s Iran VS PM of Turkey for NATOs Missile Shield?

alan131210 · Oct 10, 2011

October 10, 2011

“A key aide to Iran's supreme leader said on Saturday Turkey must radically rethink its policies on Syria, the NATO missile shield and promoting Muslim secularism in the Arab world - or face trouble from its own people and neighbors’ ”.

Timing is not very good for the PM of Turkey. It is not enough time to use Iran against PKK. PM of Turkey is running out of time to fool Iran. The breakdown of trust between Iran and PM of Turkey just started.

PM of Turkey was trying to use Iran against PKK while Turkey is busy to use the US, EU and Israel for his own personal interest.
Hamma Mirwaisi, representative of the Kurdistan National Congress (KNK) in America
He needs the US, EU and Israel support to eliminate Turkey’s military threat against his Islamic Governments.

PM of Turkey played Western power and Iran against one another for last few years. It is critical time now. Turkey joined the US, EU and Israel when they accepted NATO’s missile shield on Turkish controlled territories. PM verbally was attacking Israel but in reality he is protecting Israel in the NATO’s missile shield.

PM of Turkey is siding with the US, EU and Israel to overthrow the Syrian Government’s of Assad while Iran is trying to help Syrian Governments survival.

Syrian Governments are the only ally of Iran in the Arab world. Turkey’s PM games are over. Iran is not buying Turkey’s explanations anymore. They are aware that PM of Turkey double crossed them.

President Bush said "You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror”. Iran is informing PM of Turkey, your game is over. You are either with us Islamic Extremist to fight the US, EU and Israel or against us. PM of Turkey is already choice the US, EU and Israel as ally instead of Iran and Syria.

PKK is valuable for both sides in the upcoming wars in the Middle East. PKK supports are making the difference in the war. The war is not controlled by Iran or Turkey. It is controlled by the US and NATO allies.

The war against Syria can ignite, the expected larger war of Middle East sooner than later.
PM of Turkey is without farther option. He is under pressure by the US and Iran to choice side. Iran is already knows that PM of Turkey took the US side. What is Iran is going to do now?

Reference
Iran tells Turkey to change tack or face trouble
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=iran-tells-turkey-change-tack-or-face-trouble-2011-10-09

Breath · Oct 11, 2011

Well, this Turkish NATO shield is a defensive shield. If Iran sees it as a threat to itself this clearly means they want to attack Israel soon or intervene to a regional country which means Iran is the aggressor here.

Midnight Express · Oct 13, 2011

We are a NATO member and we dont need to ask Iran's permission for our military decisions.

waltky · May 12, 2012

Uncle Ferd says we gonna go ahead with it whether dey like it or not...

US pledges to go ahead with missile shield plan in Europe
Saturday 12th May, 2012 WASHINGTON - Objections from Russia notwithstanding, the US has said that it along with NATO would go ahead with a European missile defence programme.

"While we strive for cooperation (from Russia), we have also been frank in our discussions with Russia that we will continue to develop and deploy our missile defenses, irrespective of the status of missile defense cooperation with Russia," US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip Gordon said. According to RIA Novosti, Gordon was addressing members of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Thursday evening. He told the committee that NATO was seeking cooperation with Russia on missile defense in order to "enhance our individual capabilities".

The United States and NATO have been wanting to launch a missile shield in Europe by 2020 to counter threats from "rogue" states like Iran. But Russia has been objecting on the grounds that it poses threat to its national security. Moscow wants a written guarantees from NATO that it will not be used against Russia's strategic nuclear deterrent. The US and Russia have been in talks with each other over the issue with Russian military and political leadership repeatedly warning western partners that if talks fail, Moscow may take a series of measures including deployment of Iskander short-range nuclear-capable ballistic missiles in Kaliningrad, a Russian governed seaport exclave between Poland and Lithuania on the Baltic Sea.

The territory, the northern part of the former east Prussia, borders on NATO and EU members Poland and Lithuania, and is geographically separated from the rest of Russia. Russia's Chief of the General Staff Nikolai Makarov has earlier not ruled out delivering preemptive strikes against NATO missile defense systems in Europe if current deployment plans go ahead. Gordon reiterated that the missile shield would not pose any threat to Russia."Let me be clear: NATO is not a threat to Russia nor is Russia a threat to NATO." "It's no secret that there are issues on which the allies and Russia differ. Russia has been critical of NATO's operation in Libya; we also disagree fundamentally over the situation in Georgia."

Source
Click to expand...

See also:

Navy scores a hit in missile defense test
May 10th, 2012 - The Pentagon has made the Aegis ballistic interceptors a cornerstone of its missile defense system, and this week it successfully tested the second generation of the launchers.

A target was launched Wednesday from a ground facility in Hawaii, aimed northwest into a broad expanse of the Pacific Ocean. The guided missile cruiser USS Lake Erie began tracking the target missile and quickly launched a new interceptor missile, the Standard Missile-3 Block 1B. The SM-3 tracked the target missile, adjusted its flight path and, at the right time, fired a warhead at the target, destroying it.

A test of the same missile last September had failed. The Block 1B SM-3 has better tracking sensors and more control systems than its predecessor. The test proved that this new version of the SM-3 could track and destroy longer-range ballistic missiles than the earlier Block 1A version.

