To All Ron Paul supporters - I am abandoning his support, here's why:

If you have any doubts that I was a very strong Ron Paul supporter for at least since 2007 as I remember, all you have to do is read my web site.

I am abandoning him, and here is the reason: the media destroyed him in 2008 when he was clearly more popular then McCain[/url], Yet he is participating in that circus now. this gives these scumbags legitimacy to destroy him again, as they will. and then it will be a fair loss. if Ron Paul wants my money, and my support, he has to come on stage in the next GOP debate and instead of sounding like his usual chicken (*)(*)(*)(*) among these hypocrites announce something like this:

"Special interests controls this media, this is a special interest circus, and I resign from this circus. people who got America 16 trillion in debt were selected by this circus, they unfairly destroyed my campaign when I was the most popular candidate in 2008, they inserted boos into my speeches when crowds cheered, they showed Iranian anti American demonstrators presented as crowds of my supporters. American people who love their country will not be voting for the scumbags presented on this media, and I am leaving the special interest scumbag race. please visit online for how we can still save American from special interests which control the media..."

Then I will donate to Ron Paul the next day, because I would know he means business, and not resign like last time in 2008.


http://www.youtube.com/user/rytis2010?feature=mhsn

 

Please, Ron Paul is not suffering from some conspiracy of the Press to decide who our politicians are.

Like most Americans I have read much of his writing and while I see glimmers of agreement. The man represents the White Flag of American Decline.

No thanks.

 

I can't take Ron Paul serious as long as he has an (R) next to his name especially after the past decade or so.

 

I can't support him because he doesn't want to bomb more Muslims or continue the War on Drugs.

 

Anybody with two first names will make a GREAT PRESIDENT !


The only way he can possibly lose is if somebody called George Abe runs against him.

 

The 4 year strong supporter.......

Ultimatums are for Tyrants.........

The media attempts to destroy every Republican campaign......or any Non-Democrat Socialist campaign for the matter.......Ron Paul isnt exclusive in this regard.
.
.
.

 

Well even if you did take him seriously you wouldnt like him because his positions are the antithesis of yours.

 

Paul Ryan .

 

Ron Paul is a total whackjob.

His Foreign Policy results in effectively appeasing our enemies.

Ron Paul's condemnation of the execution of a Documented Super Terrorist Awlaki who motivates terrorism against us in many instances is nothing short of idiotic !!!

According to the Constitution one does not need "due process" to execute an established traitor and terrorist even if the whackjob is an American citizen. You can check out the law on this. i am not going to do your homework for you.

How Ron Paul can be considered as a nominee by anyone in their right mind is a source of bewilderment to me ...... unless they are just as whacked out as he is. Or, are the enemies of America.

 

I wouldn't call them "enemies of America". But they are fundamentalists. Secular Constitutional Fundamentalists of a sort this nation hasn't really accepted as mainstream in almost a century. Ron Paul represents the true ideological dinosaurs of America. The pre-World War II, Isolationist Republican Conservative type that still hold grudges from the Civil War and believe in a fundamentalist interpretation of the Constitution.

Secularist ideas are not refuge from devotion and fundamentalism typically associated with the religious.

 

Ron Paul appeals to the young, idealistic and naive amongst us but not to older people like me who realize that the United States has to survive in a brutal, unforgiving world.

 

There is no documentation that Awlaki was a terrorist. You are deluded.

You should try doing your own homework sometime before you spout off about what the US Constitution says...

What was that you were saying about due process?

 

I keep telling my kids 48 is not old... thanks for the confirmation.

Yes the world is brutal and unforgiving, and the US government has contributed much to making it that way and is bent on keeping it that way. But you're old and wise so I'm just telling you something you already know, eh?

 

The fact that Awlaki is not acknowledged by you as a documented terrorist based on the various incidences reported as headlines in the National media makes you suspect of not being connected to a reality that exists on this issue. So I would not toss out the accusation that I am delusional on this issue because that would probably mean that 90% of the Nation (except the predictable 10-15% loonies) are delusional.

