of U.S. weaponry. The advanced Russian missile systems that Syria is equipped with demand a direct U.S. military role to neutralize.

    Like Bush, Obama is using his coalition of the willing to distract from the fact that he is circumventing the UN, and thus bringing the post WWII system of international conflict resolution — already on life support — closer to death.

    Also like Bush, Obama strategically exploited the UN to weaken Syria with sanctions, and when further UN action was not possible — because of the objections of China and Russia —Obama threw aside the UN and opted for NATO, a U.S./European military alliance built specifically as a deterrent to the now-defunct Soviet Union.

    Again like Bush, Obama has crafted a false motive for war. Obama has stolen Bush’s “weapons of mass destruction” but substituted “the use of chemical weapons” as a bogeyman worthy of military intervention. Obama’s bogeyman is as false as Bush’s was. The New York Times reports:

    “…the effect of that statement [that Syria was planning to use chemical weapons] was somewhat undercut when France’s foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, asserted during a news conference that such reports were unconfirmed.”

    This lack of confirmation hasn’t bothered the U.S. media, who remain content repeating as truth any report issued by U.S. intelligence, no matter the past lies that have cost countless deaths in Iraq and elsewhere.

    Rest of the article here:

    http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/obamas-war-on-syria-and-its-implications/
     
  6. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Naturally, why should we pay the banks and let the Syrian get away from it? they need to pay like everyone else, no discounts.

    But the Syrian citizens are still about to hang their dictator soon, either that or if Assad gets his way - Syria will split and have some security to the Alaway's, the Kurds, The Sunni and Shea
     
  7. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If the Syrian citizens wanted him gone Assad would have been gone early last year, the reason why he isn't going anywhere is because the Syrians support him.... How can you not get that? seriously dude stop repeating POX crapiola...the only way ZIONAZI Occupied USA are going to get rid of Assad is if they do an Iraq on him,you know the WMD load of crap which they are already trying...but we will see if Russia will allow that to happen this time!
     
  8. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You need to read a bit about Syria, not from a ZIONIST media ofc, try searching Muslim wiki - something like that, the alternative reality to our existance......

    You'll find Syria is made of several nations and disputed religions, the minority is in power and they never shared the wealth equaliy as dictatorships go, that's why his own "tribe" supports him and will give their lives to his cause because they know they are doomed when he falls, they others dont share that love for him - and they are winning.
     
  9. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are going to take out Somalia? why? you got short of nuclear waste?

    If Assad had no support this war thing will have never lasted more than few weeks, look what happen to the other countries of the area.
     
  10. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But the fact is that the people in Syria support Assad that is why he is still in power...if the Syrians didn't support him he would have been gone already. It is only ZIONAZI OCCUPIED USA that wants him gone....go to the above quote from Gen Wesley Clarke...he told you to your face but you somehow ignore that little fact?
     
  11. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why do you say that?
    Even if they are, are they not fighting for what would be regarded as "the greater good"?
     
  12. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its not possible that some support him and some dont?
     
  13. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only ones that don't support him are the ZIONAZI OCCUPIED USA hence why they are funding the destruction of syria just like Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Sudan...oh wait we were told 5 years ago the ZIONAZI OCCUPIED USA were going to do this:

    "we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” General Wesley Clarke 2007


    Now what part that this was planned years in advance by the ZIONAZI OCCUPIED USA are you not getting?
     
  14. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The part that those who fight him are not Americans and sure A'int Israelis, other than that it all fits........
     
  15. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    \

    And what part of this are you ignoring?

    "we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” General Wesley Clarke 2007
     
  16. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    oh BTW I forgot to add...hahahahahahahahahahaha...That's the best the CIA can come up with?...no wonder they have been getting their asses kicked for nearly two years now!

    40 Syrian "rebels" accidentally blew themselves up in a car bombing gone horribly wrong. It's more than okay to laugh.

    What are these "rebels" rebelling against, exactly? Intelligence?

    LOL @ the fact that the CIA is depending on these half-baked idiots to topple Assad. Good luck.
     
  17. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That doesnt mean anything actually, but even if those words came out of Obama himself of national TV, still, the ppl that fight Assad and win are Syrians, now you can pay me 10 mil $ and Ill never betray my country let alone fight it so how can you explain the Syrian rebals taht actaully managed to defeat Assad very well supplied army?
     
  18. Mario Milano

    Mario Milano New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have got to be kidding...a general comes out and says what they are going to do then they are doing it and you say it doesn't mean anything????seriously mate like get freakin real!

    But on another note it is (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hiliarious that the governemt that the ZIONAZI OCCUPIED USA recognize in Syria...that their military (paid rat bags really) blew themselves up...that's who the ZIO USA recognizes as a legitimate Govt?

    According to the USA, Dumb And Dumberest is the new Syrian Govt but apparently the Syrians want no part of these morons but the USA who are not Syria disagree... YANKEE GO THE HELL HOME!
     