The United States has 23 Aegis-equipped warships deployed around the globe that would be capable of firing this new missile once the test phase is complete, which is expect by 2015. The fiscal year 2013 budget request before Congress includes a small increase in spending on Aegis missile defense programs over the current budget.

Source
Click to expand...

DrDjjl · May 13, 2012

PHP:

= [youtube]8caPZxUCKr8[/youtube]

frozy · May 13, 2012

PM verbally was attacking Israel but in reality he is protecting Israel in the NATOs missile shield.- the emotional blackmail which targets the population around a Globe against Israel i.e those who have been drastically hit by Israel- in other words they're grouping allies, after all Iran wants to take a lead in the region and Turkey as a country binding Europe and Asia is a threat since it has to defend it's Euroasian interests and the 'Euro part' is simply the pain in the ass for Iran.

litwin · May 14, 2012

alan131210 said: ↑

October 10, 2011

A key aide to Iran's supreme leader said on Saturday Turkey must radically rethink its policies on Syria, the NATO missile shield and promoting Muslim secularism in the Arab world - or face trouble from its own people and neighbors .
..............

Reference
Iran tells Turkey to change tack or face trouble
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=iran-tells-turkey-change-tack-or-face-trouble-2011-10-09
Click to expand...

meanwhile http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...-have-nukes-give-yours-up.html#post1061204650

Turkey PM: If you don't want Iran to have nukes, give yours up.
Click to expand...

Ömer Hakan Yaran · May 30, 2012

Iran needs us they can't do any think.

waltky · Aug 21, 2016

US close to laser missile defense...

Pentagon: Were Closer Than Ever to Lasers That Can Stop Iranian, North Korean Missiles
August 17, 2016 The Pentagon is looking to lasers as a cheaper, more effective way to shoot down long-range missiles fired at the United States by North Korea and Iran.

After experimenting with the technology for more than a decade, U.S. military officials said directed energy is near the point where they could use it on the battlefield. Its not a hope. This is what were doing, Vice Adm. James Syring, director of the Missile Defense Agency, said Wednesday. I view this [as] highly important for the future. Syring and other military officials struck a common theme at this weeks annual Space and Missile Defense Symposium, arguing that lasers could ultimately augment existing missile interceptors. They want lasers for two main reasons: they could shoot down missiles earlier than todays interceptors and theyre much cheaper to fire. We have to deal with the fact that our interceptors are more costly, said Katrina McFarland, the Armys acting acquisition executive. The cost dimension of warfare must be switched from our side to the adversary side.

Army leaders are concerned that they might have to fire expensive interceptors against far cheaper rockets or small drones packed with explosives. The problem we have now is the worldwide demand for missile defense is greater than the capacity, James Johnson, director of the Future Warfare Center of the Army Space and Missile Defense Command, said Monday at a Defense One Cocktails and Conversation in Huntsville. Congress has appropriated $119 billion for U.S. missile defense projects, including ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California, deployable THAAD interceptors, and radars, according to the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. The Pentagon has asked Congress for $34.87 billion for these projects between fiscal 2017 and 2021. Spending will likely continue at roughly the current rate for the foreseeable future, the think tank said in a recent report.

Close up of the Lockheed Martin Airborne Laser turret in a clean room.

The Navy recently deployed a prototype 30-kilowatt laser on the USS Ponce. The laser, it says, can shoot down small drones and disable speedboats. And it only costs less than $1 to fire compared to missiles, which usually cost millions of dollars a piece. But shooting down a missile would take far more power and hundreds of kilowatts. The technology has to shrink before a fighter jet or drone could carry a laser powerful enough to shoot down a missile. Thats why were pursuing the technology in terms of trying to mature, not just the technology, but drive the size and weight down and we can start to think operationally about what that means, Syring said. The goal is to reduce the size and weight of existing lasers, something the Pentagon has been trying to do for the past decade.

Unlike existing missile interceptors, which collide with enemy rockets in the middle or latter phases of a launch, an anti-ballistic missile laser would attempt to shoot down missiles as they are being boosted toward outer space. The Pentagon tried to do this with the Airborne Laser project last decade, an expensive project in which a laser on an aircraft ultimately shot down a missile in the boost phase during a test. A major issue with the test was that the plane carrying the laser, a Boeing 747, had to get close to the site where missile launched. The massive plane had to carry chemicals needed to power the laser. The aircrafts size made it a sitting duck to enemy aircraft and missile systems. The Missile Defense Agency plans to conduct a lot of testing with lasers mounted on Reaper drones over the next few years culminating with a low-power laser demonstrator project in 2021, Syring said. Pentagon officials hope to decide what that demonstrator might look like in a few years. The goal of that project is to fly a powerful laser at a high altitude that can track possibly kill a missile soon after it is launched, during its boost phase.

MORE
Click to expand...

Log in or Sign up

s Iran VS PM of Turkey for NATOs Missile Shield?

alan131210 New Member

Breath Active Member

Midnight Express New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

DrDjjl Newly Registered

frozy New Member

litwin Well-Known Member

Ömer Hakan Yaran New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

s Iran VS PM of Turkey for NATOs Missile Shield?

alan131210 New Member

Breath Active Member

Midnight Express New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

DrDjjl Newly Registered

frozy New Member

litwin Well-Known Member

Ömer Hakan Yaran New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches

s Iran VS PM of Turkey for NATOs Missile Shield?