Palestinian Statehood ( Part 3 )

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by moon, Sep 27, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    This thread is the invited continuation of the previous two, both of which exceeded the forum page limit.


    The neoZionist response, so far, has been to announce further illegal squat construction. That's apart from the Palestinians they've killed and the olive groves they've uprooted since the Statehood bid was accepted.


    Full details of this week's neoZionist terrorism are available here;
    http://tinyurl.com/5rkt9qj
     
  2. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Palestine can only be established by war. However, such a war would be so ferocious that the land and people would be destroyed. Palestine and Israel are locked in a dance of death in which both peoples will be destroyed.
     
  3. Oddquine

    Oddquine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Much like Israel, both the invented Biblical version, and the modern one, were established by war, then.

    Better both were destroyed imo, than Israel be left to control the USA and rule the world through AIPAC....because the more I study Zionism, the more it scares the crap out of me.

    I'd have hated to live in Nazi Germany, but, and I don't bloody care who I offend, living in Zionist controlled Israel is only different in degree to Nazi-ism....not in basic ideology and I'd have hated that as well.

    Would any of you who are so irrationally pro-Israel/Zionism and so quick to shout anti-semitism at those of us who compare Nazi ideology with the Zionism as practised in Israel from Mandate days care to explain to me/us the differences in nuance between Hitlers "Master Race" and the Zionist version (note, not the whole world Jewish community version) of "the Chosen People?
     
  4. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    A good read;

     
  5. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    OK , so the US of AIPAC didn't try to block the review. That's possibly a response to the neoZionists' announcement of more land theft in Jerusalem. Uncle was not impressed.
     
  6. The Judge

    The Judge New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,345
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Uncle Sam needs a new foreign policy. It's quite silly to reject the nation of Palestine while allowing Israeli illegal settlement expansions to continue. Obama should campaign to become the next president of Israel:

    ‘Post’ poll finds surge in Obama popularity in Israel
    http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=239816
     
  7. creation

    creation New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,999
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Uncle Sam doesnt give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about Palestinians or anyone else unless they provide them with either money, votes or kill them in large numbers.

    This is why their position as leader of the free world based on their number of battlegroups is untenable and soon to end as they collapse under the weight of their own hypocrisy.
     
  8. Oddquine

    Oddquine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    A consequence to be hoped for and celebrated by all those who are completely hacked off at the actions and influence of the US of Paranoia and Warmongering on the world.

    Israel is the USA lite..and between the two, they undoubtedly will trigger WWIII and the end of life as we know it..because nobody is trying to stop them.

    And you know something, even if I have been vapourised and am not alive to see it, what rises in the world from the ashes of USA and Israeli arrogance may not be any better, but sure as Hades it cannot possibly be any worse.
     
  9. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you guys familiar with the Myth of Sisyphus? :)
     
  10. Allegiance

    Allegiance Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    How far will you take this issue ?
    I have seen many posts over this ongoing controversy.Seemingly,it is very easy to resolve the dissent points between israel and palestine.But by investigating profoundly into the issue (something most of us have not done yet),it is pretty simple to figure out how complicated this issue is.There is a lot of people who think there is just one side that needs mellow and compassion,it is obviously wrong.
    Israel also desires calmness and advancements.
    As an israeli,I do not favour any side of the controversy because it is truly unfair.
     
  11. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Israeli concept of a Jewish state is irreconcilable with the Palestinian concept of the right of return. One side will win and the other side will disappear into the mists of time.
     
  12. Oddquine

    Oddquine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Or alternatively, they will have negotiations and come up with a compromise with which both sides can live.
     
  13. creation

    creation New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,999
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0

    This is the nightmare scenario, for people such as Albert Borat HBendor etc etc here.
     
  14. axialturban

    axialturban Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They've got assurances of 8 votes of the required 9, though of course the USA is expected to (rightly) veto.
     
  15. skeptic-f

    skeptic-f New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I actually am in favor of giving the Palestinians statehood, but they are missing several important elements usually used in international law.

    1 . They have no contiguous boundaries or defined boundaries. If you use the pre Six Days War boundaries, Gaza is still separate from the West Bank. This is due to the events from 1947 on, but it is a real legal impediment.

    2. They have no unified governing body. The Palestinian Authority is in charge of the Palestinian areas of the West Bank and it is controlled by Fatah. The Gaza strip is controlled by Hamas, which has created an extra-legal authority using its original elections to the Palestinian Authority while generally refusing to submit to any outside control.

    3. They are overdue for elections, so if they are a state they are apparently a non-democratic state. Approving dictatorships is not normally a popular United Nations activity (at least not without greasing some palms.
     
  16. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    If Palestine has no borders then neither does Israel.
    Palestine is only two separate enclaves because the Zionists have forcibly- and of course illegally- separated them.


