+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: china cracks down on dissent

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waltky View Post
    4 wrote: harken back to my first point. this is why we won't bomb China. because if we did, our economy would crash overnight.

    And they won't bomb us either for the reason...

    ... but they could take us over from the inside economically...

    ... should they threaten to quit buying our debt...

    ... they could use it to influence legislation that is favorable to them.

    This is EXACTLY what I'm trying to explain to dujac but he can't grasp it.

  2. #62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dujac View Post
    china now spends more on domestic security than on its military


    Events in the Middle East are reverberating throughout the world, but no government is as committed to squashing domestic protests as is the leadership in Beijing. The government there has begun a crackdown against liberal voices in China. This seems to be a systematic effort that includes control of communications, beefing up internal security, arrest and prosecution of progressives, and even extralegal mechanisms.


    We say "seems" because the Chinese government claims to have no hand in recent events. China's lack of transparency provides deniability, but there is no mistaking Beijing's concern about stability and maintaining social harmony, no matter what the cost.

    "Social management" has been identified as a top priority at meetings of senior national and provincial leaders. At the recently concluded National People's Congress, the Chinese government unveiled the 12th Five Year Blueprint on Economic and Social Development. This document focuses on public security, in particular containing and reducing the tens of thousands of mass-demonstration incidents that now occur in China each year. The Chinese plan includes measures that range from increasing the number of "volunteers" who will keep an eye out for and respond to unrest to beefing up the budget for public security forces. For the first time, the official budget this year spends more money on public security ($95 billion) than the People's Liberation Army ($92 billion).

    japantimes.co.jp
    I don't buy into any jewish broadcast media propaganda. It is to one sides and someone is tring to manipulate the viewer with bogus BS for the financial gain of the jewish owned media and their loyal corporate base.

  3. Icon17

    Dissent & democracy in Taiwan could be a model for China...

    Repressing dissent kills democracy
    Wed, Jul 31, 2013 - The right to dissent is an important fundamental value that is universally cherished by modern democratic states. In democratic culture and under constitutional rule, the need to respect dissenting views is seen as self-evident. Truly democratic societies do not just tolerate dissent, they encourage it.
    Democratic governments should use institutional means to ensure that dissidents can openly express opinions that differ from the mainstream without fear of reprisal. Authorities should also safeguard the right of dissidents to criticize the government, even provocatively. Taiwan’s Constitution protects dissidents’ freedom of speech for good reason, namely to promote genuine competition in the marketplace of ideas so all kinds of opinions can compete openly. Offered a wide range of information and opinions available, people will then be able to seek out the truth, as well as deepen their knowledge and gain enlightenment from exposure to new ideas.

    Freely competing ideas nurture autonomous citizenship and facilitate individuals’ quest for self-actualization, so when those who support society’s majority opinions are willing to protect so-called “minority” dissidents it provides them with room to grow through the absorption of knowledge and ideas, even if they are only doing so in anticipation of the day when they find themselves in the minority. The reason the Constitution guarantees dissidents’ freedom of expression is to ensure that ordinary people, having entrusted their rulers with the power to govern through regular elections, remain the masters of the nation. Therefore, no matter who is ruling the country at any particular time, constitutions protect people’s right to have and express views that oppose those of their rulers’.

    Constitutions safeguard the public’s right to engage in unfettered criticism of the government, to keep an eye on the government in case it abuses its powers and even encourage the exposure of abuses by whistleblowers who are familiar with the inner workings of government. Only when the right to dissent is guaranteed can citizens genuinely participate in a democracy. This participation is the source of a society’s vitality, serves as a corrective balance for rulers’ biases and is the essential motivating force driving a society to engage in collective reflection and institutional reform. Democracies need to provide multiple channels through which the public can express any dissenting views they have and to supervise the government to ensure that policymaking is legitimate and transparent.

    Governments have a duty to provide concrete, detailed information about their governance and policymaking, engage in genuine dialogue with their citizens and allow themselves to be tested. However, instead of fulfilling these duties, the Taiwanese government paternalistically trumpets the supposed benefits of controversial policies such as the cross-strait service trade agreement, while accusing anyone who disagrees with its opinion of drawing a distorted picture of the policies. If there is no frank, open dialogue between the state and the public, how can anyone judge which side is doing the distorting? If ordinary people have no access to genuine dialogue and no way of supervising the government, it should hardly come as a surprise when guerrilla-like protests pop up everywhere.

    More http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit.../31/2003568560
    So here is my suggestion: Forget bombs -- we should drop Obama administration policy makers on Iraq and Syria. That would ensure the ruin of the Islamic State in no time!

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 4Horsemen View Post

    This is EXACTLY what I'm trying to explain to dujac but he can't grasp it.
    you have no clue what you're talking about

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567

Similar Threads

  1. Dissent and Democratic Reform in China
    By waltky in forum Asia
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: Oct 12 2014, 12:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks