Flight 93 recovered underground?

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Jul 14, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I keep trying to find some evidence that Flight 93 was buried underground and that it was recovered. It is claimed that 93 was recovered 40 plus feet down. We've never been shown any evidence of this. Anyone who has some, please show it to us. If all you can present is a hole, with dime sized dots of grey something, please post that too. I'm trying to figure out how they determined that it was 95% recovered. We should be able to arrive at around 95% or so of the "official" weight of a 747. I'm wondering if that 95% was all dime sized pieces, or if there might be something a bit bigger, or if they just weighed all the little dots and pronounced it 95% complete.
    Thanks.
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1 min clip,

    see the 15sec to the 35 sec mark.

    Explains fully how they found it underground.


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wAnVuWuFQI"]Frontios had the same problem[/ame]


    things were always buried for some reason
     
  3. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Really? Have you been excavating the site?
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    there is a pic of the engine that was found underground in the gubbermint exhibit records. LOL

    I am sure candy can post it for you it.
     
  5. bigcrash

    bigcrash New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where has it been claimed?
     
  7. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I've seen drunks weave less than this. Grab the wheel and straighten that fail-mobile out.
     
  8. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope. At least I haven't seen any evidence that comes close to supporting that.
     
  9. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think RtWngaFraud showed how that engine was planted -- hint: it's right next to the engine. It explains why that's the only piece of debris seen being dug out of the ground even though 80 percent of the 757 was supposedly in the ground!

    He's talking about parts recovered underground. I have a question though, where was this piece found -- like specifically?
     
  10. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010915blackbox0915p3.asp
     
  11. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Parts were found all over the place, and even in the trees. It must have taken those government agents ages to plant all those thousands of parts on the ground, in the ground, in the lake, in the trees...

    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010929somerset0929p3.asp

    It probably took them as long as it did to surreptitiously plant all those explosives in the WTC towers without anyone noticing. Cecil B Demille would be jealous of that cast of thousands.
     
  12. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    In the ground, on the ground, in the trees, in the lake....
     
  14. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Might have."

    And just to let you know what the thread topic is about:

    "Flight 93 recovered underground?"

    not in the trees.
     
  15. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    Followed immediately by: "Some pieces of the aircraft -- most no larger than one square foot -- have already been found because of the bad weather, he said"

    You dulled your fillet knife long ago.
     
  16. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This thread is just concerned about the alleged LARGE amounts of debris in the ground and FYI, one engine and two black boxes don't come close to proving 80 percent of the 757 was in the ground.
     
  17. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    To your edit: In the ground, on the ground, in the trees, in the lake....

    This thread was a failure from it's opening post. Go read it.
     
  18. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why wouldn't they find debris that was planted?
     
  19. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    This thread is purely concerned about cherry picking and parsing to support disingenuous Truther arguments. As was your thread. Suede meet 'Fraud, chicken meet egg.
     
  20. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What disingenuous Truther arguments?
     
  21. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RtWngaFraud,

    Doesn't NAB's response to this thread indicate that the skeptics are terrified of this subject?!

     
  22. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Time to step out of the way once the fluffing starts. :lol:
     
  23. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bump for NAB
     
  24. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
  25. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page