    There is a world of difference between your slanted ' submission to control ' and bi-partisan agreement. All democracies have opposition parties. In addition, Palestine is Occupied Territory. You've got a nerve suggesting that the rules of free democracy should apply.

    ' Dictatorship ' now, is it ? :mrgreen: Again, Palestine is occupied- a fact that clearly requires repeated reinforcement for you- but even so has demonstrated sufficient dignity to garner the support of well over two thirds of the world's States at the United Nations- without spending one US of AIPAC dollar on bribes.
     
  17. axialturban

    axialturban Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    LOL, I hear that argument sometimes... except Israel's borders do exist, they are with Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.

    Jordan invaded the West Bank despite an agreement not to during the 67 war, once all those Arab nations made it clear of their intentions it came down to a war and when war's end the borders are set. Stop trying to take advantage of the Israeli compassion in letting the Palestinians try to create their own existance despite them not choosing to accept the outcome of the war and instead spending decades conducting a continuation of the war as a terrorist campaign.
     
  18. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Not according to international law- and that's what counts, old chap. Otherwise the Palestinians could unilaterally declare their State to be the whole of Palestine and we could all start accepting neoZionist refugees tomorrow. Want some ?
     
  19. Abu Sina

    Abu Sina New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,370
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yes

    Arabs time and patience is running out for a two state solution

    soon the Arabs will have no choice but to go for one state so the USA should keep that in mind
     
  20. The Judge

    The Judge New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,345
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Would it be fair for Palestine to include all of the West Bank, Gaza and all of Israel south of the most northern part of Gaza in exchange that Israel gets W. Jerusalem? This way, both nations would be connected.
     
  21. axialturban

    axialturban Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What matters is who owns it, not who recognizes it.
     
  22. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Moon, Zionist are not, by definition, interested in any agreement, least of all one which would see them return stolen land back to the Palestinian people.

    To expect them to do that, would be akin to the Nazi's agreeing that their ideas on racial purity were a pseudo science - it would not fit with their own aims.

    Zionism is expansionism. Zionism is expansionism through theft and violation of international law. Zionism is anti law. Zionism has the same twisted racial purity element that was mentioned in Hitler's ideas. Only for the 'Chosen'.

    What Israel are 'good' at is pretending the the US media that they are the VICTIMS, they are good at making out like they are civilised and cultured, when by their actions, they are anything but.

    It is smoke and mirrors from them.

    They have no intention of doing what I mentioned before, because Zionism relies on the expansion into that region. So that more of their 'Chosen' can go live there, at the expense, of course, of more land, stolen land, and more laws being broken. Zionism is a hateful and wicked idealogy, who would ideally wish to steal all the land, and more, of the Palestinans, even if it meant the literal eradication of them. Like I said - wicked and hateful.

    There is some cookie quasi religous elements to this, as well, for example, all Jews are to be assembled in this modern Israel. Think about that. There are six million in Israel. Around six million in America. And another six million or so, in Europe. So, in order for this mad part to be honoured, those other 12 million that I mentioned, they would have to be relocated to this Israel.

    We already see some evidence of this, it is not a conspiracy theory, not when Israel offer land and bribes to Jews from elsewhere, who go live there.

    So, this extra 12 million are going to be accomodated where, do you think?

    Doesn't take a genius to figure it out...
     
  23. moon

    moon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    33,819
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yes, but they don't want to go. :mrgreen: Many non-Israeli jews have no interest in ' Zion ' as a physical entity and they are very happy to remain within the societies into which they are already inseparably integrated. Others, malcontents , propaganda victims etc., are discouraged from joining the Great Land Theft by the thought of getting a rockette up their arse. :mrgreen: In that respect the resistance is very successful.
     
  24. axialturban

    axialturban Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    ^^ moon endorsing terrorism. Just face it when Jordan decided to join in and attack Israel in 67, Israel took that as a sign that they needed to assert occupation as a measure of security. Thats what happens in wars. The only problem has been those non-Jewish locals who decided to reject the offer of Israeli citizenship and instead continue the fight ad infinitum whilst preaching oppression.... knowing if they keep it up long enough someone will listen for some reason, and so now here we are half a century of wasted blood later and overpopulation is the 'proof' of Israeli expansionism they were looking for. the only reason the UN recognizes anything other then the West Bank being in Israel is because Israel was compassionate enough to let the locals stay a refugees in their own homes. See above bold, they did not have to, they could have round up anyone not accepting a passport and sent them elsewhere as the squatters they are.
     
  25. creation

    creation New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,999
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Theyre not squatters, theyve been there longer than anyone. They buuilt the place and all the historical industries in it.

    Moreover theres no reason for occupied people to accept their annexation by accepting citizenship. Thats patently an immoral act and you know it.

    But please, do not trouble us further. Your not interested in serious discussion with us and youre not really ready to bring it to us.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page