  19. skeptic-f

    skeptic-f New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just about everybody in this thread is talking about the Syrian rebels as if they were some kind of monolithic organization that all thought the same way, had the same objectives and who used the same military tactics. The rebels are nothing of the kind: there are separatist Kurds, moderate Sunnis who want to have more power (traditionally Alawites had the most, followed by Christians and then Shia), extremist Sunnis who are at least Islamist and some are even Islamo-fascists (Al-Qaeda types) and there are even some Western-oriented rebels who actually dream of a more open democracy and civil rights.

    That's not even mentioning the main fighting force, the Free Syrian Army, which is mainly made up of defecting/deserting Syrian army personnel. The various units are operating in different parts of the country and have been experiencing cooperation problems, as several of the regional commanders appear to think they deserve to be the overall commander of the FSA. Their attitude in the aftermath of a successful end to the civil war is also important, as they will control most of the remaining guns (unlike Libya, which is so awash in armaments that it resembles Texas).

    I have been frustrated by the lack of decent information on who the important players are among the rebels, but I have read enough to realize that the aftermath of Assad's ouster could go a number of very different ways.
     
  20. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wesley Clarke is a grandstanding nincompoop... a garden variety conspiracy theorist.
     
  21. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You cant choose who the rebals are, you can support them or not, that's all.

    You think it was the best option for the US to support the Egyptian revolution against their ally Mubarak? they had no choice in the matter its what the Egyptians wanted, same goes to Syria, you cant stop the tide, it will soon be over I expect.
     
  22. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yea, I agree, the US recognized them because it wants one landlord in charge, I think everyone does exept the Syrians that are divided, very intersting to see how it will develope, I think in that scenario fighting wont stop when Assad will hang for some time.
     
  23. Abu Sina

    Abu Sina New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,370
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is true and what I have been saying for more than a year now.

    The UN has now admitted that these 'jihadists' 'foreign fighters' 'armed militias' whatever you want to call them who have flooded in have created a civil war.

    There it's official now!

    What I have been saying over and over again!

    If Assad falls and it looks like the US-Saudi-Israel will stop at nothing to make that happen so they can then move on to Iran next what Syria will become is another Iraq.
    A complete civil war.

    Anyone with any brain at all and knows the region and the players knew what the result would be long ago.


    When Assad said, just like Gaddaffi said, that it was terrorists and paid terrorists they were fighting not ordinary protesters. The rest of the world should have listened.

    They were right.

    The moment you saw the Houla massacre with the beheadings and the beheading executions and the killing of Shia and Christians, you should have known that was the hallmark of the Saudi inspired Wahabi jihadists.
    Instead the West tried to convince the world it was Assad.
    It was not. We know that now.

    Syria is the new Iraq and there will be decades of civil war there now as the three above march on next towards Iran!


    Michael Cherlov
    UN

    "According to Site Intelligence group, Nusra claimed responsibility in one day alone last month for 45 attacks in Damascus, Deraa, Hama and Homs provinces that reportedly killed dozens, including 60 in a single suicide bombing. "In 18 communiqués issued on jihadist forums ... most of which contain pictures of the attacks, the al-Nusra Front claimed ambushes, assassinations, bombings and raids against Syrian security forces and 'shabiha', pro-Bashar al-Assad thugs," Site said."

    "Collectively, the numbers of Syrians on the move dwarf any refugee crisis in recent memory. They are fleeing cities that have become ghettoised, initially through the rampant destruction of regime shelling and lately through an uncompromising two-way fight that is whittling away historical cities and starving their inhabitants ...

    Parts of Aleppo, much of Homs and even sections of Damascus are now in worse shape than even Sarajevo or Grozny ever were. The UN is trying to raise $520m to cater for the needs of the 4 million people, almost a quarter of Syria's total population, who it thinks may need help by next summer."
     
  24. Tyrerik

    Tyrerik New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes the usual propaganda you've repeated endlessly! You appear to have quoted Reuters not UN spokesperson and the Reuters report paints a rather different picture: Al Qaeda grows powerful in Syria as endgame nears

    You've never explained why you make such a fuss about those you call Wahabis when your views and world outlook are so similar. "Virginity testing" and throwing people in jail for expressing themselves when what they have to say differs from your views; all the antisemetic conspiracy theories and anti Westernism is just up their street.
     
  25. Mayerling

    Mayerling Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It is what the MB wanted. The egyptian activists were encouraged from 2005 to work towards overthrowing the Mubarak govt, financed and somewhat encouraged by the dept of governance and democracy in USAID- who sponsored and financed NGO's whose function it was- among others- to teach young egyptians how to use the social media to overthrow their govt. The part that was crucially missing, was teaching/warning these activists that they had better have a political base and a political leader to fill in the vacuum- as if they didn't ( and the didn't) there was such an organization standing by and there was - the Muslim Brotherhood. The question is, were those presidential elections really transparent. Did the MB really win. How many egyptians voted yes for the brotherhood because they were admonished to do so per the mosques, or were told to do so as they were fed or paid?
     

Share This Page