And, for whatever security reasons that are probably not divulged, Obama's execution of acknowledged terrorists by the Obama Adm speaks volumes as to the necessary facts supporting the contention tha Awlaki is, indeed, an Islamofascist terrorist swine. The glarting reason being that the Obama Adm is leery of calling even the realistic expression "War on Terror" as some sort of a euphemism, such as a "contingency overseas act". And, the prohibition of the use of the word "terrorism" by labeling it, with another some sort of euphemism, like "man caused disasters" .......all this leads one to think that Obama has more than an abundance of data supporting the notion that Awlaki is a Terrorist Swine. which you as an apologist for islamoFascism's Terrorist Swine deny. I wonder why ? Are you yourself an IslamoFascist Swine ?

As far as the law on this matter is concerned, admittedly, I am not a lawyer. But, anyone who is an acknowledged leader of the Al Queda, which Awlaki certainly is. And, Al Queda being righteously identified of being an enemy of America, which it is. Renders the definition of Awlaki as a traitor as obvious as 2+3 =5.

Thus, even though I cannot give you the Chapter and verse in our Constitution on this issue. Or, the specific law governing this issue, I am sure the established pro Islam appeasing Obama carefully considered his choices. And, Obama's stooge Eric holder, noted for his defense of wierdos, would certainly have not permitted the execution of this IslamoFascist Terrorist Swine by advising his master, the Monumental Fraud & Black Racist Obama from perpetrating this righteous execution of Awlaki, an indisputable IslamoFascist Terrorist Swine.

 

O rlly?

You'd be very surprised.

Dig around on Youtube. There are lots of instances of the media ignoring him despite his success at the polls and dedicated following. They ignored his rallies, they skewed his poll numbers, polls he wins are taken down with no explanation, they flat-our pretend he doesn't exist, and on and on.

I am not a conspiracy-theorist, but this is about as close to a conspiracy that I've witnessed. I'm not sure what else to call it.

 

I am an old man. I agree with the OP, I would like to see Paul come out more aggressively. But I will still support, campaign for, contrubute to, and vote for him. I am not one of the 90% sane americans that believe that printing counterfiet money and killing people because the always-to-be-trusted CIA call him an enemy combatant are sane things to do. If the status quo in this country is sane, then I will proudly confirm my insanity because this status quo is akin to Nero fiddling while Rome burns. America is burning.

 

He's the only one who wants to preserve American Soveriegnty. The rest are pushing us towards world government

 

Why not hold out until the end? You can always cast your vote for someone else, or not vote at all.

 

No they are not. a world government would be GOOD for the people. the rest are pushing for more wars which they perfectly know will not unite but divide the world. the one world order theory is garbage to make them look like they seek unity, they dont, their goal is to divide and conquer: divide middle east, divide USSR, divide us left right black white, etc. etc. etc. drop your theory of one world order.

 

I don't plan to vote for anyone else. I just know he will not be on a ballot, and even if I would get a chance to vote for him, there is nothing he could do alone. what I explain in my web site is an absolute solution. Ron Paul supporters should all jump onto my movement, because it is without a doubt the only solution for America which will revive the economy within a few months.

 

Their goal is to control all the wealth and power the world has to offer. Thus "New World Order". They don't care whether we unite or divide, as long as we remain sheep to their bidding. So be sure to keep supporting their CFR approved candidates.

 

No offense to yourself, or the content of your website, but it sounds a bit ambitious to say the least. I think the odds of RP becoming president in 2012, or a protege of his later on, is more likely than what you propose.

Ron Paul has huge support, his ideas have huge support. If nothing else, RP has laid the groundwork for serious change in the future.

 

What the (*)(*)(*)(*) makes you think I support anything from them? the phrase "one world order" is way too nice to describe what they are doing:

one world - unity, good thing
order - good thing.

Sorry dude, but to me a more accurate description would be divided world disorder, but because the BS is spread with an intent to further and not destroy their cause, it is known as "one world order"

 

I see. You are approaching the term from the standpoint of the people. I understand "New World Order" as a term coined by the powers that be to describe an economy that they could easily control and dominate.

 

ok...........................