Obama regulations costs 200 more people jobs

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Consmike, Oct 14, 2011.

  1. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://communitypress.cincinnati.co...Z01/310130123/Hamilton-s-Smart-Papers-closing

    More regulations, more jobs gone, moved overseas never to return. Great job! let keep destroying American manufacturing and the American life.

    Obama wants this country destroyed.
     
  2. Landru Guide Us

    Landru Guide Us Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you're saying that the release of hazardous chemicals into the air doesn't have a cost? Is that your logic.

    Psssst: count the burdens and the benefits of regulation and maybe, maybe, somebody will take you seriously.
     
  3. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    They could simply comply with the required rules.
     
  4. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    200 people lost their jobs because of Obama's regulations.

    show me the proof abotu these furnaces. seriously, its all crap.
     
  5. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    they can't afford it, hence why people are being let go and the company being sold, if they can and the manufacturing being moved overseas by their competitors.
     
  6. Landru Guide Us

    Landru Guide Us Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Find the proof yourself, if you're so interested. Thanks for admitting you haven't even bother to look before rendering an opinion.

    So if it is true and the regulations prevent a clear harm, would you support them? Of course not. You're totally disingenuous, like a Baggers.
     
  7. Landru Guide Us

    Landru Guide Us Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So if a company can't afford to stop dumping lead in your drinking water, we should let them right?

    Oh, I get it, you want somebody else to bear the burden of deregulation, not you.

    **********y in action.
     
  8. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, if you make a claim then back it the (*)(*)(*)(*) up.
     
  9. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is no lead being dumped into water in this case. stop with your cry baby bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

    So what do you feel about Obama costing 200 people jobs? because some envior freaks cry to him like little (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) babies that leftist liberals are?
     
  10. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Only idiots think/believe we do not have to make a serious effort to keep the environment clean.
     
  11. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The OP's title doesn't gel with the article. Another right-wing bold faced lie.

    "Those new rules, Needham suggested, could make a sale more difficult."

    States the article even though earlier, this was stated:

    Smart Paper filed for bankruptcy in 2006. The Bush Recession was the death knell and it apparently hasn't recovered from the blow.

    The EPA regs have nothing to do with the company selling off its assets.

    From another article dated in January:


    So the real question is why would the OP make such an obvious lie?
     
  12. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0

    and here we have another Todd Failure.
     
  13. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So we can all assume your statement is false. Thanks for clearing that up for us.
     

Share This Page